P.6.1 Surveillance of foodborne diseases and contamination
1
P.5.1 Surveillance of zoonotic diseases
2
P.4.3 Prevention of Prevention of multidrug resistant organism (MDRO)
3
P.4.2 Surveillance of AMR
3
P.4.1 Multisectoral coordination on AMR
3
P.3.4 Antimicrobial stewardship activities
2
P.3.3 Strategic planning for IHR, preparedness or health security
2
P.3.2 Multisectoral coordination mechanisms
3
P.2.1 Financial resources for IHR implementation
2
P.7.1 Whole-of-government biosafety and biosecurity system is in place for human, animal and agriculture facilities
3
P.1.2 Gender equity and equality in health emergencies
1
P.1.1 Legal instruments
1
D.4.3 In-service trainings are available
3
D.4.2 Human resources are available to effectively implement IHR
3
D.4.1 An up-to-date multi-sectoral workforce strategy is in place
3
D.2.4 Syndromic surveillance systems
4
P.6.2 Response and management of food safety emergencies
1
P.7.2 Biosafety and biosecurity training and practices in all relevant sectors (including human, animal and agriculture)
4
D.2.2 Event verification and investigation
2
Recommendation P6
Develop comprehensive legislation and the associated set of regulations for managing biosafety and biosecurity, encompassing human, animal, and environmental health.
Finalize the draft Emergency Response Plan for responding to incidents concerning biosafety and biosecurity.
Conduct a training needs assessment and develop a training program on biosafety and biosecurity that includes development of curricula and a plan for the training of trainers.
Finalize the draft national policy for the management of waste, including dangerous pathogens.
Develop options and a national policy for the vaccination of laboratory health workers especially those dealing with dangerous pathogen (e.g. Hepatitis B, among others).
Recommendation Re1
Finalize and fast-track approval of the national Epidemic Preparedness and Response Plan.
Formalize arrangements between RPAZ and key stakeholders in radiation safety and IHR (2005), including memoranda of understanding with referral healthcare facilities, government agencies, and other relevant local stakeholders.
Formalize and document arrangements, including memoranda of understanding and cooperation, between RPAZ and regional and international bodies/centres for sharing capacities e.g. laboratories for testing and staff training.
Plan and conduct simulation exercises and drills on radiation safety.
Implement monitoring of consumer goods for radiation safety.
Recommendation R5
Develop an ‘all-hazards’ risk communication strategy and plan to be operationalized through the Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) and the other units dealing with communications in the MoHCC.
Map, assess, and build national capacity for risk communication at all levels under the One Health approach.
Establish a formal mechanism for rumour tracking/assessment and integrate it into an event-based surveillance and the risk communication plan.
Establish a national Technical Working Group on risk communication, with appropriate terms of reference and inclusion of all relevant stakeholders.
Recommendation R4
Review relevant regulations governing medical countermeasures and personnel deployment to determine what legislation may facilitate or restrict import or export of medicines and personnel during emergencies.
Based on the legal review, develop plans that outline systems for sending and receiving medical countermeasures and personnel during emergencies.
Develop or join regional and international partnerships for procurement, sharing and distribution of medical countermeasures and sharing of personnel during emergencies (e.g. the Global Outbreak and Alert Response Network - GOARN).
Recommendation R2
The National Emergency Operations Guide needs to be updated urgently, with technical support recommended to come from an experienced international consultant to recommend revisions to the Guide, as well as to train staff during an incident and organize an After-Action Review (AAR) exercise.
The EOC can rapidly become more operational by nominating and appropriately training a small group of key personnel from various relevant departments to deploy and fill critical EOC roles during an incident. Additional salary payments as an incentive may be necessary for this.
It will be critical to develop a routine practice of carrying out After-Action Reviews (AARs) and, for events that do not occur in the country, conduct at least one multi-agency simulation exercise annually. It is the systematic review of these After-Action Reviews and Simulation Exercises that are the ongoing opportunities to improve the function of the EOC.
Recommendation R1
Conduct a comprehensive multi-hazard and multisectoral national risk profiling exercise for public health emergencies.
Conduct a national strategic resource mapping exercise which includes stockpiles, staffing, and funding available for emergency preparedness and response.
Update the EPR plan considering the results of the risk profiling exercise and align the plan to cover all types of hazards as per Annex 1A of IHR (2005). Conduct simulation exercises/drills to test the plan.
Put in place a dedicated EPR contingency fund with SOPs for decision-making about usage (i.e. triggers for use), and how to allocate resources and replenish used funds.
Recommendation POE1
Conduct an IHR core capacity assessment for the designation of airports, ports, and ground-crossings using the WHO tool.
Develop emergency preparedness and response plans with associated SOPs specific to the designated points of entry.
Develop and implement a vector control programme at the PoEs in line with the WHO guidelines on Vector Surveillance and Control at Ports, Airports and Ground Crossings.
Deploy adequately trained and qualified personnel to conduct screening and emergency response at points of entry.
Periodically monitor and evaluate emergency response at PoEs through desk and after-action reviews, simulations, and audits.
Recommendation P7
Establish better local population estimates to calculate a more accurate coverage and reduce stock-outs due to poor forecasting.
Investigate reasons for children not being immunized and address these obstacles to reach the target coverage in all districts.
Review existing funding streams and create contingency plans to deal with the potential loss of external funding sources.
Reduce staff turnover by, for example, motivation packages (timely promotions, recognition of good work, performance awards).
Assure funding for maintenance of cold-chain.
Recommendation P5
Review and update food and food safety legislation which is outdated; and develop a national policy and strategy on food safety.
Enhance capacity of relevant sectors dealing with food safety by: - Timely recruitment, training, and retention of skilled personnel. - Participation of key stakeholders in international food safety fora. - Provision of logistic and operational support to enhance capacity for surveillance, lab diagnostics and responding to food safety emergencies. - Development of an integrated information management system and ensuring international accreditation of laboratories responsible for food safety.
Develop and implement operational frameworks based on the existing OIE PVS Gap Analysis that specify the actions necessary to promote safety of food products of animal origin.
Develop appropriate terms of reference and an MoU to facilitate and enhance coordination among agencies dealing with food safety.
R.1.1 Emergency risk assessment and readiness
1
Recommendation p4
Institutionalization of multisectoral collaboration to address zoonotic diseases by: - Establishing the “One Health” approach as formal policy in the country to cover all relevant aspects of the IHR including zoonotic diseases, food safety, and AMR. - Strengthening zoonotic committees at the various levels, and securing adequate and sustainable funding so that they function efficiently in supporting surveillance, lab activities, and a coordinated response through joint RRTs. - Develop an MoU between the ministries of health, agriculture and environment that document a ‘concept of operations’ and specify actions necessary to promote the One Health approach.
Establish an integrated information management system for systematic and timely information sharing and exchange between all relevant sectors.
Establish attractive recruitment and retention schemes for personnel trained and experienced in the One Health approach, especially veterinarians at the district level.
Recommendation P3
Implement the Zimbabwe National Action Plan on AMR prioritizing awareness creation, AMR surveillance, antimicrobial stewardship, and healthcare associated infection prevention programs.
Initiate the process of formally reporting surveillance data from all nationally designated surveillance sources/sites to the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS), as well as to relevant national entities within Zimbabwe as required.
Consider expanding AMR surveillance to additional pathogens (beyond the two currently under surveillance) as recommended by GLASS, through development of a costed plan for progressively expanding the number and scope of pathogens and surveillance sites, including antimicrobial residue testing of food animals meant for domestic consumption.
Share the recommended priority actions identified by the OIE Performance of Veterinary Services (PVS), and the OIE Gap Analysis and associated Action Plan, with all key actors and proceed to implement the recommended actions.
Identify and resolve bottle-necks and barriers to implementation of an integrated One Health surveillance system, including strengthening quality assurance and proficiency certification of all designated surveillance laboratories.
Based on findings from the Zimbabwe AMR situation analysis, establish working baselines, time-bound targets, and develop strategies for effective implementation of public awareness, professional education, and antimicrobial stewardship programs/campaigns.
Recommendation P2
Developing clear terms of reference and standard operating procedures to facilitate and guide the coordination, communication, and partnership-strengthening functions of the NFP with all relevant sectors and entities.
Develop a costed plan to ensure adequate government budget allocation to enable full functionality of the office of the IHR National Focal Point (NFP).
Develop an advocacy plan to ensure the active engagement and collaboration of all key stakeholders involved in the implementation of IHR (2005).
Develop a comprehensive roster of experts from agencies working on the various components of IHR, to draw on their expertise as needed.
Recommendation P1
Conduct a systematic and formal assessment of all relevant existing legislation, administrative arrangements, and regulations towards adjusting and aligning current laws, policies, and administrative arrangements to enable compliance with, and the full implementation of, IHR (2005).
Facilitate and expedite Parliament approval and enactment of the new Public Health Bill (2017), which includes provisions to support the implementation of IHR (2005).
Review and identify options for the possibility of creating a statutory instrument that will enable designation of the Inter-Agency Coordination Committee for Health (IACCH) as an empowered entity for facilitating full implementation of the IHR (2005) across all sectors.
R.3.1 Case management
1
R.2.4 Case management procedures are implemented for IHR relevant hazards
2
R.2.3 Emergency Operations Program
1
R.2.2 Emergency Operations Center Operating Procedures and Plans
2
R.2.1 Public health and security authorities (e.g. law enforcement, border control, customs) are linked during a suspect or
2
R.1.2 Public health emergency operations centre (PHEOC)
1
D.2.3 Analysis and information sharing
4
D.2.1 Early warning surveillance function
3
D.1.4 Effective national diagnostic network
2
R4: Average Capacities Score(%)
13
R5: Average Capacities Score(%)
44
PoE: Average Capacities Score(%)
30
CE: Average Capacities Score(%)
30
RE: Average Capacities Score(%)
30
Recommendation Ce1
Conduct baseline public health assessments regarding chemical safety.
Develop and operationalize a multisectoral national strategy and emergency response plan on chemical safety.
Develop relevant guidelines and manual on chemical safety management in the spirit of the One Health approach.
Strengthen capacity for chemical screening as points-of-entry.
Recommendation D1
Implement the national laboratory strategic plan and policy.
Develop and implement a plan for use of point of care diagnostic testing.
Develop and implement a national plan for reagents, equipment and consumables supply.
Agree on four core priority pathogens for surveillance testing.
Establish a sustainable funding mechanism for specimen transport.
Advocate for the establishment of a national lab accreditation body.
Develop and establish material transfer agreements for the movement of biological materials to external labs.
Assessment End Date
Recommendation D3
Establish a mechanism for systematic information sharing/exchange between the IHR National Focal Point (NFP) and, the OIE delegate; the focal points for food safety, radiation emergencies, and chemical events; the designated focal point for security.
Fast track the development and dissemination of guidelines and SOPs for reporting events of concern to WHO and OIE.
Conduct regular training and simulation exercises for national IHR focal persons and the OIE delegates, to continuously improve reporting of potential public health emergencies of national/international concern and zoonotic events.
Institutionalize and facilitate closer working arrangements between the zoonotic disease unit and their counterparts in human health.
Document thumbnail
Recommendation D4
Advocate to lift the hiring freeze and fill critical unfilled positions, especially at district/provincial levels.
Develop core competencies that all public health training institutions agree to achieve through their curricula.
Revive the basic Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP) or short-course field epidemiology training at the district level.
CE.1 Mechanisms are established and functioning for detecting and responding to chemical events or emergencies
2
R.4.1 IPC programmes
1
Recommendation R3
Develop MoUs and agreements at national and intermediate levels between security, public health, and other sectors for joint risk assessments, investigations, and responding to public health events of significance to issues of security.
Integrate aspects of public health and security coordination for identifying and responding to suspected biological incidents of deliberate origin into the overall EPR strategy, and then develop specific plans for potential biological threats.
Develop SOPs for joint risk assessments that include triggers for notification.
Involve security authorities in aspects of biosecurity and biosafety, including development of an inventory of dangerous pathogens stored in the country.
Conduct periodic exercises and simulations for response to deliberate acts that involve leadership from both public health and security authorities.
D.3.1 Multisectoral workforce strategy
3
R.4.2 HCAI surveillance
1
D.3.2 Human resources for implementation of IHR
2
Recommendation D2
Integrate reporting from other sources like media, rumours, and reports from traditional healers by organizing an event-based surveillance system.
Organize electronic surveillance system for animal health and make this interoperable with the system for human health.
Train and orient staff at regional and local levels when and how to interpret and act on data.
R.5.1 RCCE systems for emergencies
1
R.5.2 Risk communication
2
R.5.3 Community engagement
3
R.5.4 Communication Engagement with Affected Communities
3
R.5.5 Dynamic Listening and Rumour Management
2
D.1.1 Specimen referral and transport system
4
D.1.2 Laboratory quality system
4
D.1.3 Laboratory testing capacity modalities
2
RE.2 Enabling environment in place for management of radiological and nuclear emergencies
1
RE.1 Mechanisms are established and functioning for detecting and responding to radiological and nuclear emergencies.
2
PoE.1 Core capacity requirements at all times for PoEs (airports, ports and ground crossings)
Hazard and risk to countries can be determined probabilistically as a function of hazard, exposure, vulnerability and capacity. Current hazard/risk can be assessed based on country risk assessment reports, recurring events, current events in other countries and other sources.
Country Capacity
Country Capacity is the combination of the strengths, attributes and resources available within the country to manage and reduce health emergency risks and strengthen resilience. The International Health Regulations (IHR, 2005) require all WHO Member States to have the ability to detect, assess, report and respond to public health emergencies. Country capacities are assessed through the IHR Monitoring and Evaluation Framework, IHR-PVS National Bridging Workshops, health system data and related indicators.
National Plan
National planning helps to determine what actions should be taken in the coming weeks, months and years to prevent, detect and respond to risks and threats. Actions can be identified through all-hazards National Action Plans for Health Security (NAPHS), disease-specific plans, contingency plans and other sources.
Resource Landscape
Donors and partners can include Member States, intergovernmental organizations, development banks, institutes, non-state actors and others who provide financial assistance and/or expertise to assist countries in strengthening and maintaining capacities to prevent, detect and respond to public health risks and threats.