Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device

Close-up of a Copper-T IUD
RHL video

Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device

RHL summary

Community-based interventions and antenatal contraceptive counselling are likely to increase the acceptability and uptake of copper IUDs, which is one of the most effective reversible methods of contraception. Cost-benefit analysis and the long-term effectiveness of such interventions can be the focus of future research.


Cochrane review

This record should be cited as: Arrowsmith ME, Aicken CRH, Saxena S, Majeed A. Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD008896. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008896.pub2.

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective and are the most widely used reversible contraceptive method in the world. However,in developed countries IUDs are among the least common methods of contraception used. We evaluated the effect of interventions toincrease uptake of the copper IUD, a long-acting, reversible contraceptive method.

To determine effectiveness of interventions to improve uptake and continuation of the copper IUD.

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed,Clinical Trials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Open SIGLE. We also hand searched references ofrelevant reviews and included studies.

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled before and after studies of interventions which measured use anduptake of contraception including copper IUD as an outcome.

Two authors independently screened the search results for relevant studies and extracted data from included studies. We used RevMan5.1 to calculate Peto odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. We conducted meta-analysis bypooling data for similar types of intervention where possible. We used the GRADE system to evaluate the quality of evidence.

Nine studies representing 7960 women met our inclusion criteria, including seven randomised controlled trials and two controlledbefore and after studies that reported IUD uptake postintervention. We evaluated the quality of evidence as moderate to low. Threestudies on contraceptive counselling and referrals by community workers showed an increase in uptake of the IUD among intervention groups (Peto OR 2.00; 95%CI 1.40 to 2.85). Two studies on antenatal contraceptive counselling also favoured the intervention groups(PetoOR 2.33; 95%CI 1.39 to 3.91). One study on postnatal couple contraceptive counselling also showed an increase in IUD uptakecompared to control (Peto OR 5.73; 95% CI 3.59 to 9.15). The results of one study evaluating postnatal home visits and two studieson enhanced postabortion contraceptive counselling did not reach statistical significance.

Community-based interventions and antenatal contraceptive counselling improved uptake of copper IUD contraception. Since thecopper IUD is one of the most effective reversible contraceptive methods, primary care and family planning and practitioners couldconsider adopting these interventions. Although our review suggests these interventions are clinically effective, a cost-benefit analysismay be required to evaluate applicability.