Skip to main content

Changes to Prequalified IVDs

Changes to Prequalified IVDs


During the life cycle of an in vitro diagnostic (IVD), changes to the product, its manufacturing process or location, or the quality management system (QMS) under which it is produced may become necessary for technical or economic reasons. Such changes (referred to as "variations" by some regulatory authorities) to a prequalified IVD may range from minor, with little potential to impact the quality, safety and/or performance of the IVD, to substantial, and likely to affect the quality, safety and/or performance of the IVD.

A critical part of a manufacturer’s QMS is a documented, controlled and approved process to design, review, verify, validate (if appropriate), approve and implement changes. Indeed, to meet WHO prequalification requirements, the manufacturer must have an established, maintained and implemented procedure for categorizing and documenting any changes to the product and/or the QMS. This procedure must be described in the product dossier submitted for prequalification and demonstrable during the inspection of the manufacturing site(s).

For any planned change, the manufacturer must determine its significance with respect to the function, performance, usability, safety and applicable WHO requirements for the prequalified
IVD and its intended use. Changes applied to an IVD must be made in conformance with the requirements for control of design change according to ISO 13485.

Determining the impact of a change

The requirement to report to WHO regarding a change depends on the impact of the change on the IVD’s quality, safety and/or performance. The impact of a change should be determined for all changes. The change to the IVD’s overall residual risk evaluation may have arisen from:

  • actions including field safety corrective actions (e.g. recalls or changes to labelling) taken in relation to concerns arising from post-market surveillance of complaints and adverse events
  • redevelopment including state of the art product improvements
  • changes to a manufacturing process, facility or equipment
  • changes to the design or composition of the prequalified IVD
  • changes to the organization of the manufacturer
  • changes to the intended use and /or test procedure
  • changes necessitating new clinical and/or analytical data that raise new issues of safety and performance.

Consideration should be given to the impact of the change on the overall residual risk:benefit evaluation of the IVD as per ISO 14971. This includes a determination of whether or not the change:

  • introduces new hazards that have not been previously addressed
  • adversely affects the risk associated with existing hazards
  • alters the details of any of the information submitted for prequalification (related to dossier, manufacturing site(s) inspection, or laboratory evaluation), such as the intended use and/or compliance with the Essential Principles of Safety and Performance of Medical Devices established by the former Global Harmonization Task Force
  • affects the continued compliance of the quality management system with the relevant standards.

If the change is considered to be substantial, it should be reported to WHO. The steps in the risk analysis rationale used for determining whether a change is reportable or not must be documented.

Reportable changes

All substantial changes are considered as reportable changes. A reportable change is one that is demonstrated, through risk analysis, to have a potential impact on the function, performance, usability, or safety of a prequalified IVD. In addition, some administrative changes must also be reported.

Reporting of reportable changes is mandatory for all prequalified IVDs. It is the manufacturer’s responsibility to notify WHO of changes, in order to keep the prequalification status of the product up to date. Failure to report changes in accordance with WHO prequalification requirements may result in the delisting of the product from the WHO List of Prequalified IVDs.

Changes requiring a new prequalification application

If WHO considers that the planned change(s) will result in a product or application information of substantial difference to that which was prequalified, WHO will notify the manufacturer that a new application for WHO prequalification is required. WHO will also notify the manufacturer on the impact of the planned change to the prequalification status of the product. 

Change assessment fee

The cost of the activities (documentation review, manufacturing site(s) inspection, and dissemination of change information)required to assess a change will be covered in part by the manufacturer. WHO charges a non-refundable fee of US$ 3,000 for a technical or abbreviated review. Review will not begin until payment has been verified. No fee is charged for administrative reviews. Payment of the change assessment fee does not guarantee that the change will be approved. WHO also reserves the right to reject the proposed change(s) at any stage if the manufacturer is unable or fails to provide the required information within a specified time period, or if the information supplied is insufficient for completion of the change assessment.

Non-reportable changes

Minor changes associated with a prequalified IVD are non-reportable and do not require the submission of a change report form to WHO. Nevertheless, these types of changes, and the manufacturer’s justification for not reporting them, must be documented and controlled in the manufacturer’s QMS.

WHO guidance

Reportable changes to a WHO prequalified in vitro diagnostic (PQDx_121 v2, December 2016)

Prequalification assessment and change assessment target deadlines (PQDx_300 v1, 21 July 2017)


Change report form

Change report form for a WHO-prequalified in vitro diagnostic (PQDx_119 v2, 2 December 2016)


Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute guidance

Evaluation of stability of in vitro diagnostic reagents; approved guideline (CLSI EP25A Vol. 29 No. 20, 2009)


International Medical Device Regulators Forum guidance

(former: Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) documents are now located in the IMDRF “Documents” folder)

Essential Principles of Safety and Performance of Medical Devices and IVD Medical Devices (IMDRF/GRRP WG/N47 FINAL:2018)

IMDRF/MDSAP WG/N3 FINAL (Edition 2):2016 Requirements for medical device auditing organizations for regulatory authority recognition

IMDRF/MDSAP WG/N24 FINAL: 2015 – Medical device regulatory audit reports


International Organization for Standardization guidance

ISO 13485:2003 and 2016 ‒ Medical devices ‒ Quality management systems ‒ Requirements for regulatory purposes

ISO 14971:2019 ‒ Medical devices ‒ Application of risk management of medical devices


European Commission guidance

Reporting of design changes and changes to the quality system, Recommendation NB-MED/2.5.2/Rec2. Coordination of Notified Bodies Medical devices (NB-MED) on Council Directives 0/385/EEC, 93/42/EEC and 98/79/EC; 2000

Guidance for manufacturers and Notified Bodies on reporting of design changes and changes of the quality system. Notified Body Operations Group (NBOG), NBOG's Best Practice Guide 2014-3 


Health Canada guidance

Guidance for the interpretation of significant change of a medical device. Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, 20 January 2011


Health Sciences Authority of Singapore guidance

Medical device guidance GN-21: Guidance on change notification for registered medical devices. Revision 4.6. Health Sciences Authority of Singapore, May 2019


Therapeutic Goods Administration guidance

Changes or variations to therapeutic devices in the ARTG. Therapeutic Goods Administration, Australia, February 1998


United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) guidance

Deciding when to submit a 510(k) for a change to an existing Device (K97-1). ​Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), US FDA, October 2017

30 Day Notices, 135 Day Premarket Approval (PMA) Supplements and 75 Day Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) Supplements for Manufacturing Method or Process Changes. Guidance for industry and FDA staff. CDRH and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), US FDA, 16 December 2019

Modifications to devices subject to premarket approval (PMA) – The PMA supplement decision-making process. Guidance for industry and FDA staff. CDRH and CBER Manufacturing site change supplements: content and submission. Guidance for industry and FD staff. CDRH, US FDA, December 2018

General principles of software validation. Guidance for industry and FDA staff. CDRH and CBER, US FDA, January 2002

PMA (pre-market approval) supplements and amendments. CDRH, US FDA, December 2019

Real-time premarket approval application (PMA) supplements. CDRH, US FDA, December 2019