Skip to main content
Title Sort ascending Pub Year Author SearchLink
Comparison of Cytotoxic Effect of Cigarette and Waterpipe Smoking on Human Buccal Mucosa 2017 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.; Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
International journal of preventive medicine
Periodical, Abbrev.
Int.J.Prev.Med.
Pub Date Free Form
5-Dec
Volume
8
Issue
Start Page
98
Other Pages
Notes
LR: 20181113; JID: 101535380; OTO: NOTNLM; 2017/01/30 00:00 [received]; 2017/07/02 00:00 [accepted]; 2018/01/02 06:00 [entrez]; 2018/01/02 06:00 [pubmed]; 2018/01/02 06:01 [medline]; epublish
Place of Publication
Iran
ISSN/ISBN
2008-7802; 2008-7802
Accession Number
PMID: 29291040
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article
DOI
10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_62_17 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
29291040
Abstract
Background: The evidences on cytotoxic effect of cigarette and waterpipe smoking are very rare and controversial. The aim was to compare the cytotoxic effect of cigarette and waterpipe smoking on human buccal mucosa cells. Methods: The study was case-control. Feulgen-stained samples of exfoliated buccal mucosa cells were evaluated. The cytology slides of 25 cigarette smoker, 25 waterpipe smoker, and 25 individuals in the never smoked were examined. The number of pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis in 1000 cells/subject were counted. Exposing to cigarette and waterpipe smoke was considered by the number of pack x years. Results: There were significant differences among the groups in terms of karyolysis and pyknosis while there was no significant difference among the cigarette smokers group and waterpipe smokers group in terms of karyorrhexis (P = 0. 01). The cytotoxicity effect of cigarette smoking was not significantly correlated to time exposure (r = 0.099, P = 0.637). The cytotoxicity effect of waterpipe smoking was significantly correlated to time exposure (r = -370, P = 0.044). Conclusions: The cytotoxic effect of cigarette and waterpipe smoking on buccal mucosa cells was significantly higher than nonsmokers. The effect of cigarette smoking on cellular death was higher than waterpipe. The cytotoxic effect of waterpipe smoking was dose dependent.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Naderi,N.J., Pasha,M.P.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20171205
PMCID
PMC5738785
Editors
Comparison of CO, PAH, Nicotine, and Aldehyde Emissions in Waterpipe Tobacco Smoke Generated Using Electrical and Charcoal Heating Methods 2019
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Chemical research in toxicology
Periodical, Abbrev.
Chem.Res.Toxicol.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
Issue
Start Page
Other Pages
Notes
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
Accession Number
Language
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
ACS Publications
Data Source
google
Authors
El Hourani, Mario, Talih, Soha, Salman, Rola, Karaoghlanian, Nareg, Karam, Ebrahim, El-Hage, Rachel, Saliba, Najat Aoun, Shihadeh, Alan
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Comparison of CO, PAH, Nicotine, and Aldehyde Emissions in Waterpipe Tobacco Smoke Generated Using Electrical and Charcoal Heating Methods 2019
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Chemical research in toxicology
Periodical, Abbrev.
Chem.Res.Toxicol.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
Issue
Start Page
Other Pages
Notes
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
Accession Number
Language
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
ACS Publications
Data Source
google
Authors
El Hourani, Mario, Talih, Soha, Salman, Rola, Karaoghlanian, Nareg, Karam, Ebrahim, El-Hage, Rachel, Saliba, Najat Aoun, Shihadeh, Alan
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Comparison of CO, PAH, Nicotine, and Aldehyde Emissions in Waterpipe Tobacco Smoke Generated Using Electrical and Charcoal Heating Methods 2019 Mechanical Engineering Department , American University of Beirut , Beirut 1107 2020 , Lebanon.; Mechanical Engineering Department , American University of Beirut , Beirut 1107 2020 , Lebanon.; Mechanical Engineering Department , American Univer(TRUNCATED
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Chemical research in toxicology
Periodical, Abbrev.
Chem.Res.Toxicol.
Pub Date Free Form
6-May
Volume
Issue
Start Page
Other Pages
Notes
LR: 20190506; JID: 8807448; 2019/05/01 06:00 [pubmed]; 2019/05/01 06:00 [medline]; 2019/05/01 06:00 [entrez]; aheadofprint
Place of Publication
United States
ISSN/ISBN
1520-5010; 0893-228X
Accession Number
PMID: 31038931
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article
DOI
10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00045 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
31038931
Abstract
Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) has been characterized as a global epidemic. Waterpipe smoke has been shown to contain and deliver significant doses of many of the toxicants known to cause cancer, respiratory, and cardiovascular diseases in cigarette smokers. It has also been shown that the charcoal used to heat the tobacco contributes most of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and carbon monoxide (CO) found in the smoke, two major causative agents in smoking-related lung cancer and heart disease, respectively. Possibly as a result of growing awareness of charcoal as a toxicant source, electrical heating elements (EHEs) are being marketed for waterpipe use as reduced harm charcoal substitutes. We measured thermal performance characteristics (tobacco burned, total aerosolized particulate matter) and toxicant emissions in WTS generated using three commercially available waterpipe EHEs and charcoal to examine the hypothesis that EHEs can function similarly to charcoal while presenting a reduced toxicant profile. Toxicants quantified included total particulate matter, nicotine, PAHs, CO, and volatile aldehydes delivered at the mouthpiece when the waterpipe was machine smoked using a standard protocol. We found that while EHEs involved an 80% reduction in total PAH and a 90% reduction in CO emissions, they also resulted in a several-fold increase in the potent respiratory toxicant acrolein. These mixed findings underscore the complexity of toxicant reduction by product manipulation and suggest that marketing EHEs as reduced harm products may be misleading.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
El Hourani,M., Talih,S., Salman,R., Karaoghlanian,N., Karam,E., El Hage,R., Saliba,N.A., Shihadeh,A.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20190506
PMCID
Editors
Comparison of CO, PAH, Nicotine, and Aldehyde Emissions in Waterpipe Tobacco Smoke Generated Using Electrical and Charcoal Heating Methods 2019 Mechanical Engineering Department , American University of Beirut , Beirut 1107 2020 , Lebanon.; Mechanical Engineering Department , American University of Beirut , Beirut 1107 2020 , Lebanon.; Mechanical Engineering Department , American Univer(TRUNCATED
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Chemical research in toxicology
Periodical, Abbrev.
Chem.Res.Toxicol.
Pub Date Free Form
6-May
Volume
Issue
Start Page
Other Pages
Notes
LR: 20190506; JID: 8807448; 2019/05/01 06:00 [pubmed]; 2019/05/01 06:00 [medline]; 2019/05/01 06:00 [entrez]; aheadofprint
Place of Publication
United States
ISSN/ISBN
1520-5010; 0893-228X
Accession Number
PMID: 31038931
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article
DOI
10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00045 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
31038931
Abstract
Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) has been characterized as a global epidemic. Waterpipe smoke has been shown to contain and deliver significant doses of many of the toxicants known to cause cancer, respiratory, and cardiovascular diseases in cigarette smokers. It has also been shown that the charcoal used to heat the tobacco contributes most of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and carbon monoxide (CO) found in the smoke, two major causative agents in smoking-related lung cancer and heart disease, respectively. Possibly as a result of growing awareness of charcoal as a toxicant source, electrical heating elements (EHEs) are being marketed for waterpipe use as reduced harm charcoal substitutes. We measured thermal performance characteristics (tobacco burned, total aerosolized particulate matter) and toxicant emissions in WTS generated using three commercially available waterpipe EHEs and charcoal to examine the hypothesis that EHEs can function similarly to charcoal while presenting a reduced toxicant profile. Toxicants quantified included total particulate matter, nicotine, PAHs, CO, and volatile aldehydes delivered at the mouthpiece when the waterpipe was machine smoked using a standard protocol. We found that while EHEs involved an 80% reduction in total PAH and a 90% reduction in CO emissions, they also resulted in a several-fold increase in the potent respiratory toxicant acrolein. These mixed findings underscore the complexity of toxicant reduction by product manipulation and suggest that marketing EHEs as reduced harm products may be misleading.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
El Hourani,M., Talih,S., Salman,R., Karaoghlanian,N., Karam,E., El Hage,R., Saliba,N.A., Shihadeh,A.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20190506
PMCID
Editors
Comparison of cigarette and waterpipe smoking among pupils in the urban area of Sousse, Tunisia. Tunis Med. 2010 Jul; 88(7):470-3.(Letter to editor). Pro 2011
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Tunis Med
Periodical, Abbrev.
Tunis.Med.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
89
Issue
5
Start Page
505
Other Pages
6
Notes
ID: 21557194
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
Accession Number
Language
en
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
Descriptors
Smoking/epidemiology, Students/statistics & numerical data, Urban Population/statistics & numerical data, Bias (Epidemiology), Humans, Tobacco/chemistry, Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology, Tunisia/epidemiology, World Health Organization
Links
http://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/ghl/resource/en/mdl-21557194
Book Title
Database
MEDLINE; http://www.globalhealthlibrary.net/
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Ben Saad,Helmi, Chaouachi,Kamal
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Comparison of cigarette and waterpipe smoking among pupils in the urban area of Sousse, Tunisia. Tunis Med. 2010 Jul; 88(7):470-3. (Reply). Con 2011
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Tunis Med
Periodical, Abbrev.
Tunis.Med.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
89
Issue
5
Start Page
507
Other Pages
8
Notes
ID: 21557195
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
Accession Number
Language
en
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
Descriptors
Smoking/epidemiology, Students/statistics & numerical data, Urban Population/statistics & numerical data, Humans
Links
http://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/ghl/resource/en/mdl-21557195
Book Title
Database
MEDLINE; http://www.globalhealthlibrary.net/
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Harrabi,I., Maaloul,J. M., Gaha,R., Kebaili,R., Maziak,W., Ghannem,H.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Comparison of cigarette and waterpipe smoking among pupils in the urban area of Sousse, Tunisia 2010
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Tunis Med
Periodical, Abbrev.
Tunis.Med.
Pub Date Free Form
Volume
88
Issue
7
Start Page
470
Other Pages
3
Notes
ID: 20582881
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
Accession Number
Language
en
SubFile
DOI
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological and observational evidence suggests that waterpipe use is growing in popularity worldwide. AIM: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of cigarette and water pipe tobacco use among pupils aged 13-17 years in the urban area of Sousse, Tunisia and to identify the factors which predict current cigarette and/or waterpipe smoking in this population. METHODS: Across-sectional study was carried out on a representative sample of schoolchildren aged between 13 and 17 years in colleges and public secondary schools of the urban area of Sousse. We used a pre tested and self administered questionnaire to measure tobacco consumption. The significance level for all analyses was p<0.05. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS 10.0 software. RESULTS: Participants were 1569 youth. Fifty two percent of them were male. The mean age of the sample was 15+/-1.5 years. Total cigarette smoking percentage for ever and current use were 33.1% and 7.6% respectively. Total water pipe smoking percentage for ever and current use were 19.3% and 5.2% respectively. Overall, the total percentages of cigarette and water pipe smoking (ever and current) were higher for male and aged pupils. Multivariate regression analyses showed that the two types of tobacco use were related. CONCLUSION: Despite the growing adoption of water-pipe smoking, there remains limited research in this area. Increased surveillance and additional research are necessary to address this growing threat to public health.
Descriptors
Smoking/epidemiology, Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Prevalence, Tunisia/epidemiology, Urban Health, Water
Links
http://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/ghl/resource/en/mdl-20582881
Book Title
Database
MEDLINE; http://www.globalhealthlibrary.net/
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Harrabi,Imed, Maaloul,Jihen Maatoug, Gaha,Rafika, Kebaili,Raoudha, Maziak,Wassim, Ghannem,Hassen
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
Editors
Comparison of carcinogen, carbon monoxide, and ultrafine particle emissions from narghile waterpipe and cigarette smoking: Sidestream smoke measurements and assessment of second-hand smoke emission factors 2010 Aerosol Research Lab, Mechanical Engineering Department, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)
Periodical, Abbrev.
Atmos.Environ.(1994)
Pub Date Free Form
1-Jan
Volume
44
Issue
1
Start Page
8
Other Pages
14
Notes
GR: R01 CA120142/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States; GR: R01 CA120142-02/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States; JID: 9888534; NIHMS155344; ppublish
Place of Publication
ISSN/ISBN
1352-2310; 1352-2310
Accession Number
PMID: 20161525
Language
ENG
SubFile
JOURNAL ARTICLE
DOI
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.004 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
20161525
Abstract
The lack of scientific evidence on the constituents, properties, and health effects of second-hand waterpipe smoke has fueled controversy over whether public smoking bans should include the waterpipe. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare emissions of ultrafine particles (UFP, <100 nm), carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), volatile aldehydes, and carbon monoxide (CO) for cigarettes and narghile (shisha, hookah) waterpipes. These smoke constituents are associated with a variety of cancers, and heart and pulmonary diseases, and span the volatility range found in tobacco smoke.Sidestream cigarette and waterpipe smoke was captured and aged in a 1 m(3) Teflon-coated chamber operating at 1.5 air changes per hour (ACH). The chamber was characterized for particle mass and number surface deposition rates. UFP and CO concentrations were measured online using a fast particle spectrometer (TSI 3090 Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer), and an indoor air quality monitor. Particulate PAH and gaseous volatile aldehydes were captured on glass fiber filters and DNPH-coated SPE cartridges, respectively, and analyzed off-line using GC-MS and HPLC-MS. PAH compounds quantified were the 5- and 6-ring compounds of the EPA priority list. Measured aldehydes consisted of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, methacrolein, and propionaldehyde.We found that a single waterpipe use session emits in the sidestream smoke approximately four times the carcinogenic PAH, four times the volatile aldehydes, and 30 times the CO of a single cigarette. Accounting for exhaled mainstream smoke, and given a habitual smoker smoking rate of 2 cigarettes per hour, during a typical one-hour waterpipe use session a waterpipe smoker likely generates ambient carcinogens and toxicants equivalent to 2-10 cigarette smokers, depending on the compound in question. There is therefore good reason to include waterpipe tobacco smoking in public smoking bans.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Daher,N., Saleh,R., Jaroudi,E., Sheheitli,H., Badr,T., Sepetdjian,E., Al Rashidi,M., Saliba,N., Shihadeh,A.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
PMCID
PMC2801144
Editors
Comparison of barriers to cessation among Arab American smokers of cigarettes and waterpipe 2014 College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32604, USA. lhaddad@ufl.edu.; Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA. elshahawyo@vcu.edu.; School of Nursing, Vir
Source Type
Print(0)
Ref Type
Journal Article
Periodical, Full
International journal of environmental research and public health
Periodical, Abbrev.
Int.J.Environ.Res.Public.Health.
Pub Date Free Form
15-Sep
Volume
11
Issue
9
Start Page
9522
Other Pages
9531
Notes
JID: 101238455; OID: NLM: PMC4199033; 2014/07/15 [received]; 2014/08/26 [revised]; 2014/09/03 [accepted]; epublish
Place of Publication
Switzerland
ISSN/ISBN
1660-4601; 1660-4601
Accession Number
PMID: 25226410
Language
eng
SubFile
Journal Article; IM
DOI
10.3390/ijerph110909522 [doi]
Output Language
Unknown(0)
PMID
25226410
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examined the differences in barriers to cessation and reasons for quitting smoking among dual smokers of cigarettes and waterpipe tobacco, exclusive cigarette smokers and exclusive waterpipe smokers. Participants were Arab American adults residing in Richmond, Virginia, who were recruited from Middle Eastern grocery stores, restaurants/lounges and faith and charity organizations. The study yielded several key findings: (1) Exclusive cigarette and waterpipe smokers had similar mean barriers to quitting and were more concerned about their health than dual smokers. (F(2, 150) = 5.594, p = 0.0045). This implies that barriers to smoking and health concerns could be a function of the individual who smokes rather than the modality of smoking itself. (2) Exclusive cigarette or waterpipe smokers and dual smokers may have different reasons for quitting, since they have different reasons for smoking. The proportion of smokers who endorsed smoking as a messy habit as the reason among exclusive cigarette smokers was 0.37, whereas the proportion among exclusive waterpipe smokers was 0.04 and among dual smokers 0.39. The difference in proportions is significant, chi2 (df = 2, N = 154) = 13.17, p = 0.0014. In summary, this study supports the need to further investigate dual cigarette and waterpipe smokers, as the study results indicate greater barriers to smoking cessation in this group. Recognition and understanding of these barriers among dual tobacco users would be important for any future tobacco intervention among waterpipe smokers.
Descriptors
Links
Book Title
Database
Publisher
Data Source
Authors
Haddad,L., El-Shahawy,O., Ghadban,R.
Original/Translated Title
URL
Date of Electronic
20140915
PMCID
PMC4199033
Editors