WHO counts on the support of over 800 collaborating centres to do its mandated work and implement its programmes. To find out what these WHO collaborating centres are and their area of work with WHO please visit the database. You can also learn more about the WHO collaborating centres here.
Neighbouring Countries
04 - 05 November 2024
04 - 05 December 2019
28 - 28 October 2019
Ground Crossing
Port
Airport
No Data!
N/A
2023
AMR Self Assessment
No Data!
MPC
Multisectoral Preparedness Coordination
No Data!
Joint Risk Assessment (JRA)
Universal Health Coverage
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG Target 3.b
SDG Target 3.c
SDG Target 6.2
Others
No Data!
NAPHS
Published Plans in or before 2009
Influenza Plan
N/A
AMR PLAN
-
Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) -
Santé publique France -
Japan, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) -
Thailand, Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) -
European Union -
U.N. Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO) -
Global Affairs Canada (GAC) -
China -
Republic of Korea -
Australia -
Japan -
Fleming Fund -
Japan International Cooperation System (JICS)
-
To address the challenges in Risk Communication identified during the COVID-19 pandemic;
To develop recommendations from the best Risk Communication practices and lessons learnt; and
To identify the areas of inter-national/inter-sectoral collaboration to improve Risk Communication for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as well as other EIDs in the future -
To identify difficulties to inform diverse population about PHE To discuss possible solutions to include migrants and ethnic minorities in ERC To develop recommendations on actions needed to inform migrants and ethnic minorities about PHE
-
To identify difficulties to inform diverse population about PHE To discuss possible solutions to include migrants and ethnic minorities in ERC To develop recommendations on actions needed to inform migrants and ethnic minorities about PHE
-
To identify the challenges for national authorities in informing diverse audiences beyond their country’s borders during PHEs; To develop recommendations on good practice in communicating to global audiences during PHEs; and To build an “economic case”, which can be used to convince other sectors such as Ministries of Finance regarding the importance of investing in PHE preparedness and response capacities, including risk communication
-
To identify the challenges for national authorities in informing diverse audiences beyond their country’s borders during PHEs; To develop recommendations on good practice in communicating to global audiences during PHEs; and To build an “economic case”, which can be used to convince other sectors such as Ministries of Finance regarding the importance of investing in PHE preparedness and response capacities, including risk communication
-
To identify the challenges for national authorities in informing diverse audiences beyond their country’s borders during PHEs; To develop recommendations on good practice in communicating to global audiences during PHEs; and To build an “economic case”, which can be used to convince other sectors such as Ministries of Finance regarding the importance of investing in PHE preparedness and response capacities, including risk communication
-
High-level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage (UHC): UHC as a Tool to Combat Infectious Diseases (30 – 31 May 2018, Tokyo, Japan) ASEF Public Health Network and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan are co-hosting a multi-country. The overall aim of this High-level Meeting is to facilitate agreement between governments and other stakeholders on practical actions to ensure access to effective treatment of infectious diseases, while reducing the risk of the emergence of AMR. The specific objectives are: To bring together officials with responsibilities for AMR and UHC and other stakeholders to explore the challenges they face in both ensuring access to antibiotic treatment, when needed, and reducing the risk of AMR; To identify practical strategies for integrating a concern for AMR into strategies for making progress towards UHC and for taking UHC strategies into account in national action plans for addressing AMR To agree on priorities for international cooperation between Asia and Europe to support an equitable and sustainable approach for addressing the challenge of infectious diseases.
-
To analyse and understand the various plans used for risk communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Coverage: Asia and Europe
-
The overall objective is enhanced biosecurity in South-East Asia achieved in a holistic manner through multi-sectoral involvement. The purpose of this project is to firstly provide a set of recommendations for improving biosecurity management systems in South-East Asia addressing: biosecurity awareness, legislation and guidelines, enforcement, high-risk biological materials and facilities, microbial forensics, physical and information security framework for facilities (taking into account emerging technologies) and information exchange. Secondly the project will provide effective tools to enhance capabilities to respond to highly communicable diseases or global catastrophic biological events, such as pandemics.
-
To identify difficulties to inform diverse population about PHE To discuss possible solutions to include migrants and ethnic minorities in ERC To develop recommendations on actions needed to inform migrants and ethnic minorities about PHE
-
To identify difficulties to inform diverse population about PHE To discuss possible solutions to include migrants and ethnic minorities in ERC To develop recommendations on actions needed to inform migrants and ethnic minorities about PHE
-
To identify the challenges for national authorities in informing diverse audiences beyond their country’s borders during PHEs; To develop recommendations on good practice in communicating to global audiences during PHEs; and To build an “economic case”, which can be used to convince other sectors such as Ministries of Finance regarding the importance of investing in PHE preparedness and response capacities, including risk communication
-
To identify the challenges for national authorities in informing diverse audiences beyond their country’s borders during PHEs; To develop recommendations on good practice in communicating to global audiences during PHEs; and To build an “economic case”, which can be used to convince other sectors such as Ministries of Finance regarding the importance of investing in PHE preparedness and response capacities, including risk communication
-
To identify the challenges for national authorities in informing diverse audiences beyond their country’s borders during PHEs; To develop recommendations on good practice in communicating to global audiences during PHEs; and To build an “economic case”, which can be used to convince other sectors such as Ministries of Finance regarding the importance of investing in PHE preparedness and response capacities, including risk communication
-
To analyse and understand the various plans used for risk communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Coverage: Asia and Europe
-
Regional Communication Planning
-
AMR Communication and Advocacy
-
Development of manual and booklets on technical activities
-
Development of regional guidelines for AMR surveillance in the animal health sector
-
Capacity building of national laboratories in implementing standardized and harmonized AMR surveillance methods in food animals in South-East Asia
-
Support to setting up of a regional AMR Technical Advisory Group (AMR TAG) for the animal health sector in South-East Asia
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “Strengthening the Emerging and Dangerous Pathogens Laboratory Network in ASEAN” is implemented by the World Health Organization (WHO);
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “Strengthening laboratory Capacity for EDPLN” is implemented by the ASEAN Secretariat in collaboration with Malaysia and Singapore’s Ministries of Health;
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “Strengthening ASEAN Preparedness and Response to Biological Threats” is implemented by Toronto-based BlueDot Inc. to enhance ASEAN regional capacity in big data predictive analytics, data visualization and methods for rapid data communication: established an ASEAN-customized disease surveillance web-application to generate risk assessment reports on disease outbreak for ASEAN Member States.
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “Strengthening regional disease surveillance networks” is implemented by Health Systems Research Institute (HSRI) in collaboration with the Asian Partnership on Emerging Infectious Disease and Research (APEIR), the Mekong Basin Disease Surveillance network (MBDS), and Connecting Organizations for Regional Disease Surveillance (CORDS)
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “Biosafety Engineering and Control for Health Laboratories in ASEAN” is implemented by Thailand’s Department of Medical Sciences (DMSC)
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “ASEAN Emergency Operations Center Network Development” is implemented by Malaysia’s Ministry of Health;
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “Strengthening Biosafety and Biosecurity” is implemented by Lao PDR’s Ministry of Health
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “Strengthening Response Capabilities for Emerging and Re-emerging Diseases” is implemented by the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine (RITM)
-
CANADA-ASEAN Mitigation of Biological Threats in Southeast Asia Project - “Strengthen Biosafety and Biosecurity Competency in South East Asia” is implemented by the International Federation of Biosafety Associations (IFBA).
-
Risk Communication Training (25 – 27 September 2017, Hanoi, Viet Nam) (with WHO & US CDC) ASEF Public Health Network (PHN) will launch its first training initiative on Risk Communications for Public Health Emergencies. Co-organised with the General Department of Preventive Medecine, Ministry of Health Viet Nam (GDPM - MoH), this training is designed for senior government representatives anticipated to serve as Public Information Officer within their countries' Public Health Emergency Operations Centers (PHEOCs). The training covered the basics of Crisis and Emergency Risk Communications, including the psychology of a crisis, stakeholder and partner communications, and the use of social media. Participants were actively engaged during sessions aiming to increase understanding for the Risk Communication components of Joint External Evaluation, as well as national planning. The training also introduced the concept of Joint Information Centre and its variation, and participants visited Emergency Operation Centre of the Ministry of Health Viet Nam at the end of the training. (Please see attached scope & purpose as well as programme for this conference http://www.asef.org/projects/themes/public-health/4208-regional-workshop-on-risk-communication-for-public-helath-emergencies)
-
Grant Agreement between the People's Republic of China and the OIE
-
Contribution received by the OIE in July 2015
-
Improvement of animal health situation in the AFEO region
-
Strengthening capabilities to develop and implement OIE international animal health and welfare standards
-
Improvement of Animal Health in Asia and the Pacific Region
-
Aligning activities to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at the global level
-
Aligning activities to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at the global level
-
Contribution received by the OIE in July 2015
-
Contribution received by the OIE in July 2015
-
Grant Agreement between the People's Republic of China and the OIE
-
Procuring antiviral drugs and personal protective equipment.
-
Stockpile management of the antiviral drugs and personal protective equipment.
-
Deployment of the antiviral drugs and personal protective equipment to ASEM member countries and its neighbouring countries responding to WPRO’s emergency request.
-
Aligning activities to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at the global level
-
Aligning activities to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at the global level
-
Aligning activities to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at the global level
- National Legislation, Policy and Financing
- IHR Coordination, Communication and Advocacy
- Food Safety
- Biosafety and Biosecurity
- Antimicrobial Resistance
- Zoonotic Disease
- Real-Time Surveillance
- National Laboratory System
- Reporting
- Workforce Development
- Preparedness
- Emergency Response Operations
- Linking Public Health and Security Authorities
- Medical Countermeasures
- Risk Communication
- Chemical Events
- Radiation Emergencies
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID)
- AFENET
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC)
- African Society for Laboratory Medicine (ASLM)
- Argentina, National Food Safety and Quality Service (SENASA)
- Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF)
- Asian Development Bank (ADB)
- Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)
- Australia
- Australia, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)
- Austrian Development Agency (ADA)
- BDC
- Better Health Moves Humanity Forward (PATH)
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)
- Brazil, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply (MAPA)
- Coalition for Epidemics Preparedness Innovations (CEPI)
- Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA)
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)
- Ending Pandemics
- EpiAFRIC
- EPPR
- European Union
- FAO Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD)
- Fleming Fund
- French Embassy
- Fundación Maris Llorens
- Global Affairs Canada (GAC)
- International Association of National Public Health Institutes (IANPHI)
- International Federation of Biosafety Associations (IFBA)
- International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC)
- International Regional Organization for Agricultural Health (OIRSA)
- Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
- Japan International Cooperation System (JICS)
- Mekong Basin Disease Surveillance (MBDS)
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM)
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH)
- OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID)
- PIP Framework
- Resolve to Save Lives
- Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
- The Service for the National Health for Food Safety and Food Quality (SENASICA)
- U.K, Department for International Development (DFID)
- U.N. Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO)
- U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
- U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)
- U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ)
- U.S. Department of State (DoS)
- U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
- U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
- United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S. CDC)
- World Bank
- World Health Organization (WHO)
- World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH)