Skip to main content
Title Sort descending Pub Year Author SearchLink
Perceptions and perceived impact of graphic cigarette health warning labels on smoking behavior among U.S. young adults 2014 Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Legacy, Washington, DC;
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
Periodical, Abbrev.
Nicotine Tob.Res.
Pub Date Free Form
Apr
Volume
16
Issue
4
Start Page
469
Other Pages
477
Notes
LR: 20150422; JID: 9815751; OID: NLM: PMC3954425; 2013/11/08 [aheadofprint]; ppublish
Place of Publication
England
ISSN/ISBN
1469-994X; 1462-2203
Accession Number
PMID: 24212476
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article; IM
DOI
10.1093/ntr/ntt176 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
24212476
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration published a final rule requiring cigarette packages and advertisements to include graphic health warning labels (HWLs) with new warning statements. Implementation of this rule has been stalled by legal challenge. This study assessed correlates of smoking-related intentions related to graphic HWLs among current cigarette smokers and nonsmokers in a national sample of U.S. young adults aged 18-34. METHODS: Data were collected from 4,236 participants aged 18-34 using an online panel in January 2012 for the Legacy Young Adult Cohort Study. Analyses were weighted to provide nationally representative estimates. Our main outcome was assessed with a single item: "Do you think that new warning labels with graphic pictures would make you think about not smoking?" RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of the young adults were current cigarette smokers. Fifty-three percent endorsed that new graphic HWLs would make them think about not smoking (40% among current smokers compared with 56% among nonsmokers). Among nonsmokers, those aged 18-24, females, Hispanics, and those who were aware of graphic cigarette HWLs were more likely to report intention to not smoke related to graphic HWLs. Among current smokers, intending to quit within the next 6 months was correlated with intention resulting from graphic HWLs. Hispanic ethnicity and intention to quit within 30 days were strong correlates of intention in light, nondaily, and self-identified social/occasional smokers. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports previous findings that graphic HWLs play an important role in preventing smoking, in addition to encouraging cessation in young adults.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Villanti,A.C., Cantrell,J., Pearson,J.L., Vallone,D.M., Rath,J.M.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20131108
PMCID
PMC3954425
Editors
Perceptions of cannabis effects: A qualitative study among adolescents 2004 Chabrol, H., Ctr. d'Etud./de Rech./Psychopathol., Universite de Toulouse-Le Mirail, 31058 Toulouse, France
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Encephale
Periodical, Abbrev.
Encephale
Pub Date Free Form
/
Volume
30
Issue
3
Start Page
259
Other Pages
265
Notes
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
0013-7006
Accession Number
Language
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare perceptions of cannabis use effects and risks of tolerance effect, withdrawal syndrome, dependence and repercussions on school, social, and familial functioning among adolescent cannabis users and non users. Subjects were 210 adolescents (121 boys, 89 girls; mean age= 16.3 ± 1.3) from the department of Pyrénées-Orientales, France. Subjects completed a questionnaire assessing the frequency of cannabis use, the method of using cannabis, and including open-ended questions (What are the different methods of cannabis use? What are their pleasant and unpleasant or negative effects? What are their risks? Do you think that cannabis effects decrease in intensity when you are used to it? When someone is used to cannabis and stop using it (or has no more of it), does she experience craving for cannabis and withdrawal symptoms? What do you think of cannabis use?). Among the subjects, 118 (56.2%) were cannabis users and 92 (43.8%) were non-users. Among users, 27% used cannabis once a month or less than once a month, 21%, more than once a month; 24%, more than once a weeks; 6%, every day; 20%, more than once a day. The methods of using cannabis were joints (76%), bong (40%), pipe (23%), and ingestion (18%). Knowledge of methods of using cannabis was higher in users than non-users: joint (87% vs 64%, p < 0.0001), bong (69% vs 21%, p < 0.0001), pipe (38% vs 7%, p < 0.0001), ingestion (41% vs 13%, p < 0.0001). Fifty-four per cent of users reported that cannabis use induces pleasant affects versus 30% of non-users (p = 0.0006). They were exhilaration (47% vs 9%), relaxation (40% vs 23%), cheerfulness (21% vs 10%). Twenty-seven percent of users reported that cannabis use reduces negative feelings versus 14% of non-users (p = 0.02). To be more open to social relationships was mentioned by 13% of users versus 1% of non-users (p = 0.0001). The negative effects that were reported were attention and cognitive impairment (13% of users vs 5% of non users, p = 0.05), irritability (8% vs 8%), loss of control (8% vs 8%) and feeling faint (13% vs 6%, p = 0.09). Users reported than bong has much quicker and stronger effects than joints. The effects of bong class cannabis as a hard drug. Physical negative effects or risk were reported by 35% of users versus 30% of non-users (p = 0.44). Bong users described specific physical risks such as respiratory problems and fainting. No subjects reported the risk of road accidents. Most users and non-users considered that cannabis use causes dependence (60% vs 74%, p = 0.03), tolerance (68% vs 60%, p = 0.23), and withdrawal symptoms (76% vs 52%, p < 0.001). A minority of users and non-users reported that cannabis use causes a deterioration in school functioning (42% vs 20%, p = 0.69), in social activities (23% vs 14%, p = 0.10) and in family relationships (29% vs 20%, p = 0.14). Most of users (56%) had a global positive opinion of cannabis use whereas most non-users (66%) had a global negative opinion of cannabis use. The frequency and methods of use reported in this study compare with the results of a recent study carried out in another town of the south of France. These results suggest that a high proportion of French adolescents are using cannabis and that a high proportion of users utilize bongs. Perception of cannabis effects and risks of tolerance effect, withdrawal syndrome, dependence and repercussions on school, social, and familial functioning differed between users and non-users. Users have more positive beliefs and less negative beliefs about cannabis than non-users. Users reported more frequently pleasant effects and less frequently unpleasant or negative effects, physical risks, risks of dependence, deterioration in school, social, and familial functioning than non-users. However, only a minority of non-users reported negative effects or consequences of cannabis use. None subjects reported a risk of road accident. These results suggest that information on
Descriptors
cannabis, academic achievement, adolescent, article, attention deficit disorder, cannabis addiction, cognitive defect, drug effect, drug tolerability, drug use, faintness, family, female, France, human, human relation, irritability, leisure, male, normal human, perception, psychoanalysis, qualitative analysis, questionnaire, risk assessment, social aspect, social behavior, withdrawal syndrome
Links
Book Title
Les représentations des effets du cannabis: Une étude qualitative chez les adolescents consommateurs et non consommateurs
Database
Embase; MEDLINE
Publisher
Data Source
Embase
Authors
Chabrol,H., Roura,C., Kallmeyer,A.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Perceptions of health professional students regarding Waterpipe smoking and its effects on Oral health 2018
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad
Periodical, Abbrev.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
30
Issue
1
Start Page
90
Other Pages
93
Notes
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
Accession Number
Language
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
google
Authors
Shuja, Salman, Hussain, Azmina, Malik, Sofia, Rizwan, Tahir, Amin, Muhammad, Choudhry, Ziaullah
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Perceptions of hookah smoking harmfulness: predictors and characteristics among current hookah users 2009
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Tob Induc Dis
Periodical, Abbrev.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
5
Issue
1
Start Page
16
Other Pages
16
Notes
ID: 20021672
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
Accession Number
Language
en
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco cigarette smoking a well-known cause of cancer and other diseases. Hookah smoking is another form of tobacco use that has rapidly spread in the United State and Europe. This study assessed beliefs about the harmfulness of smoking hookah. METHODS: We surveyed hookah users in all cafes that provided hookah to its customers in downtown San Diego, California and nearby areas. A total of 235 hookah users participated in this study. RESULTS: Average age of study participants was 22 years, 57% were males, and 72% were not cigarette smokers. Whites were more likely to use hookah than the other ethnic groups (33%), older hookah users (26-35 years) were mostly males, and mint flavor of hookah tobacco was the most popular among a wide variety of flavors (23%). There was no significant difference in gender in relation to the wrong perception that hookah is less harmful than cigarettes, but those of Asian ethnicity were much less likely than other ethnic groups to believe that hookah is less harmful than cigarettes. More frequent users of hookah were more likely to believe that hookah is less harmful than cigarettes. The majority of hookah users (58.3%) believe hookah is less harmful than cigarette smoking. DISCUSSION: Compared to cigarettes, there appears to be a lack of knowledge about the harmfulness of smoking hookah among users regardless of their demographic background. Education about the harmfulness of smoking hookah and policies to limit its use should be implemented to prevent the spread of this new form of tobacco use.
Descriptors
Links
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2806861/?tool=pubmed; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1617-9625-5-16
Book Title
Database
MEDLINE; http://www.globalhealthlibrary.net/
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Aljarrah,Khaled, Ababneh,Zaid Q., Al-Delaimy,Wael
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach 2015 EHESP School of Public Health, EA MOS (Equipe d'Accueil en Management des Organisations de Sante), Rennes Cx, France.; Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK.; French National Committee Against Tobacco (CNCT), Paris, Fra
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Tobacco control
Periodical, Abbrev.
Tob.Control
Pub Date Free Form
Mar
Volume
24
Issue
e1
Start Page
e39
Other Pages
44
Notes
LR: 20151119; CI: Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.; JID: 9209612; OTO: NOTNLM; 2014/06/11 [aheadofprint];
Place of Publication
England
ISSN/ISBN
1468-3318; 0964-4563
Accession Number
PMID: 24920573
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; IM
DOI
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051513 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
24920573
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We explored, for the first time, young adult roll-your-own smokers' response to using plain packaging in real-world settings. METHODS: Naturalistic research was employed, where 133 French young adult smokers (18-25 years of age) used plain roll-your-own packs for 10 days; the plain packs they were provided with contained their usual brand of rolling tobacco and displayed the name of their usual brand. Participants were recruited in five cities in France (Paris, Marseille, Metz, Nantes, Toulouse) and completed two questionnaires to measure their response to their own branded packs and the plain packs. Both questionnaires assessed pack perceptions, brand attachment, product perceptions (eg, taste, quality, natural), feelings about smoking (satisfying, pleasurable), feelings when using the pack in front of others (embarrassment, image), warning response (credibility, awareness of risks) and smoking-related behaviour (eg, consumption, quitting). RESULTS: Compared to their own fully branded packs, plain packs were associated with less positive pack and product perceptions, lower brand attachment and less positive feelings about smoking and feelings when using the pack in front of others. Participants were also more likely to report feeling like reducing consumption and quitting when using the plain packs, and more likely to feel like missing out on rolling a cigarette. No significant differences between the two pack types (plain and branded) were found in terms of credibility of warnings and perceptions of level of tar. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that the impacts of plain packaging for roll-your-own cigarette smokers are the same as for smokers of factory-made cigarettes.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Gallopel-Morvan,K., Moodie,C., Eker,F., Beguinot,E., Martinet,Y.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20140611
PMCID
Editors
Perceptions of relative risk of disease and addiction from cigarettes and snus 2014 Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).; Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors
Periodical, Abbrev.
Psychol.Addict.Behav.
Pub Date Free Form
Jun
Volume
28
Issue
2
Start Page
367
Other Pages
375
Notes
JID: 8802734; 2013/05/06 [aheadofprint]; ppublish
Place of Publication
United States
ISSN/ISBN
1939-1501; 0893-164X
Accession Number
PMID: 23647153
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article; IM
DOI
10.1037/a0032657 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
23647153
Abstract
The public is largely unaware of the lower global risk associated with snus compared with that of cigarettes, but little is known of perceptions of relative risks for specific diseases. Inveterate, daily, and nondaily smokers' perceptions of the relative snus/cigarette risk of cardiovascular disease, and of cancer of the lung, stomach, and oral cavity, and perceptions among smokers, snus users, and dual users of the relative risk of nicotine addiction, was studied in a pooled sample from annual national surveys (2008-2011) performed by Statistics Norway. The total sample included 2,661 ever smokers and snus users aged 15-79 years old. Fifty-three percent were men, and the average age was 46.1 year. Compared with medical consensus, all smoker groups overestimated the relative risks of diseases from snus use, and inveterate smokers overestimated them significantly more than other groups. For all diseases except lung cancer, the majority of smokers thought snus users were running a higher or equal risk. For lung cancer, 22% believed that snus use gave a higher or equal risk. Smokers, snus users, and dual users tended to think that snus and cigarettes were equally addictive products, while a somewhat higher proportion of those who had quit both products thought that cigarettes were more addictive. Increased knowledge of the relative health risks might give smokers an incitement to switch to snus and prompt current dual users to stop smoking completely. Awareness could be improved by tailoring information at targeted groups, for example via the health care system.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Lund,I., Scheffels,J.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20130506
PMCID
Editors
Perceptions of the US National Tobacco Quitline Among Adolescents and Adults: A Qualitative Study, 2012-2013 2015 Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8100, Saint Louis, MO 63110. Email: waterse@wudosis.wustl.edu.; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.; Was
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Preventing chronic disease
Periodical, Abbrev.
Prev.Chronic Dis.
Pub Date Free Form
20-Aug
Volume
12
Issue
Start Page
E131
Other Pages
Notes
LR: 20160317; GR: P50 CA95815-09S1/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States; GR: R03 CA175571-01/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States; GR: U54 CA153460/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States; JID: 101205018; OID: NLM: PMC4556101; epublish
Place of Publication
United States
ISSN/ISBN
1545-1151; 1545-1151
Accession Number
PMID: 26292062
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; IM
DOI
10.5888/pcd12.150139 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
26292062
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco quitlines are critical components of comprehensive tobacco control programs. However, use of the US National Tobacco Quitline (1-800-QUIT-NOW) is low. Promoting quitlines on cigarette warning labels may increase call volume and smoking cessation rates but only if smokers are aware of, and receptive to, quitline services. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with a diverse subset (n = 159) of adolescent (14-17 y) and adult (>/=18 y) participants of a larger quantitative survey about graphic cigarette warning labels (N = 1,590). A convenience sample was recruited from schools and community organizations in 6 states. Interviews lasted 30 to 45 minutes and included questions to assess basic knowledge and perceptions of the quitline number printed on the warning labels. Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: available services, caller characteristics, quitline service provider characteristics, and logistics. Participants were generally knowledgeable about quitline services, including the provision of telephone-based counseling. However, some adolescents believed that quitlines provide referrals to "rehab." Quitline callers are perceived as highly motivated - even desperate - to quit. Few smokers were interested in calling the quitline, but some indicated that they might call if they were unable to quit independently. It was generally recognized that quitline services are or should be free, confidential, and operated by governmental or nonprofit agencies, possibly using tobacco settlement funds. CONCLUSION: Future marketing efforts should raise awareness of the nature and benefits of quitline services to increase use of these services and, consequently, reduce tobacco use, improve public health, and reduce tobacco-related health disparities.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Waters,E.A., McQueen,A., Caburnay,C.A., Boyum,S., Sanders Thompson,V.L., Kaphingst,K.A., Kreuter,M.W.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20150820
PMCID
PMC4556101
Editors
Perceptions of Turkish University Students about the Effects of Water Pipe Smoking on Health 2015 Faculty of Health Sciences, Yildirim Beyazit University , Ankara, Turkey E-mail : ndede@sakarya.edu.tr.
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
Periodical, Abbrev.
Asian Pac.J.Cancer.Prev.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
16
Issue
11
Start Page
4615
Other Pages
4621
Notes
JID: 101130625; ppublish
Place of Publication
Thailand
ISSN/ISBN
1513-7368; 1513-7368
Accession Number
PMID: 26107213
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article; IM
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
26107213
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The popularity of the water pipe, also referred to as hookah, narghile, shisha or hubble-bubble, has increased tremendously during the past few decades. This study was conducted to determine student water pipe smoking status and perceptions about the effects of water pipe smoking on health in a state university in Ankara. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2014 and January 2015. The data were collected with a questionnaire and "The Scale of Perception about the Effects of Water Pipe Smoking on Health". The data obtained were evaluated in IBM SPSS (version 20.0) statistical package program in computer. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the analyses by checking homogeneity of variances and Student's t-test. Values of p
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Sahin,S., Cinar,N.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Peri-implant clinical and radiographic status and whole salivary cotinine levels among cigarette and waterpipe smokers and never-smokers 2018
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Journal of oral science
Periodical, Abbrev.
J.Oral Sci.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
60
Issue
2
Start Page
247
Other Pages
252
Notes
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
Accession Number
Language
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Nihon University School of Dentistry
Data Source
google
Authors
BinShabaib, Munerah S, Mehmood, Abid, Akram, Zohaib, ALHarthi, Shatha S
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Periodontal bone height of exclusive narghile smokers compared with exclusive cigarette smokers 2016 Department of Dental Medicine, Fattouma BOURGUIBA University Hospital of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.; Research Laboratory N degrees LR12SP10: Functional and Aesthetic Rehabilitation of Maxillary, Farhat HACHED University Hospital of Sousse, Sousse, Tunis
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
The Libyan journal of medicine
Periodical, Abbrev.
Libyan J.Med.
Pub Date Free Form
30-Jun
Volume
11
Issue
Start Page
31689
Other Pages
Notes
LR: 20160728; JID: 101299403; OID: NLM: PMC4930549; OTO: NOTNLM; 2016 [ecollection]; 2016/03/21 [received]; 2016/05/31 [accepted]; epublish
Place of Publication
Sweden
ISSN/ISBN
1819-6357; 1819-6357
Accession Number
PMID: 27370513
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; IM
DOI
10.3402/ljm.v11.31689 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
27370513
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the periodontal bone height (PBH) of exclusive narghile smokers (ENS) with that of exclusive cigarette smokers (ECS). METHODS: Tunisian males aged 20-35 years who have been ENS for more than five narghile-years or ECS for more than five pack-years were recruited to participate in this comparative cross-sectional study. Information about oral health habits and tobacco consumption were gathered using a predetermined questionnaire. Plaque levels were recorded in four sites using the plaque index of Loe and Silness. The PBH was measured mesially and distally from digital panoramic radiographs of each tooth and expressed as a percentage of the root length. A PBH level = 0.70 was applied as a cutoff reference value signifying bone loss. Student t-test and Chi(2) test were used to compare quantitative and qualitative data of both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the ENS (n=60) and ECS (n=60) groups regarding age and the consumed quantities of tobacco (28 +/- 4 vs. 27 +/- 5 years, 7 +/- 3 narghile-years vs. 8 +/- 3 pack-years, respectively). Compared with the ECS group, the ENS group had a significantly higher plaque index (mean +/- SD values were 1.54 +/- 0.70 vs. 1.84 +/- 0.73, respectively). However, the two groups had similar means of PBH (0.85 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.86 +/- 0.04) and tooth brushing frequencies (1.1 +/- 0.8 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.6 a day, respectively) and had similar bone loss frequencies (15% vs. 12%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both ENS and ECS exhibited the same PBH reduction, which means that both types of tobacco smoking are associated with periodontal bone loss.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Khemiss,M., Ben Khelifa,M., Ben Rejeb,M., Ben Saad,H.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20160630
PMCID
PMC4930549
Editors