"programme_id","programme_title","programme_language","programme_type","other_program","iso3code","country_name","program_location","area","status","start_date","end_date","brief_description","references","related_policy","new_policy","partner_gov","partner_government_details","partner_un","partner_un_details","partner_ngo","partner_ngo_details","partner_donors","partner_donors_details","partner_intergov","partner_intgov_details","partner_national_ngo","partner_nat_ngo_details","partner_research","partner_research_details","partner_private","partner_private_details","partner_other","partner_other_details","cost","fsector_0","fpartner_0","fdetails_0","fsector_1","fpartner_1","fdetails_1","fsector_2","fpartner_2","fdetails_2","fsector_3","fpartner_3","fdetails_3","fsector_4","fpartner_4","fdetails_4","fsector_5","fpartner_5","fdetails_5","fsector_6","fpartner_6","fdetails_6","fsector_7","fpartner_7","fdetails_7","fsector_8","fpartner_8","fdetails_8","fsector_9","fpartner_9","fdetails_9","fsector_10","fpartner_10","fdetails_10","fsector_11","fpartner_11","fdetails_11","fsector_12","fpartner_12","fdetails_12","fsector_13","fpartner_13","fdetails_13","fsector_14","fpartner_14","fdetails_14","fsector_15","fpartner_15","fdetails_15","fsector_16","fpartner_16","fdetails_16","fsector_17","fpartner_17","fdetails_17","fsector_18","fpartner_18","fdetails_18","fsector_19","fpartner_19","fdetails_19","fsector_20","fpartner_20","fdetails_20","fsector_21","fpartner_21","fdetails_21","fsector_22","fpartner_22","fdetails_22","fsector_23","fpartner_23","fdetails_23","fsector_24","fpartner_24","fdetails_24","fsector_25","fpartner_25","fdetails_25","fsector_26","fpartner_26","fdetails_26","fsector_27","fpartner_27","fdetails_27","fsector_28","fpartner_28","fdetails_28","fsector_29","fpartner_29","fdetails_29","fsector_30","fpartner_30","fdetails_30","fsector_31","fpartner_31","fdetails_31","fsector_32","fpartner_32","fdetails_32","fsector_33","fpartner_33","fdetails_33","fsector_34","fpartner_34","fdetails_34","fsector_35","fpartner_35","fdetails_35","fsector_36","fpartner_36","fdetails_36","fsector_37","fpartner_37","fdetails_37","fsector_38","fpartner_38","fdetails_38","fsector_39","fpartner_39","fdetails_39","fsector_40","fpartner_40","fdetails_40","fsector_41","fpartner_41","fdetails_41","fsector_42","fpartner_42","fdetails_42","fsector_43","fpartner_43","fdetails_43","fsector_44","fpartner_44","fdetails_44","fsector_45","fpartner_45","fdetails_45","fsector_46","fpartner_46","fdetails_46","fsector_47","fpartner_47","fdetails_47","fsector_48","fpartner_48","fdetails_48","fsector_49","fpartner_49","fdetails_49","action_id","theme","topic","new_topic","micronutrient","micronutrient_compound","target_group","age_group","place","delivery","other_delivery","dose_frequency","impact_indicators","me_system","target_pop","coverage_percent","coverage_type","baseline","post_intervention","social_det","social_other","elena_link","problem_0","solution_0","problem_1","solution_1","problem_2","solution_2","problem_3","solution_3","problem_4","solution_4","problem_5","solution_5","problem_6","solution_6","problem_7","solution_7","problem_8","solution_8","problem_9","solution_9","other_problems","other_lessons","personal_story","language" "6067","Integrated Nutrition Package","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","Urban| Rural| Peri-urban","on-going","01-2009","01-2013","
a) Prevalence of low birth weight reduced by 4 percentage point from 2006 level; b) Prevalence of underweight among children under 3 years of age reduced by 30%; c) Mean weight gain during pregnancy increased by 30 per cent from basline data to be established in 2009; d) Nutritional anaemia among children 6 to 24 months reduced by 30 per cent; e) Nutritional anaemia among adolescent reduced by 30 per cent;
","www.mri.gov.lk/nutrition
","","","","","","","","","","","","","National NGOs","Sarvodaya","","","","","","","Mainly by the UNICEF and shared with the Government, Ministry of Health","UN","United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)","Every other week for 4 months - 1 sachet per time
","Percentage of children 6 to 24 months with nutritional anaemia
","Quarterly and bi-annual review meetings at the district, provincial and national levels; External reviews at the mid-point of the project implementation; Final evaluation: During this phase, data will be collected and compared with baseline information. The same data collection techniques and instruments will be followed as in the baseline. The same group of interviewers will be re-trained before data collection and their work will be supervised at community level.
","","30.00%","","25%","not completed
","Sex","","","Adherence","","Supplies","","Communication","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Very good coverage of the programme with poor adherence continously. Mid term review did not show much improvement
","Sri Lanka is having mild anaemia with very less moderate and hardly any severe anaemia. MMN was tested globally in moderate to severe set up. This may be the reason we did not see much improvement compared to other countries.
","English" "6085","Weekly iron and folic acid supplementation (WIFS)/de-worming program","English","Community/sub-national","","VNM","Viet Nam","Yen Bai, Vietnam","Rural","on-going","01-2006","","Periodical deworming and weekly supplementation of iron was offered free of charge to more than 52 000 women in the province. The acceptance of the intervention and the nutritional outcomes were followed up. In March 2008 the programme was expanded to cover 250 000 and the management handed over to provincial authorities.
","Pasricha SR, et al. Baseline Iron Indices as Predictors of Hemoglobin Improvement in Anemic Vietnamese Women Receiving Weekly Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation and Deworming (2009). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81;1114-9.
Phuc TQ, et al. Lessons learned from implementation of a demonstration program to reduce the burden of anemia and hookworm in women in Yen Bai Province, Viet Nam. (2009). BMC Public Health.; 9: 266.
Casey GJ, et al. Long-term weekly iron-folic acid and de-worming is associated with stabilised haemoglobin and increasing iron stores in non-pregnant women in Vietnam. (2010) PLoS ONE 5, e15691.
Casey GJ., et al. Weekly iron-folic acid supplementation with regular deworming is cost-effective in preventing anaemia in women of reproductive age in Vietnam PLoS ONE [in print]
","","","Health","Provincial Health Department","World Health Organization (WHO)","","","","","","","","","","Research/academia","University of Melbourne","","","","","80 000 USD/ year initially provided by the University of Melbourne, as a starting up (including training activities and development of education material) after the first years the Provincial Health Department covered the running cost. WHO donated the deworming drugs.","Research/academia","","University of Melbourne","Government","","Provincial Health Department","UN","World Health Organization (WHO)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","6084","Acute malnutrition","Iron and folic acid supplementation","","Folic acid|Iron","","Women of reproductive age (WRA)","15-45 years","Yen Bai province","Primary health care center","","Weekly iron-folic acid tablets; 200mg ferrous sulphaet/0.4 mg folic acid
Deworming every 4 months with one albendazole tablet (400 mg) in the first year and 6-monthly thereafter
","Anemia prevalence
","Periodical prevalence surveys and compliance monitoring by the research and training centre for community development.
","52000 (In March 2008 the programme was expanded to cover 250 000 and the management handed over to provincial authorities.)","missing","","STH infection 75%","(after 30 months) STH infection 22%","Vulnerable groups","","Intermittent iron and folic acid supplementation for menstruating women>>>Intermittent iron and folic acid supplementation for menstruating women>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/iron_women","Adherence","Independent monitoring started early to be able to modify training and packaging","Financial resources","No solution","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","In March 2008 the programme was expanded to cover 250 000 and the management handed over to provincial authorities.
","English" "6085","Weekly iron and folic acid supplementation (WIFS)/de-worming program","English","Community/sub-national","","VNM","Viet Nam","Yen Bai, Vietnam","Rural","on-going","01-2006","","Periodical deworming and weekly supplementation of iron was offered free of charge to more than 52 000 women in the province. The acceptance of the intervention and the nutritional outcomes were followed up. In March 2008 the programme was expanded to cover 250 000 and the management handed over to provincial authorities.
","Pasricha SR, et al. Baseline Iron Indices as Predictors of Hemoglobin Improvement in Anemic Vietnamese Women Receiving Weekly Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation and Deworming (2009). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81;1114-9.
Phuc TQ, et al. Lessons learned from implementation of a demonstration program to reduce the burden of anemia and hookworm in women in Yen Bai Province, Viet Nam. (2009). BMC Public Health.; 9: 266.
Casey GJ, et al. Long-term weekly iron-folic acid and de-worming is associated with stabilised haemoglobin and increasing iron stores in non-pregnant women in Vietnam. (2010) PLoS ONE 5, e15691.
Casey GJ., et al. Weekly iron-folic acid supplementation with regular deworming is cost-effective in preventing anaemia in women of reproductive age in Vietnam PLoS ONE [in print]
","","","Health","Provincial Health Department","World Health Organization (WHO)","","","","","","","","","","Research/academia","University of Melbourne","","","","","80 000 USD/ year initially provided by the University of Melbourne, as a starting up (including training activities and development of education material) after the first years the Provincial Health Department covered the running cost. WHO donated the deworming drugs.","Research/academia","","University of Melbourne","Government","","Provincial Health Department","UN","World Health Organization (WHO)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","8875","","Deworming","","","","Women of reproductive age (WRA)","15-45","Yen Bai ","Community-based","","","Hookworm prevalence
","","250000","missing","","","","Vulnerable groups","","Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>>Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/deworming","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "9451","Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project ","English","Multi-national","","NGA","Nigeria","Nigeria","Urban|Rural","completed","01-2009","01-2011","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","STUDY DESIGNThe study consisted of an assessment using qualitative methodology. Within the focal area of FCT, four Area Councils were selected. First, the Area Councils were divided into urban/rural groups. Within each group, the “lucky dip” technique was used to pick two Area Councils. Within each selected Area Council, two urban and two rural communities were selected. Data collection was done at the health facility level. Health workers at the health facilities served as contact persons and mobilizers for respondents. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with key individuals in each of the communities, including traditional leaders, opinion leaders, community health workers, and community health volunteers. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were held amongst primary caregivers (mothers) of children under six months of age, primary caregivers of children between 6 and 24 months, grandmothers of under-24-month-olds, and fathers with children under 24 months of age.DATA COLLECTIONData collection instruments were developed for the target groups of the study. The instruments were pre-tested, on the basis of which some moderations were made. A methodology workshop was held to train the field officers and assistants a day before field work began. The training took place in the IYCN office in Asokoro, Abuja. During the training sessions, field assistants were taken through each instrument, and possible interpretations debated and agreed upon. Role-play sessions were also conducted. The workshop was facilitated by Dr Afolabi in conjunction with the principal investigator, Dr R. A. Okunola. Data were later collected at the different sites in FCT, coordinated by the principal consultant. Health officials of Area Councils to be visited were informed some days before the arrival of the study team, and necessary mobilizations were done. On arrival, courtesy calls were made to the traditional head and permission formally obtained for entrance into the community. Afterwards, the team proceeded to the health facility, where the various interviews and discussion sessions took place. Each FGD session was facilitated by a moderator and a note-taker while the sessions were tape-recorded. The collected data were transcribed and translated into English for the purpose of analysis.
","*
","","*","2 communities in 4 area councils of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja","","","","Vulnerable groups","","Infant feeding for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV>>>Infant feeding for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/hiv_infant_feeding","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Working closely with the government is necessary to achieve sustainability beyond the life of the project. We have involved stakeholders from the government at all stages of planning and implementation of project activities. This has enabled government ownership of our activities, materials, and products, thereby ensuring their continued implementation after project closeout.Effective collaboration with key stakeholders is integral to success. We involved nutrition, PMTCT, and OVC partners from the beginning, ensuring they wereincluded in all stakeholder meetings and collaborating with them on program implementation.Integrating materials for health facilities and communities ensures consistent messages for caregivers. We found that developing the facility and community-based materials concurrently resulted in consistency of key messages for caregivers and helped establish a two-way referral system between facility-based health workers and community workers and volunteers.A cascade training approach can help programs with limited resources reach more health providers. We found that training master trainers at the national and state levels and engaging with a wide variety of partners to leverage resources helps to reach a wider group of health providers.
","“IYCN is the organization we recognize for nutrition in this country. Anything concerning nutrition we assign it to IYCN and listen to what they tell us and bring it back to stakeholders, review it and adopt it. Most of the time it involves a lot of technical discussion [with IYCN].”—Oby Okwuonu, Assistant Director, Orphans and Vulnerable Children Unit, Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development“This program is different because the focus is on the community. Health workers are trained to involve community counselors. This allows them tobe closer to the community.”—Aishatu Amiwe Zango, State Nutrition Officer and Trainer, Jigawa“Despite having a limited budget, IYCN has been able to reach a broad audience by integrating important infant feeding messages into government-owned documents that will reach many levels through cascade training.”—Dr. Bamidele Omotola, UNICEF
","English" "9451","Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project ","English","Multi-national","","NGA","Nigeria","Nigeria","Urban|Rural","completed","01-2009","01-2011","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","STUDY DESIGNThe study consisted of an assessment using qualitative methodology. Within the focal area of FCT, four Area Councils were selected. First, the Area Councils were divided into urban/rural groups. Within each group, the “lucky dip” technique was used to pick two Area Councils. Within each selected Area Council, two urban and two rural communities were selected. Data collection was done at the health facility level. Health workers at the health facilities served as contact persons and mobilizers for respondents. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with key individuals in each of the communities, including traditional leaders, opinion leaders, community health workers, and community health volunteers. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were held amongst primary caregivers (mothers) of children under six months of age, primary caregivers of children between 6 and 24 months, grandmothers of under-24-month-olds, and fathers with children under 24 months of age.DATA COLLECTIONData collection instruments were developed for the target groups of the study. The instruments were pre-tested, on the basis of which some moderations were made. A methodology workshop was held to train the field officers and assistants a day before field work began. The training took place in the IYCN office in Asokoro, Abuja. During the training sessions, field assistants were taken through each instrument, and possible interpretations debated and agreed upon. Role-play sessions were also conducted. The workshop was facilitated by Dr Afolabi in conjunction with the principal investigator, Dr R. A. Okunola. Data were later collected at the different sites in FCT, coordinated by the principal consultant. Health officials of Area Councils to be visited were informed some days before the arrival of the study team, and necessary mobilizations were done. On arrival, courtesy calls were made to the traditional head and permission formally obtained for entrance into the community. Afterwards, the team proceeded to the health facility, where the various interviews and discussion sessions took place. Each FGD session was facilitated by a moderator and a note-taker while the sessions were tape-recorded. The collected data were transcribed and translated into English for the purpose of analysis.
","*
","","*","2 communities in 4 area councils of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja","","","","Vulnerable groups","","Infant feeding for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV>>>Infant feeding for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/hiv_infant_feeding","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Working closely with the government is necessary to achieve sustainability beyond the life of the project. We have involved stakeholders from the government at all stages of planning and implementation of project activities. This has enabled government ownership of our activities, materials, and products, thereby ensuring their continued implementation after project closeout.Effective collaboration with key stakeholders is integral to success. We involved nutrition, PMTCT, and OVC partners from the beginning, ensuring they wereincluded in all stakeholder meetings and collaborating with them on program implementation.Integrating materials for health facilities and communities ensures consistent messages for caregivers. We found that developing the facility and community-based materials concurrently resulted in consistency of key messages for caregivers and helped establish a two-way referral system between facility-based health workers and community workers and volunteers.A cascade training approach can help programs with limited resources reach more health providers. We found that training master trainers at the national and state levels and engaging with a wide variety of partners to leverage resources helps to reach a wider group of health providers.
","“IYCN is the organization we recognize for nutrition in this country. Anything concerning nutrition we assign it to IYCN and listen to what they tell us and bring it back to stakeholders, review it and adopt it. Most of the time it involves a lot of technical discussion [with IYCN].”—Oby Okwuonu, Assistant Director, Orphans and Vulnerable Children Unit, Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development“This program is different because the focus is on the community. Health workers are trained to involve community counselors. This allows them tobe closer to the community.”—Aishatu Amiwe Zango, State Nutrition Officer and Trainer, Jigawa“Despite having a limited budget, IYCN has been able to reach a broad audience by integrating important infant feeding messages into government-owned documents that will reach many levels through cascade training.”—Dr. Bamidele Omotola, UNICEF
","English" "9451","Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project ","English","Multi-national","","NGA","Nigeria","Nigeria","Urban|Rural|Peri-urban","completed","","","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","Behaviour change communication and/or counselling for improved complementary feeding was reported to the Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010
","*
","","*","National coverage","","","","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "9451","Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project ","English","Multi-national","","NGA","Nigeria","Nigeria","","","","","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","Nutritional care and support for people living with HIV/AIDS was reported to the Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010
","","","","National coverage","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "9451","Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project ","English","Multi-national","","NGA","Nigeria","Nigeria","","","","","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","Preventive treatment of malaria in women was reported to the Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010
","","","","National coverage","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "9451","Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project ","English","Multi-national","","NGA","Nigeria","Nigeria","Urban|Rural","completed","01-2009","01-2011","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","Distribution of insecticide-treated bednets was reported to the Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010
","","","","National coverage","","","","","","Insecticide-treated nets to prevent malaria and anaemia in pregnant women>>>Insecticide-treated nets to prevent malaria and anaemia in pregnant women>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/bednets_malaria_pregnancy","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "9451","Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project ","English","Multi-national","","NGA","Nigeria","Nigeria","Urban|Rural","completed","01-2009","01-2011","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","Deworming of children 0-2 years was reported to the Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010
","","","","","","","","","","Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>>Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/deworming","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "9451","Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project ","English","Multi-national","","NGA","Nigeria","Nigeria","","","","","IYCN worked with the FMOH, other relevant government ministries, UNICEF, WHO, and the many partners implementing OVC and HIV/AIDS programs in Nigeria with funding from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to improve the nutritional status of children less than two years of age and their mothers. The project placed special emphasis on increasing the chance that children born to HIV-positivemothers live healthy lives free from HIV. Efforts focused on improving the enabling environment for nutrition programs by reviewing and updating policy guidelines and training manuals and building the capacity of health workers.
From 2009 to 2011, the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Infant & Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) Project supported the government of Nigeria’s efforts to reduce maternal and child undernutrition and improve the HIV-free survival of infants and young children. IYCN provided technical assistance to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), the Federal Ministry of Women’s Affairs and Social Development, and other partners to review, update, and disseminate nutrition policies and guidelines, train health care workers in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and its surrounding area councils, and enhance behavior change interventions targeting HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed children.
The project also supported a quality improvement approach to strengthen nutrition assessment, counseling, and support (NACS) services at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and orphans and vulnerable children service sites in the FCT. As a result of IYCN’s role in Nigeria, the country adopted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) most recent recommendations on infant feeding within the context of HIV, and updated national guidelines were distributed to nutrition stakeholders across the country.
","Management of SAM was reported to the Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Protocol used: For now we dont have national protocol but we conduct trainings on the management of SAM using WHO Guidelines.
","","","","National coverage","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "11483","The MOST Project","English","Multi-national","","ETH|GHA|ZAF|UGA|ZMB","Ethiopia|Ghana|South Africa|Uganda|Zambia","Ethiopia|Ghana|South Africa|Uganda|Zambia","Urban|Rural|Peri-urban","completed","01-1997","01-2001","Background
Micronutrient deficiency adversely affects the health and economic and social development of individuals, communities, and nations. Given their high prevalence in developing regions, deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine have great public health significance.
Vitamin A deficiency weakens the immune system and, hence, increases the severity of infections. It is also the most common cause of blindness among children in developing countries. Iron deficiency anemia impairs immunity and reduces physical and mental capacities of populations. Iodine deficiency is the leading cause of mental and physical retardation in infants and children worldwide. As with vitamin A and iron, iodine deficiency increases the risk of death in newborns.
Programs that promote improved micronutrient status can alleviate the disability, morbidity, and mortality—particularly among young children and women—that are the consequences of micronutrient deficiency.
The MOST Mission
The MOST mission is to 1) maintain and enhance USAID's global leadership position in addressing micronutrient malnutrition, particularly vitamin A deficiency; 2) implement and evaluate state-of-the-art interventions to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies; and 3) provide technical guidance and coordination to other USAID projects with micronutrient-related components.
The MOST Strategy
The MOST strategy is built upon a framework of global and country-level results:
The global agenda focuses on 1) promoting a revised global agenda in collaboration with other organizations worldwide committed to reducing micronutrient malnutrition; 2) translating scientific knowledge into policy and program action; and 3) maximizing lessons learned through USAID’s extensive field program experience.
Country-level results address deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine: 1) vitamin A coverage of at least 80 percent of deficient children under 6 years of age; 2) moderate to severe anemia decreased by 30 percent in pregnant women and children 6–24 months of age; and 3) percentage of the population with symptoms of iodine deficiency reduced by 30 percent.
Country Activities
For micronutrient delivery at the country level, MOST’s role is to provide technical support to countries to guide the use of not only USAID funds, but also the full range of financial and human resources needed to eliminate micronutrient deficiencies from the list of public health problems.
In the design of country activities, MOST seeks the appropriate balance between supplementation, food fortification, and other food-based approaches to deliver micronutrients to at-risk populations in an effective, yet affordable way. Country activities are based upon analyses of a variety of relevant information:
—Prevalence and severity of micronutrient deficiencies
—Awareness of effects of micronutrient deficiencies
—Nutrition policies and programs
—Providers’ motivation, knowledge, and practices
—Food consumption data
—Production, distribution, and marketing of staple foods
—Estimates of the costs of alternative interventions
Key Areas of Activity
—Application of behavior change techniques to create demand for micronutrient programs and services
—Enhancement of the effectiveness and sustainability of supplementation programs
—Sound planning, implementation, and quality control of fortification programs
—Inclusion of other food-based approaches in programs
—Application of appropriate economic analysis to guide the evolution of country programs
—Use of monitoring and evaluation to improve program operations
—Development of public and private sector alliances to enhance the effectiveness of interventions
Target Groups
MOST focuses on the improvement of the micronutrient status of children under 6 years of age and women of childbearing age. Several intervention options available to address micronutrient deficiency, such as food fortification, will benefit not only those target groups, but also school-age children and adult males.
The MOST Team
The MOST team consists of five organizations led by the International Science and Technology Institute, Inc. (ISTI) as the primary contractor. ISTI's partners are the Academy for Educational Development, Helen Keller International, the International Food Policy Research Institute, and Johns Hopkins University.
In addition, five resource institutions have joined MOST for in-country implementation and technical tasks: CARE, International Executive Service Corps, Population Services International, Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, and Save the Children.
","Twice a year, at designated times, the three programs distribute capsules to children aged six months to five years. Each program follows a campaign model based upon intensified social mobilization and service delivery over two to seven days. The twice-yearly events have created a cadre of field-tested personnel in the three countries, who are skilled at working with the local communities and at promoting their support and active participation. All three programs have been associated with National Immunization Days (NIDs), a WHO global program to eradicate polio. Since NIDs were held annually, however, they provided an opportunity for only one dose of vitamin A each year. Because children with vitamin A deficiency should receive a supplement at least twice a year (every four to six months), another mechanism was needed for the second dose. Relying exclusively upon facility-based distribution to deliver the second dose was not a viable option for several reasons, but in particular because healthfacility attendance for older children was not high enough to ensure adequate coverage in the one-to-five-year age group.
In Zambia, the first non-NIDs vitamin A supplementation program was launched in August 1999, and later renamed Child Health Week (CHW) to make the focus on the child more explicit. It was also felt that, instead of limiting activities to a vertical vitamin A supplementation program, the opportunity should be seized to deliver an integrated service that included not only vitamin A capsules but also other health services such as de-worming, health education, immunization, family planning, prenatal care, and growth monitoring. Districts were encouraged to provide an integrated package of services commensurate with their local capacity and need — as long as vitamin A supplementation remained the core activity during that week. In Zambia, the first NIDs campaign took place in 1997, and was a nationwide undertaking. The program was scaled down to about half the districts in recent years. Since 1999, the focus has shifted to priority districts, where communities have been at a constant risk of cross-border polio infections due to civil-war-related migrations from neighboring countries. This narrower focus is referred to in Zambia as sub-NIDS.
The first round of vitamin A supplementation in Ghana was integrated into NIDs in 1996. By 1999, a detailed plan was developed to implement a nationwide stand-alone supplementation program for the second round. In 2000, the Ministry of Health (MOH) carried out the first vitamin A standalone capsule distribution in the country’s ten regions. Since that date, the program has become a two- to three-day stand-alone event used to deliver a second dose of vitamin A to all children 6 to 59 months of age. Volunteers from the Ghana Education Service, along with personnel from other decentralized departments, assist with the supervision and capsule-distribution effort. Community-based volunteers are in direct contact with caregivers and children and also work very closely with health workers, assemblymen, chiefs, opinion leaders, gong-gong beaters, and other community leaders to mobilize beneficiaries, administer vitamin A, and maintain distribution records.
In contrast to Zambia and Ghana, Nepal followed a phased approach to program implementation. Integration of vitamin A into NIDs in Nepal was initiated in 1997,
four years after a supplementation program was established in 8 of the country’s 75 districts. The second distribution campaign has since been phased in at a rate of eight to ten districts per year. By 2001, the program covered all but three politically unstable districts. Under the program, high-dose vitamin A capsules are distributed to all children aged 6 to 59 months during a twoday event.
","
Ghana
A monitoring team consisting of national, regional, and district supervisors carries out organized and random spot checks. Where necessary, vitamin A capsule administrators are assisted in performing their tasks. Capsule-distribution teams use all means of transportation available within the region and district, whether these be 4x4 vehicles, 2x4 pickups, motorcycles, or bicycles. MOH, district assemblies, decentralized departments, and local and international NGOs provide fuel and contribute to vehicle maintenance. At the end of each day, tally sheets are counted and summary sheets completed. Data are compiled by sub-district and district health management teams. After all figures are checked for accuracy, district coverage is calculated. District coverage data are sent to the regional nutrition officers and senior medical officers of public health, who compile regional coverage figures before sending them to the Nutrition Unit in Accra. Using regional figures, the Nutrition Unit estimates national coverage.
Zambia
Monitoring teams consisting of national, provincial, and district staff carry out systematic or random observations, depending on what they are monitoring. Where necessary, vitamin A capsule administrators are assisted in performing their tasks. At the end of each day, tally sheets are counted, summary sheets completed, and data compiled. District figures are then checked for accuracy, after which district coverage is calculated and the results forwarded to NFNC.
","Ghana: 3.5 million children ","Ghana: Exceeded target in May 2001; Zambia: 28 percent in 1999, 88 in Febraury 2002","","serum retinol levels of &lt;20 ug/dl,night-blindness prevalence,vitamin A supplementation coverage for children,subclinical vitamin A deficiency,","serum retinol levels of <20 ug/dl,night-blindness prevalence,vitamin A supplementation coverage for children,subclinical vitamin A deficiency,","Vulnerable groups","","Vitamin A supplementation in neonates>>>Vitamin A supplementation in neonates>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/vitamina_neonatal","Insufficient staff","In Zambia and Ghana, it has been somewhat more difficult to generate a consistent cadre of volunteers for the vitamin A distribution. In each country, districts mobilize health post and sub-health post staff, identify extended outreach sites (including clinics, schools, and community centers),and then recruit community members to assist them with their activities. In Ghana, this has been relatively successful since there have been adequate clinic staff and a manageable number of outreach sites. In spite of this, many districts have continued to do some house-to-house visits to ensure high coverage. In Zambia, it has been more difficult to recruit community volunteers, and the clinic staff have been stretched to cover outreach sites.","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Robin Houston (2003). Why They Work: An analysis of three successful public health interventions - Vitamin A supplementation programs in Ghana, Nepal, and Zambia
Background
Micronutrient deficiency adversely affects the health and economic and social development of individuals, communities, and nations. Given their high prevalence in developing regions, deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine have great public health significance.
Vitamin A deficiency weakens the immune system and, hence, increases the severity of infections. It is also the most common cause of blindness among children in developing countries. Iron deficiency anemia impairs immunity and reduces physical and mental capacities of populations. Iodine deficiency is the leading cause of mental and physical retardation in infants and children worldwide. As with vitamin A and iron, iodine deficiency increases the risk of death in newborns.
Programs that promote improved micronutrient status can alleviate the disability, morbidity, and mortality—particularly among young children and women—that are the consequences of micronutrient deficiency.
The MOST Mission
The MOST mission is to 1) maintain and enhance USAID's global leadership position in addressing micronutrient malnutrition, particularly vitamin A deficiency; 2) implement and evaluate state-of-the-art interventions to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies; and 3) provide technical guidance and coordination to other USAID projects with micronutrient-related components.
The MOST Strategy
The MOST strategy is built upon a framework of global and country-level results:
The global agenda focuses on 1) promoting a revised global agenda in collaboration with other organizations worldwide committed to reducing micronutrient malnutrition; 2) translating scientific knowledge into policy and program action; and 3) maximizing lessons learned through USAID’s extensive field program experience.
Country-level results address deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine: 1) vitamin A coverage of at least 80 percent of deficient children under 6 years of age; 2) moderate to severe anemia decreased by 30 percent in pregnant women and children 6–24 months of age; and 3) percentage of the population with symptoms of iodine deficiency reduced by 30 percent.
Country Activities
For micronutrient delivery at the country level, MOST’s role is to provide technical support to countries to guide the use of not only USAID funds, but also the full range of financial and human resources needed to eliminate micronutrient deficiencies from the list of public health problems.
In the design of country activities, MOST seeks the appropriate balance between supplementation, food fortification, and other food-based approaches to deliver micronutrients to at-risk populations in an effective, yet affordable way. Country activities are based upon analyses of a variety of relevant information:
—Prevalence and severity of micronutrient deficiencies
—Awareness of effects of micronutrient deficiencies
—Nutrition policies and programs
—Providers’ motivation, knowledge, and practices
—Food consumption data
—Production, distribution, and marketing of staple foods
—Estimates of the costs of alternative interventions
Key Areas of Activity
—Application of behavior change techniques to create demand for micronutrient programs and services
—Enhancement of the effectiveness and sustainability of supplementation programs
—Sound planning, implementation, and quality control of fortification programs
—Inclusion of other food-based approaches in programs
—Application of appropriate economic analysis to guide the evolution of country programs
—Use of monitoring and evaluation to improve program operations
—Development of public and private sector alliances to enhance the effectiveness of interventions
Target Groups
MOST focuses on the improvement of the micronutrient status of children under 6 years of age and women of childbearing age. Several intervention options available to address micronutrient deficiency, such as food fortification, will benefit not only those target groups, but also school-age children and adult males.
The MOST Team
The MOST team consists of five organizations led by the International Science and Technology Institute, Inc. (ISTI) as the primary contractor. ISTI's partners are the Academy for Educational Development, Helen Keller International, the International Food Policy Research Institute, and Johns Hopkins University.
In addition, five resource institutions have joined MOST for in-country implementation and technical tasks: CARE, International Executive Service Corps, Population Services International, Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, and Save the Children.
","Five data collection methods were used:
During the fieldwork, the enumerators worked in pairs. The enumerators were not allowed to use the instruments in the facilities where they worked. Each pair spent a full day at a health facility. Field supervisors supported the enumerators during the data collection and checked the questionnaires for consistency and completeness. This was to ensure that the data collected was accurate as possible.
","""""Many pregnant mothers do not come to ANC because they had several normal pregnancies and think all will continue to go on well always.”
- Health worker, Apac
“ The health worker at the health centre is very rude, she has no time for us; so we fear even asking questions or discussing any issue about our health. So I go all the way to Naguru health clinic and only here if I have no money for transport.”
- A pregnant woman, Kojja, Mukono
“ I think these tablets for blood should be given only to pregnant women who have no blood. It may cause a high blood level and lead to high blood pressure.”
- TBAs, Kyampisi
“ Women with increased blood should not take these tablets (iron and folic acids) because their heartbeats will increase and they will sweat very much.”
- TBAs, Seeta Nazigo
“ Some mothers say it smells and they throw away the tablets soon after the clinic.”
- Pregnant mothers, Kojja
“ Some mothers do not like taking tablets when they are pregnant.”
- Pregnant mothers, Seeta Nazigo
Background
Micronutrient deficiency adversely affects the health and economic and social development of individuals, communities, and nations. Given their high prevalence in developing regions, deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine have great public health significance.
Vitamin A deficiency weakens the immune system and, hence, increases the severity of infections. It is also the most common cause of blindness among children in developing countries. Iron deficiency anemia impairs immunity and reduces physical and mental capacities of populations. Iodine deficiency is the leading cause of mental and physical retardation in infants and children worldwide. As with vitamin A and iron, iodine deficiency increases the risk of death in newborns.
Programs that promote improved micronutrient status can alleviate the disability, morbidity, and mortality—particularly among young children and women—that are the consequences of micronutrient deficiency.
The MOST Mission
The MOST mission is to 1) maintain and enhance USAID's global leadership position in addressing micronutrient malnutrition, particularly vitamin A deficiency; 2) implement and evaluate state-of-the-art interventions to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies; and 3) provide technical guidance and coordination to other USAID projects with micronutrient-related components.
The MOST Strategy
The MOST strategy is built upon a framework of global and country-level results:
The global agenda focuses on 1) promoting a revised global agenda in collaboration with other organizations worldwide committed to reducing micronutrient malnutrition; 2) translating scientific knowledge into policy and program action; and 3) maximizing lessons learned through USAID’s extensive field program experience.
Country-level results address deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine: 1) vitamin A coverage of at least 80 percent of deficient children under 6 years of age; 2) moderate to severe anemia decreased by 30 percent in pregnant women and children 6–24 months of age; and 3) percentage of the population with symptoms of iodine deficiency reduced by 30 percent.
Country Activities
For micronutrient delivery at the country level, MOST’s role is to provide technical support to countries to guide the use of not only USAID funds, but also the full range of financial and human resources needed to eliminate micronutrient deficiencies from the list of public health problems.
In the design of country activities, MOST seeks the appropriate balance between supplementation, food fortification, and other food-based approaches to deliver micronutrients to at-risk populations in an effective, yet affordable way. Country activities are based upon analyses of a variety of relevant information:
—Prevalence and severity of micronutrient deficiencies
—Awareness of effects of micronutrient deficiencies
—Nutrition policies and programs
—Providers’ motivation, knowledge, and practices
—Food consumption data
—Production, distribution, and marketing of staple foods
—Estimates of the costs of alternative interventions
Key Areas of Activity
—Application of behavior change techniques to create demand for micronutrient programs and services
—Enhancement of the effectiveness and sustainability of supplementation programs
—Sound planning, implementation, and quality control of fortification programs
—Inclusion of other food-based approaches in programs
—Application of appropriate economic analysis to guide the evolution of country programs
—Use of monitoring and evaluation to improve program operations
—Development of public and private sector alliances to enhance the effectiveness of interventions
Target Groups
MOST focuses on the improvement of the micronutrient status of children under 6 years of age and women of childbearing age. Several intervention options available to address micronutrient deficiency, such as food fortification, will benefit not only those target groups, but also school-age children and adult males.
The MOST Team
The MOST team consists of five organizations led by the International Science and Technology Institute, Inc. (ISTI) as the primary contractor. ISTI's partners are the Academy for Educational Development, Helen Keller International, the International Food Policy Research Institute, and Johns Hopkins University.
In addition, five resource institutions have joined MOST for in-country implementation and technical tasks: CARE, International Executive Service Corps, Population Services International, Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, and Save the Children.
","Ethiopia
MOST is providing technical and implementation support to the Ministry of Health in the development of a national micronutrient program. The program is a cooperative effort between the MOH, USAID/Ethiopia, MOST, and UNICEF. Program components include strengthening of the newly formed nutrition division at the MOH and the micronutrient committee; development of a locally designed vitamin A supplementation strategy and its pilot test; support for initial trials of vitamin A sugar fortification in one of the country's four sugar factories; and support for information, education, and communication activities.
South Africa
MOST is working with counterparts at the University of the Western Cape (UWC) to support and strengthen a new vitamin A supplementation program being started by the Department of Health in Eastern Cape province. MOST is also supporting a pilot initiative by UWC that aims to incorporate micronutrient interventions into the Eastern Cape Integrated Nutrition Program.
.
","","","","","","","Vulnerable groups","","Vitamin A supplementation in neonates>>>Vitamin A supplementation in neonates>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/vitamina_neonatal","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "11483","The MOST Project","English","Multi-national","","ETH|GHA|ZAF|UGA|ZMB","Ethiopia|Ghana|South Africa|Uganda|Zambia","Ethiopia|Ghana|South Africa|Uganda|Zambia","Urban|Rural|Peri-urban","completed","01-1997","01-2001","Background
Micronutrient deficiency adversely affects the health and economic and social development of individuals, communities, and nations. Given their high prevalence in developing regions, deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine have great public health significance.
Vitamin A deficiency weakens the immune system and, hence, increases the severity of infections. It is also the most common cause of blindness among children in developing countries. Iron deficiency anemia impairs immunity and reduces physical and mental capacities of populations. Iodine deficiency is the leading cause of mental and physical retardation in infants and children worldwide. As with vitamin A and iron, iodine deficiency increases the risk of death in newborns.
Programs that promote improved micronutrient status can alleviate the disability, morbidity, and mortality—particularly among young children and women—that are the consequences of micronutrient deficiency.
The MOST Mission
The MOST mission is to 1) maintain and enhance USAID's global leadership position in addressing micronutrient malnutrition, particularly vitamin A deficiency; 2) implement and evaluate state-of-the-art interventions to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies; and 3) provide technical guidance and coordination to other USAID projects with micronutrient-related components.
The MOST Strategy
The MOST strategy is built upon a framework of global and country-level results:
The global agenda focuses on 1) promoting a revised global agenda in collaboration with other organizations worldwide committed to reducing micronutrient malnutrition; 2) translating scientific knowledge into policy and program action; and 3) maximizing lessons learned through USAID’s extensive field program experience.
Country-level results address deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine: 1) vitamin A coverage of at least 80 percent of deficient children under 6 years of age; 2) moderate to severe anemia decreased by 30 percent in pregnant women and children 6–24 months of age; and 3) percentage of the population with symptoms of iodine deficiency reduced by 30 percent.
Country Activities
For micronutrient delivery at the country level, MOST’s role is to provide technical support to countries to guide the use of not only USAID funds, but also the full range of financial and human resources needed to eliminate micronutrient deficiencies from the list of public health problems.
In the design of country activities, MOST seeks the appropriate balance between supplementation, food fortification, and other food-based approaches to deliver micronutrients to at-risk populations in an effective, yet affordable way. Country activities are based upon analyses of a variety of relevant information:
—Prevalence and severity of micronutrient deficiencies
—Awareness of effects of micronutrient deficiencies
—Nutrition policies and programs
—Providers’ motivation, knowledge, and practices
—Food consumption data
—Production, distribution, and marketing of staple foods
—Estimates of the costs of alternative interventions
Key Areas of Activity
—Application of behavior change techniques to create demand for micronutrient programs and services
—Enhancement of the effectiveness and sustainability of supplementation programs
—Sound planning, implementation, and quality control of fortification programs
—Inclusion of other food-based approaches in programs
—Application of appropriate economic analysis to guide the evolution of country programs
—Use of monitoring and evaluation to improve program operations
—Development of public and private sector alliances to enhance the effectiveness of interventions
Target Groups
MOST focuses on the improvement of the micronutrient status of children under 6 years of age and women of childbearing age. Several intervention options available to address micronutrient deficiency, such as food fortification, will benefit not only those target groups, but also school-age children and adult males.
The MOST Team
The MOST team consists of five organizations led by the International Science and Technology Institute, Inc. (ISTI) as the primary contractor. ISTI's partners are the Academy for Educational Development, Helen Keller International, the International Food Policy Research Institute, and Johns Hopkins University.
In addition, five resource institutions have joined MOST for in-country implementation and technical tasks: CARE, International Executive Service Corps, Population Services International, Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, and Save the Children.
","Government agencies encouraged the initial development of fortification: NFNC promoted initial research, sponsored meetings, and coordinated activities related to fortification; MOH researched the legal framework; the National Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research (NISIR) provided technical guidance; the Food and Drug Control Laboratory (FDCL) conducted monitoring and evaluation; and the Zambian Revenue Authority (ZRA) examined the tax structure. Industry acceptance allowed planning to begin, but donor support was critical to the development of the program: the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) was the lead financer of the project and provided technical assistance, UNICEF provided spare parts, and the Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA) provided spectrophotometers for Zambia Sugar and the FDCL.
While legislation was still being developed, Zambia Sugar went ahead with the launch of fortified Whitespoon Sugar on May 15, 1998. Zambia Sugar began its fortification program at 15 mg/kg, but cost considerations led the company to reduce the level to 10 mg/kg within three months. In May 1997, one year before fortification began, a consultant estimated the cost of fortifying 100,000 metric tons of sugar at 16 mg/kg to be around $1 million U.S., while fortifying at 20 mg/kg would cost almost $1.25 million.24 Reducing the level from 16 to 10 mg/kg could thus have reduced costs by approximately $375,000 a year.
","Modified Relative Dose Response Test (MRDR) in children
","The first outside tests of fortificant levels in sugar were controversial. Four months after the launch of fortified sugar, a team consisting of representatives from the MOH, the NFNC, and NISIR visited the Zambia Sugar mill. The team tested samples from the mill at the FDCL; these tests showed far lower levels of vitamin A than those shown in tests by Zambia Sugar. The government’s tests indicated a range of 0–13.6 mg/kg, while Zambia Sugar’s tests indicated a range of 9–21 mg/kg for the same samples. Zambia Sugar believes that the samples suffered sedimentation in the transport to the government laboratory and that this explains the different results.
MOST, the USAID micronutrient program, sponsored the creation of training manuals for health inspectors and Food and Drug enforcement officers, as well as a national training workshop from September 24 to October 7, 2000. The workshop focused on inspection procedures and methods, provided laboratory training where appropriate, and included a trip to the Zambia Sugar plant. Since the implementation of that program, Zambia Sugar has expressed satisfaction with law enforcement efforts. UNICEF subsequently funded workshops at the district level, using reproductions of the training manuals that had been produced with MOST funding.
","nationwide","..","","","","Vulnerable groups","","","Financial resources","","Communication","","Financial resources","","Adherence","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "11637","Purchase for Progress (P4P) Pilot Initiative ","English","Multi-national","","AFG|BFA|COD|SLV|ETH|GHA|GTM|HND|KEN|LAO|LBR|MWI|MLI|MOZ|NIC|RWA|SLE|SSD|UGA|TZA|ZMB","Afghanistan|Burkina Faso|Democratic Republic of the Congo|El Salvador|Ethiopia|Ghana|Guatemala|Honduras|Kenya|Lao People's Democratic Republic|Liberia|Malawi|Mali|Mozambique|Nicaragua|Rwanda|Sierra Leone|South Sudan|Uganda|United Republic of Tanzania|Zambia","","Rural|Peri-urban","on-going","01-2008","01-2013","As the world’s largest humanitarian agency, WFP is a major staple food buyer. In 2012, WFP bought US$1.1 billion worth of food – more than 75 percent of this in developing countries WFP buys locally in developing countries when its criteria of price, quality and quantity can be met. P4P is a logical continuation of this local procurement with the intent to achieve a higher developmental gain with WFP’s procurement footprint by buying increasingly in a smallholder-friendly way.
Through P4P, WFP’s demand provides smallholder farmers in 20 pilot countries with a greater incentive to invest in their production, as they have the possibility to sell to a reliable buyer and receive a fair price for their crops. It is envisioned that in the wake of WFP purchasing in a more smallholder-friendly way, other buyers of staple commodities including Governments and the private sector will also increasingly be able to buy from smallholders.
P4P at the same time invests in capacity building at country level in areas such as post-harvest handling or storage, which will yield sustainable results in boosting national food security over the long term. The five year pilot P4P (2009 - 2013)[1] rests on three pillars:
WFP usually buys food through large competitive tenders. Through P4P, WFP is testing new procurement approaches more suited to smallholder farmers and:
Country approaches to P4P are tailored to suit the opportunities and constraints within each country. Generally, however, each programme has applied one or more of the general approaches:
Approach #1: Farmers’ organisations and capacity building partnerships:
Approach #2: Support to emerging structured trading systems
Approach #3: Small and medium traders
Approach #4: Developing local food processing capacity
.
","M&E system specifies data collection and analysis methods designed to track a number of indicators of programme performance.
The M&E system collects data from a number of sources including:
The M&E system also incorporates peer review to identify and validate best practices. At the country level, these include stakeholder meetings, workshops, and annual reviews. At the regional level, WFP is using writeshops and regional workshops to consolidate and validate learning. At the global/programme level, a Technical Review Panel meets annually to review and help interpret results and to guide implementation. Peer review meetings, annual reviews, internal (to WFP) stakeholder groups, and external evaluations also serve to validate results.
Managing the learning process for a programme with the scope and scale of P4P has been challenging and the design and evolution of the M&E system reflect these challenges. In particular:
Economic Research Consortium (AERC) to manage collection and analysis of the quantitative data.
Since P4P's launch in September 2008,
Stories From the Field: Ethiopi
Women farmers face many obstacles that they need to overcome to become successful business women. But the example of Mashuu, from Chefo Umbera, southern Ethiopia, shows that with the right support, female farmers can become independent market players.
When she left school, Mashuu noticed her peers marrying early, sometimes to men who took more than one wife. Mashuu saw her future differently, and together with two sisters and a sister-in-law, formed a women’s group, hoping to empower women through family planning education and HIV/AIDS awareness. They started with four members – today, there are 165.
“As the group started to grow, I realized we needed to become strong and independent economically,” said Mashuu. And that was how Jalela Primary Cooperative was born. Women bring their cereal harvests to Jalela, and the cooperative then sells it to Mira, their local cooperative union. The union sells the aggregated commodities to buyers such as WFP.
The 2011 drought-induced crop failure led to high market prices and a shortage of marketable produce in Ethiopia. This caused most cooperatives to default on their contracts with WFP. But Jalela still sold 30 metric tons of maize to WFP. The net profit of about US$170 was in part kept for the cooperative and in part distributed to the co-op members. Mashuu still has high hopes for the future despite the difficulties with the 2011 drought. She has plans to build a grain mill, start dairy production, and even bring electricity to the Jalela co-op. “We are going to change our lives,” she concludes.
The Experience in Guatemala
In Guatemala, P4P focuses on sales beyond WFP for two reasons: to promote long-term sustainability and to provide alternative outlets for farmers’ surplus production. Since WFP in Guatemala distributes only a few thousand metric tons (mt) of food every year, the quantities it can purchase from smallholder farmers’ organizations is relatively small, as illustrated in the table below.
P4P assisted Farmers’ Organizations (FOs) are located in northern and eastern regions of Guatemala as well as on the Pacific Coastal plain. A market study examined potential alternative buyers for both bulked and processed grain, including regional and national buyers such as the food industry, private traders, exporters, NGOs and the Government of Guatemala. According to information collected between 2008 through 2012, approximately a third of the P4P supported FOs have sold maize or beans to buyers beyond WFP. Of the total of 6,800 mt sold, 70% was maize (4,800 mt) and the rest beans (2,000 mt).
A maize processor in Guatemala that produces tortilla flour purchased 59% of the total tonnage. The second biggest buyer was Wal-Mart, which purchased 918 mt of beans. Sales to other national supermarkets, large traders and exporters represent 11% of the total (750 mt). Some 739 mt of maize and beans were sold on local markets (local grocery stores, municipal markets and traders). Small amounts were also purchased by NGOs, FAO and other P4P supported FOs.
With support from FAO, some FOs have developed the capacity to produce seed as well as grain. This represents 1.3% of the tonnage sold, but 4.2% of the income generated through collective sales beyond WFP. Such a successful focus on higherincome options has motivated the FOs to explore other markets such as retail packaging of beans, production of red beans specific to the El Salvador market, and fresh corn on the cob.
The P4P team works with the FOs to encourage sales beyond WFP. Commercialization committees are formed in the FOs and a roster of identified potential buyers in the market is shared with all. Training on effective negotiation t e c h n i q u e s a n d t h e development of business plans also begins this year.
Potential buyers are invited to the field to see the production of the grains, post-harvest management and quality control. This also allows them to become familiar with the maturity of the organization, increasing the confidence of buyers in the capacity of the FOs to establish commercial relations. This is complemented by demonstrating tools such as the “Blue Box”1, which is both a training tool and a field laboratory, which separates produce that does not meet specifications. Through partnering with P4P, FOs gained the trust of the commercial sector and confidence in their own abilities to reach a broad range of markets.
Farmers organizations’ experience steady progression in Mozambique
In Mozambique, farmers’ organizations (FOs) were created by both national government and nongovernmental organizations to facilitate technical assistance in agricultural production and marketing. This was especially important in the recovery period that followed the 1992 General Peace Agreement.
Most FOs gradually evolved from the village level to linking with other FOs at a district level. The district level is often represented by an ‘umbrella’ association of FOs, the tier with which P4P in Mozambique works directly. There are currently 10 such “umbrella” FOs in Mozambique participating in P4P. As of 2012, WFP has bought almost 10,000 metric tons (mt) of maize, beans and pulses from these FOs, valued at $5.8 million.
Apart from selling to WFP, P4P is helping FOs to identify sustainable and fair markets for sales beyond WFP. Prior to participating in the P4P initiative, many farmers had limited or no experience in selling collectively to markets. In 2009, sales beyond WFP were only 644 mt, tripling by 2012 to 1,800 mt. The table below summarizes crops sold by all 10 FOs under P4P in Mozambique and the income generated from sales per year.
P4P’s support to smallholder farmers in accessing markets for crops such as maize, beans and pulses has had a positive impact. When P4P began in 2009, soybean was the mostsold commodity by P4P supported FOs (2,480 mt). Maize was second at 926 mt, sesame third with 699 mt, followed by pigeon peas at 538 mt of sales. The possible profit margin for growing and selling maize is beginning to compete with the profits available in the soy and sesame trade, although commercial maize value remains low compared to other commodities. Buyers that are purchasing commodities from these FOs are:
The volume of products marketed in relation to the number of buyers demonstrates that the market in Mozambique is neither structured nor stable. There are often a high number of buyers intervening at the same time in more than one crop. Quality issues are often secondary for many buyers, as product availability is often considered more important.
While marketing platforms still have a long way to go in Mozambique, participating in P4P has helped with sales to markets beyond WFP. The relative consistency of having WFP as a buyer and the training provided by P4P and partners has helped many FOs meet the demands needed for selling to other buyers of quality.
Malawi – How a farmers’ organization is progressing
Kafulu Smallholder Farmers Organization (FO) was established in 2003. At the time of its establishment, Kafulu had two clear objectives: to achieve food security in the area and to find markets for their surplus. Currently the FO has 1,400 members (of which 500 are women) and with assistance from the National Agricultural Smallholder Farmers Association of Malawi (NASFAM), they have been able to build a warehouse. Kafulu had experience of selling maize collectively before P4P started in Malawi, however, since joining P4P they have been given the opportunity to learn the skills needed to achieve better deals with buyers.
A Challenging Beginning
Though Kafulu has progressed in their ability to connect to markets, the process has not been without difficulty. When the FO decided to participate in P4P it obtained credit in the 2008/2009 season, allowing them to expand their inputs loan scheme. In the 2009/2010 season, the organization again had access to credit, but faced severe problems in repayment. Loans were given to individuals and not directly to the FO and as a result, some individuals were unable to meet repayment obligations causing tensions among members. In addition, Kafulu signed a contract with WFP for the sale of 526 metric tons (mt) of maize, but was not able to deliver anything at all due to quality problems. The FO then had to sell the maize to other buyers who were not looking for high quality and they received a lower price.
In spite of these difficulties, Kafulu persevered. They managed to retain most of the membership despite the credit repayment issue, and tried to sell to WFP once again. In the 2010/2011 season, Kafulu delivered 100 mt of maize to WFP, this time with no quality issues.
Towards Graduation
By then, Kafulu farmers saw a clear way ahead: “We want to sell to people like WFP, because they are able to get a lot of money at one time and they offer fair prices for quality produce”,
stated one of the members of the Executive Committee. Although Kafulu farmers did not know then, they were completing the first step towards graduation - they had learnt how to condition their crop for higher quality standards and they had managed to aggregate at least twice. This placed them in a better position to compete with other FOs.
In the 2011/2012 season, Kafulu managed to aggregate 460 mt of maize, which they deposited into the warehouse receipt system (WRS) at the beginning of the season. From this deposit, they managed to get 70 percent of the receipt value as credit, which allowed them to wait until later in the season to sell when better prices were available.
Market Experience Today
In February 2013, Kafulu was awarded a contract for almost 230 mt of maize from WFP. They competed directly with medium and big traders in the Malawi market. By that time, they had already sold half of their maize to other buyers, at prevailing prices of around 90 MWK/kg (USD 0.27), making a good profit and enabling them to repay the credit and fees for the warehouse.
Kafulu FO still has problems with its membership stemming from past individual loan defaults and it is now dealing with the challenges of managing a WRS on its own. However, the FO has more knowledge of markets and is now prepared to engage competitively in them.
","English" "12448","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GTM","Guatemala","Guatemala","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","National NGOs","SHARE Guatemala, Mercy Corps","","","","","","","","Government","","Deworming was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOH","","","","","","","","Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>>Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/deworming","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12448","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GTM","Guatemala","Guatemala","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","National NGOs","SHARE Guatemala, Mercy Corps","","","","","","","","Government","","Take-home rations distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: SOSEP, MSPAS and Brigada Cubana","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to prevention or treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in children>>>Supplementary feeding in community settings for promoting child growth>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/child_growth|Food supplementation in children with moderate acute malnutrition>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/food_children_mam","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12448","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GTM","Guatemala","Guatemala","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","National NGOs","SHARE Guatemala, Mercy Corps","","","","","","","","Government","","Referral health system for children who require nutrition interventions was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: SHARE Guatemala, Programa PROCOMIDA","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12448","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GTM","Guatemala","Guatemala","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","National NGOs","SHARE Guatemala, Mercy Corps","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MAGA","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12448","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GTM","Guatemala","Guatemala","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","National NGOs","SHARE Guatemala, Mercy Corps","","","","","","","","Government","","Vitamin A supplements distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MINEDUC,MSPAS","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12474","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","NPL","Nepal","Nepal","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Deworming was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: District Health Officer/ District Education Officer","","","","","","","","Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>>Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/deworming","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12474","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","NPL","Nepal","Nepal","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Iron and folic acid supplements distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Nutrition Section, DoHS, MoHP / DoE, MoE","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12474","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","NPL","Nepal","Nepal","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Referral health system for children who require nutrition interventions was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Nutrition Section, DoHS, MoHP / DoE, MoE","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12474","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","NPL","Nepal","Nepal","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","School meals based on national dietary guidelines was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: DoE","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12476","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","PER","Peru","Peru","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Deworming was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Direcciones Regionales de Salud de las Personas","","","","","","","","Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>>Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/deworming","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12480","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SWE","Sweden","Sweden","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Local and regional municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","12479","","Deworming","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","Deworming was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>>Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/deworming","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12480","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SWE","Sweden","Sweden","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Local and regional municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","12983","Overweight and diet-related NCDs","Implementation of legislation on marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12480","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SWE","Sweden","Sweden","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Local and regional municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","13063","Overweight and diet-related NCDs","Implementation of legislation on marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","Vending machines not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12480","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SWE","Sweden","Sweden","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Local and regional municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","14217","","School feeding programmes","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12482","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","TGO","Togo","Togo","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health","Service des jeunes et adolescent","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Deworming was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>>Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/deworming","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12484","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","THA","Thailand","Thailand","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Deworming was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>>Deworming to combat the health and nutritional impact of soil-transmitted helminths>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/deworming","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12484","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","THA","Thailand","Thailand","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Monitoring and informing parents on children's growth was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12484","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","THA","Thailand","Thailand","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12484","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","THA","Thailand","Thailand","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Hygienic cooking facilities and clean eating environment was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Department of Health","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12484","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","THA","Thailand","Thailand","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Iron and folic acid supplements distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12527","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","GHA","Ghana","Ghana","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOH","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12535","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","LBN","Lebanon","Lebanon","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health|Health","Ministry of health","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12629","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","URY","Uruguay","Uruguay","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Policy tools exist. www.msp.gub.uy
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12643","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHL","Chile","Chile","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Nutrient reference values was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12643","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHL","Chile","Chile","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Promotion of healthy nutrition through media (e.g.TV, radio, newspapers, posters, websites) was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Policy tools exist. www.minsal.cl /protección de la Salud / alimentos y Nutrición
","","M&E implemented by: MINSAL Corporación 5 al día","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12643","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHL","Chile","Chile","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Nutrition counselling in primary health care was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. www.minsal.cl /protección de la Salud / alimentos y Nutrición
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12652","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","MRT","Mauritania","Mauritania","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health|Health","ministere de la santé","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Nutrient reference values was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12853","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GHA","Ghana","Ghana","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Take-home rations distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: GES","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to prevention or treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in children>>>Supplementary feeding in community settings for promoting child growth>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/child_growth|Food supplementation in children with moderate acute malnutrition>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/food_children_mam","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12853","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GHA","Ghana","Ghana","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Referral health system for children who require nutrition interventions was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12858","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LAO","Lao People's Democratic Republic","Lao People's Democratic Republic","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Take-home rations distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOE","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to prevention or treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in children>>>Supplementary feeding in community settings for promoting child growth>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/child_growth|Food supplementation in children with moderate acute malnutrition>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/food_children_mam","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12858","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LAO","Lao People's Democratic Republic","Lao People's Democratic Republic","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Monitoring and informing parents on children's growth was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOH","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12858","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LAO","Lao People's Democratic Republic","Lao People's Democratic Republic","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Hygienic cooking facilities and clean eating environment was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOE,MOH","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12858","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LAO","Lao People's Democratic Republic","Lao People's Democratic Republic","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Iron and folic acid supplements distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOH","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12858","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LAO","Lao People's Democratic Republic","Lao People's Democratic Republic","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Referral health system for children who require nutrition interventions was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOH","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12858","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LAO","Lao People's Democratic Republic","Lao People's Democratic Republic","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOE,MOH","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12858","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LAO","Lao People's Democratic Republic","Lao People's Democratic Republic","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOE","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12858","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LAO","Lao People's Democratic Republic","Lao People's Democratic Republic","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","School meals based on national dietary guidelines was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOE,MOH","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12860","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LCA","Saint Lucia","Saint Lucia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Take-home rations distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to prevention or treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in children>>>Supplementary feeding in community settings for promoting child growth>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/child_growth|Food supplementation in children with moderate acute malnutrition>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/food_children_mam","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12866","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","BIH","Bosnia and Herzegovina","Bosnia and Herzegovina","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Education and research","Cantonal ministries of Education","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Monitoring and informing parents on children's growth was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12880","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ECU","Ecuador","Ecuador","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Monitoring and informing parents on children's growth was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministerio de Educación","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12880","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ECU","Ecuador","Ecuador","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministerio de Educación","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12887","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","HND","Honduras","Honduras","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Monitoring and informing parents on children's growth was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Programa de Escuelas Saludables","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12887","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","HND","Honduras","Honduras","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Programa de Escuelas Saludables","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12887","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","HND","Honduras","Honduras","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Vitamin A supplements distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12900","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Monitoring and informing parents on children's growth was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of EducationMinistry of Health","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12900","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Iron and folic acid supplements distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Health (Family Health Bureau)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12900","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Referral health system for children who require nutrition interventions was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of EducationMinistry of Health","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12900","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of EducationMinistry of Health","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12900","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of EducationMinistry of Health","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12900","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of EducationMinistry of Health","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12900","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","School meals based on national dietary guidelines was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of EducationMinistry of Health","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12900","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Vitamin A supplements distributed was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Health (Family Health Bureau)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12943","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","BRA","Brazil","Brazil","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12951","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","FIN","Finland","Finland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Sub-national","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","12950","Overweight and diet-related NCDs","Implementation of legislation on marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children","","","","School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","school","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12951","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","FIN","Finland","Finland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Sub-national","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","13047","Overweight and diet-related NCDs","Implementation of legislation on marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children","","","","School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","school","Vending machines not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12959","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","IND","India","India","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12963","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ISL","Iceland","Iceland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","UN","Other","Parents, schools","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","12962","Overweight and diet-related NCDs","Implementation of legislation on marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, ","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12963","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ISL","Iceland","Iceland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","UN","Other","Parents, schools","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","13052","Overweight and diet-related NCDs","Implementation of legislation on marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, ","Vending machines not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12963","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ISL","Iceland","Iceland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","UN","Other","Parents, schools","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","13091","","Improved food safety at vending places","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","Hygienic cooking facilities and clean eating environment was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Municipal Environmental and Public Health Offices","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12963","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ISL","Iceland","Iceland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","UN","Other","Parents, schools","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","14034","","Provision of safe water","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Municipal Environmental and Public Health Offices","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12963","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ISL","Iceland","Iceland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","UN","Other","Parents, schools","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","14207","","School feeding programmes","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, ","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12963","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ISL","Iceland","Iceland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","UN","Other","Parents, schools","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","14242","","School fruit and vegetable scheme","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12963","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ISL","Iceland","Iceland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","UN","Other","Parents, schools","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","14289","","School milk scheme","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, ","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12963","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ISL","Iceland","Iceland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","UN","Other","Parents, schools","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","14339","","School feeding programmes","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","School meals based on national dietary guidelines was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12981","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","POL","Poland","Poland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","School directors","","Government","","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12981","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","POL","Poland","Poland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","School directors","","Government","","Vending machines not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12981","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","POL","Poland","Poland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","School directors","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12981","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","POL","Poland","Poland","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","School directors","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12989","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","USA","United States of America","United States of America","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Food and agriculture","USDA","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Various local school districts","","Government","","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12991","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","ZWE","Zimbabwe","Zimbabwe","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12993","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","EST","Estonia","Estonia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","12992","Overweight and diet-related NCDs","Implementation of legislation on marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children","","","","Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","pre-school, primary school, secondary school","Marketing of high-fat, energy dense, and/or micronutrient-poor foods and beverages not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Estonian advertising law says generally that advertising is prohibited in pre-schools, primary schools, basic school, and upper secondary schools.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12993","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","EST","Estonia","Estonia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Municipalities","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","13064","Overweight and diet-related NCDs","Implementation of legislation on marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children","","","","School age children (SAC)","","","Kindergarten/school","primary school, secondary school","Vending machines not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Vending machines are not common in Estonia, but there are buffets where children can buy snacks.Regulation adopted 2008 “Health protection requirements for catering at pre-school child care institutions and educational institutions” says that it is suggested (should be) to use healthy nutrition in shool buffets or vending machines.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12998","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","BOL","Bolivia (Plurinational State of)","Bolivia (Plurinational State of)","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Regulations on marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Alimentos y bebidas no alcoholicas (solo existe como norma). Voluntary measures. www.ibnorca.org
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "12998","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","BOL","Bolivia (Plurinational State of)","Bolivia (Plurinational State of)","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Labelling of foods with nutritional information was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Policy tools exist. Voluntary measures. www.ibnorca.org
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13019","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Regulations on marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Statutory measures.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13019","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","LKA","Sri Lanka","Sri Lanka","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Labelling of foods with nutritional information was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13022","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","PNG","Papua New Guinea","Papua New Guinea","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health","Food Sanitation Council & Gov","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Regulations on marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Statutory measures.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13025","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","DNK","Denmark","Denmark","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Other","Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Regulations on marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. The spring package 2.0.– spring 2009 – including increased fiscal taxes on chocolate and foods and drinks high on sugar. http://www.fm.dk/Publikationer/2009/~/media/Files/Publikationer/2009/aft... The relevant bill is read in the parliament spring 2009: http://www.fm.dk/Publikationer/2009/~/media/Files/Publikationer/2009/aft...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13025","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","DNK","Denmark","Denmark","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Other","Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Nutrition counselling in primary health care was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2006/CFF/Spaedbarnsernaering/Anbefalinger_3ud... www.sst.dk/upload/forebyggelse/cff/forebyggende_sundhedsordninger/sunde_...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13025","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","DNK","Denmark","Denmark","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Other","Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures/initiatives to remove/reduce the salt content of processed foods was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Dialogue with industry as part of the work going on in the EU high level group working on reducing the European salt intake.
","","","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to sodium reduction>>>Reducing sodium intake to control blood pressure in children>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_bp_children|Reducing sodium intake to reduce blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_cvd_adults","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13025","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","DNK","Denmark","Denmark","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Other","Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures to affect food prices (e.g.high fat, salt, sugary products) was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Fiscal taxes on soft drinks and confectionary is raised with the Spring package 2.0.- spring 2009.Fiscal taxes on confectionary are raised by 25%. And Fiscal taxes on soft drinks are seperated - fiscal taxes on soft drinks with sugar are raised and fiscal taxes on diet products are reduced. http://www.fo.stm.dk/publikationer/foraarspakke/forarspakke_2_0.pdf
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13033","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","TUV","Tuvalu","Tuvalu","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Regulations on marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13035","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","MYS","Malaysia","Malaysia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Private sector","Food Industries, Agro-based Industry","","","","Government","","Regulations on marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures. www.fsq.moh.gov.my
","","M&E implemented by: Private sectors`","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13035","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","MYS","Malaysia","Malaysia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Private sector","Food Industries, Agro-based Industry","","","","Government","","Measures to affect food prices (e.g.high fat, salt, sugary products) was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Measures through subsidies.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Domestic Trade, Coorperative & Consumerism ","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13046","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","DNK","Denmark","Denmark","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Municipalities","UN","Other","Vending machines not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13046","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","DNK","Denmark","Denmark","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","Municipalities","UN","Other","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. The ministry meets 50 percent of the expenses for the fruit; the rest is covered by the municipalities, parents or alternative funding.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13058","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MEX","Mexico","Mexico","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Vending machines not allowed on school premises was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13102","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MDV","Maldives","Maldives","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Hygienic cooking facilities and clean eating environment was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13108","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MRT","Mauritania","Mauritania","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","communities","","Government","","Hygienic cooking facilities and clean eating environment was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Education,WFP","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13108","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MRT","Mauritania","Mauritania","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","communities","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Education Directorate Of education and Hygiene and Sanitory Education (DNES); Regional Directorate s of Education (DREN); Departemental Inspections of Education (IDEN); Inspection of Circonscription (IC)","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13108","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MRT","Mauritania","Mauritania","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","communities","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Education,WFP","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13108","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MRT","Mauritania","Mauritania","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","communities","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Education,WFP","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13108","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MRT","Mauritania","Mauritania","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","communities","","Government","","School meals based on national dietary guidelines was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry Of Education WFP","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13117","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SLV","El Salvador","El Salvador","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Hygienic cooking facilities and clean eating environment was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Comunidad educativa local.","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13117","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SLV","El Salvador","El Salvador","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MSPAS","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13436","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","ZMB","Zambia","Zambia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health|Health","MoH","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Labelling of foods with nutritional information was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Statutory measures.
","","M&E implemented by: MoH","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13444","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHN","China","China","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Labelling of foods with nutritional information was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Health","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13444","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHN","China","China","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Promotion of healthy nutrition through media (e.g.TV, radio, newspapers, posters, websites) was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Policy tools exist.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13444","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHN","China","China","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Nutrition counselling in primary health care was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. In some communities
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13444","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHN","China","China","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures to promote fruit and vegetable intakes was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. By public education
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13444","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHN","China","China","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures/initiatives to remove/reduce the salt content of processed foods was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. public health education.
","","","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to sodium reduction>>>Reducing sodium intake to control blood pressure in children>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_bp_children|Reducing sodium intake to reduce blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_cvd_adults","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13444","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","CHN","China","China","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures/initiatives to remove/reduce the salt content of processed foods was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures.
","","","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to sodium reduction>>>Reducing sodium intake to control blood pressure in children>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_bp_children|Reducing sodium intake to reduce blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_cvd_adults","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13447","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","MDV","Maldives","Maldives","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Labelling of foods with nutritional information was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13454","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","SYC","Seychelles","Seychelles","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Labelling of foods with nutritional information was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13454","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","SYC","Seychelles","Seychelles","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures to promote fruit and vegetable intakes was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Measures through subsidies.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "13930","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","BEL","Belgium","Belgium","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health|Health","Federal Public Service of health; Superior Health Council","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","RIZIV/INAMI","","Government","","Measures to promote fruit and vegetable intakes was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Since several years, in Flanders a precursor of the EU project is already running (Tutti Frutti project)
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14013","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","BGD","Bangladesh","Bangladesh","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health|Health","Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; Government of Bangladesh","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","National NGOs","","","","","","","","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: GoB and Respective NGOs","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14026","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GNB","Guinea-Bissau","Guinea-Bissau","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","National NGOs","AMIC","","","","","","","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: IPAD/AMIC","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14028","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GRD","Grenada","Grenada","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Schools, HEc curriculum; HFLE","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14028","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","GRD","Grenada","Grenada","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Schools, HEc curriculum; HFLE","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14037","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","KHM","Cambodia","Cambodia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","National NGOs","","","","","","","","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MoE","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14037","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","KHM","Cambodia","Cambodia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","National NGOs","","","","","","","","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: WFP","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14040","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","KOR","Republic of Korea","Republic of Korea","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14040","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","KOR","Republic of Korea","Republic of Korea","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14040","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","KOR","Republic of Korea","Republic of Korea","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Seoul City government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14066","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SYC","Seychelles","Seychelles","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Safe drinking-water was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOH / MOE","","","","","","","","Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>>Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to prevent diarrhoea>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/wsh_diarrhoea","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14066","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SYC","Seychelles","Seychelles","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14066","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","SYC","Seychelles","Seychelles","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","School meals based on national dietary guidelines was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14089","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","AIA","Anguilla","Anguilla","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures/initiatives to remove/reduce trans fatty acids (TFA) from processed foods was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14183","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","PER","Peru","Peru","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures/initiatives to remove/reduce the salt content of processed foods was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Sólo para regímenes especiales (CODEX)
","","","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to sodium reduction>>>Reducing sodium intake to control blood pressure in children>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_bp_children|Reducing sodium intake to reduce blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_cvd_adults","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14192","GNPR 2009-2010: Obesity and diet-related NCDs","English","Community/sub-national","","MNG","Mongolia","Mongolia","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 6 on Obesity and diet-related NCDs. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Measures/initiatives to remove/reduce the salt content of processed foods was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Voluntary measures.
","","M&E implemented by: Nutirtion research center ","","","","","","","","eLENA titles related to sodium reduction>>>Reducing sodium intake to control blood pressure in children>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_bp_children|Reducing sodium intake to reduce blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults>>http://www.who.int/elena/titles/sodium_cvd_adults","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14199","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","BHR","Bahrain","Bahrain","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","MCH Services/ Primary Care & Schools","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Schools","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14201","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","BRB","Barbados","Barbados","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Education and research","School Meals Department","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14203","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","BRN","Brunei Darussalam","Brunei Darussalam","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14214","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","OMN","Oman","Oman","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Schools and Regional Muncipalities, Schools' adminstrators, School health teams","","Government","","Private sector","Private sector","Private sector","community","UN","Other","Breakfast club was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: school health section ( health) and health education section ( education","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14227","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","BOL","Bolivia (Plurinational State of)","Bolivia (Plurinational State of)","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14227","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","BOL","Bolivia (Plurinational State of)","Bolivia (Plurinational State of)","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14251","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MMR","Myanmar","Myanmar","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Parent teacher's Association","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Local NGOs","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14267","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","UGA","Uganda","Uganda","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14267","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","UGA","Uganda","Uganda","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14272","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","NLD","Netherlands","Netherlands","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health|Health","Council Health Services","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","School","","Government","","Provision of fruit and vegetables was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010. Budget is only for educational materials, not for fruit itself
","","M&E implemented by: School","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14272","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","NLD","Netherlands","Netherlands","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","Health|Health","Council Health Services","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","School","","Government","","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14295","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","MDG","Madagascar","Madagascar","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Other","ONN","UN","","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14311","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","TLS","Timor-Leste","Timor-Leste","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","World Food Programme (WFP)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","Provision of milk was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: Ministry of Education and World Food Program","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "14364","GNPR 2009-2010: School-based nutrition","English","Community/sub-national","","TUV","Tuvalu","Tuvalu","","","","","These programmes and actions were reported by countries for the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review 2009-2010, Module 4 on School-based nutrition programmes. Please note that for simplicity, all interventions in a thematic module have been combined under the same programme for GINA, while they may not be implemented as a package and may have different partners. These data are currently being updated and completed through the GINA verification process. If you think you can help update and complete any of these data, please sign up to GINA and edit.
","WHO (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review. What does it take to scale up nutrition action?
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/policies/global_nut_policyrevi...
The Global nutrition policy review is based on a questionnaire survey conducted during 2009–2010, in which 119 WHO Member States and 4 territories participated.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","","School meals based on national dietary guidelines was reported during the WHO Global Nutrition Policy Review (GNPR) 2009-2010.
","","M&E implemented by: MOH with Education","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","" "23147","Third Community Health and Nutrition Project (CHN 3)","English","Large scale programmes","","IDN","Indonesia","","Urban|Rural|Peri-urban","completed","","2001","CHN 3 focused on capacity building, health information systems, education and service delivery in a province-based model in five provinces.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. Additionally, there is a section describing findings from cash transfer programmes. This summary of CHN 3 is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CHN 3 is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 3.6 million investment by the World Bank. US$ 0.6 million by the Government of Indonesia.","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Government of Indonesia","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23144","","Food distribution/supplementation for prevention of acute malnutrition","","","","Infants and young children|Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)","","Five provinces in Indonesia","Community-based","","Internal provision supplementary feeding
","Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","From 1989 to 2003 underweight (<-2 SD WAZ) decreased from 37.5% to 27.5% (0.71 ppt/year) despite the financial crisis of the early 1990s. This decrease may be partially attributed to a reduction in birth-rate in the lowest quintile of the population.
","Five provinces in Indonesia","Five provinces in Indonesia","","","","None","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Attempts to decentralize health interventions to the provincial level with CHN3 faced challenges of implementation and monitoring. Lack of baseline and surveillance data made effectiveness of these projects difficult to define.
","","English" "23147","Third Community Health and Nutrition Project (CHN 3)","English","Large scale programmes","","IDN","Indonesia","","Urban|Rural|Peri-urban","completed","","2001","CHN 3 focused on capacity building, health information systems, education and service delivery in a province-based model in five provinces.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. Additionally, there is a section describing findings from cash transfer programmes. This summary of CHN 3 is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CHN 3 is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 3.6 million investment by the World Bank. US$ 0.6 million by the Government of Indonesia.","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Government of Indonesia","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23145","","Growth monitoring and promotion","","","","Infants and young children|Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)","","Five provinces in Indonesia","Community-based","","","Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","From 1989 to 2003 underweight (<-2 SD WAZ) decreased from 37.5% to 27.5% (0.71 ppt/year) despite the financial crisis of the early 1990s. This decrease may be partially attributed to a reduction in birth-rate in the lowest quintile of the population
","Five provinces in Indonesia","Five provinces in Indonesia","","","","None","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Attempts to decentralize health interventions to the provincial level with CHN3 faced challenges of implementation and monitoring. Lack of baseline and surveillance data made effectiveness of these projects difficult to define.
","","English" "23147","Third Community Health and Nutrition Project (CHN 3)","English","Large scale programmes","","IDN","Indonesia","","Urban|Rural|Peri-urban","completed","","2001","CHN 3 focused on capacity building, health information systems, education and service delivery in a province-based model in five provinces.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. Additionally, there is a section describing findings from cash transfer programmes. This summary of CHN 3 is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CHN 3 is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 3.6 million investment by the World Bank. US$ 0.6 million by the Government of Indonesia.","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Government of Indonesia","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23146","","Nutrition education and counselling","","","","Lactating women (LW)|Pregnant women (PW)","","Five provinces in Indonesia","Community-based","","","Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","From 1989 to 2003 underweight (<-2 SD WAZ) decreased from 37.5% to 27.5% (0.71 ppt/year) despite the financial crisis of the early 1990s. This decrease may be partially attributed to a reduction in birth-rate in the lowest quintile of the population.
","Five provinces in Indonesia","Five provinces in Indonesia","","","","None","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Attempts to decentralize health interventions to the provincial level with CHN3 faced challenges of implementation and monitoring. Lack of baseline and surveillance data made effectiveness of these projects difficult to define.
","","English" "23176","ACF-France programme communautaire: Prise en Charge de la Malnutrition Aiguë dans le district de Manni","English","Community/sub-national","","BFA","Burkina Faso","Manni, Burkina Faso","Rural","completed","05-2012","05-2014","Action Contre la Faim - France (ACF-F) intervient dans la région de l´Est du Burkina Faso depuis 2008 et dans la province de la Gnagna (le district sanitaire (DS) de Bogandé et Manni) depuis 2009. Le projet d’appui à la Prise en charge de la malnutrition aigüe (PCIMA) a commencé en mai 2012 puis reconduit en juillet 2013 et prendra fin en mai 2014 et a pour objectif de contribuer à la réduction de la morbidité et de la mortalité liées à la malnutrition aigüe. L’appui donné au district de Manni est fait depuis la Base d’ACF située dans le district de Bogandé.
","Ce programme a été identifié par le biais du projet «Coverage Monitoring Network» (CMN). Le projet CMN est une initiative inter-agence qui vise à accroître et d'améliorer le suivi de la couverture de la gestion communautaire de la malnutrition aiguë (CMAM) programmes à l'échelle mondiale, et renforce les capacités des professionnels nationaux et internationaux de la nutrition. Sa vocation est de fournir un support technique et des outils aux programmes de PCMA afin de les aider à évaluer leur impact, de partager et capitaliser les leçons apprises sur les facteurs influençant leur performance. Le projet met l'accent sur le renforcement des compétences en méthodologie SQUEAC et SLEAC. Il est mis en œuvre par un consortium dirigé par ACF International, et comprend Save the Children, Concern Worldwide, International Medical Corps, Helen Keller International et Valid International. Le projet est financé par la Commission européenne, Direction générale de l'aide humanitaire et de la protection civile (ECHO) et le Bureau du Foreign Disaster Assistance des États-Unis (OFDA) de l'USAID. Pour en savoir plus, s'il vous plaît visitez le site Web de la CMN à
http://www.coverage-monitoring.org/
Veuillez suivre le lien ci-dessous pour accéder au rapport complet du CMN sur la couverture du projet PCMA dans le district de Manni (2013 and 2014):
","8806","","","","","","Action Against Hunger (AAH) / Action contre la faim (ACF)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Development","OFDA ( U.S. Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23175","","Management of severe acute malnutrition","","","","SAM child","Enfants de 6 à 59 mois","District de Manni","Community-based|Primary health care center","","Les activités de prise en charge de la Malnutrition Aigüe (PCIMA) sont assurées dans tous les centres de santés du district sanitaire de Manni. Cela concerne aussi bien la prise en charge en ambulatoire (PCA) pour la MAS/MAM et la prise en charge en interne (PCI) pour les cas de MAS avec complications.
Les activités d’appui consistent essentiellement à la formation et au recyclage des agents de santé, les visites d’appuis techniques à travers des supervisions régulières pour la PCA et la PCI, appui en équipements médico-techniques et en intrants pour la prise en charge. Au niveau de la PCI ACF-F fait la subvention des repas des accompagnant(e)s depuis septembre 2012 ainsi que les soins médicaux (médicaments, consommables et examens biologiques) et évacuations des malades des CSPS vers les CREN.
","La SQUEAC c´est une évaluation semi-quantitative parce que combinant des données quantitatives et qualitatives:
Données quantitatives: données de routine (admissions, abandons, indicateurs de performance) et données collectées (cas couverts et cas non couverts) au cours d’enquêtes sur petites et grandes zones.
Données qualitatives: informations (opinions, connaissances sur la malnutrition, connaissances du programme de PEC, perception de la malnutrition, recours aux soins, facteurs limitant la PEC…) collectées auprès la communauté, des acteurs et bénéficiaires impliqués dans le service.
","ACF effectue des évaluations périodiques de la couverture du programme PCIMA, la dernière évaluation a été réalisée en mai 2013. Pour voir l’évolution de la couverture et la mise en route des recommandations de l’évaluation passée, une seconde évaluation a été réalisée en février 2014, huit mois après la précédente évaluation qui avait montré un taux de couverture actuelle de de 26,1% [IC 95% : 17,1- 37,7%]. L´outil SQUEAC permet d´assurer à moindre coût un monitoring régulier des programmes et d´identifier les zones de couverture faible ou élevée ainsi que les raisons expliquant ces situations. L’ensemble de ces informations permet de planifier des actions spécifiques et concrètes dans le but d’améliorer la couverture des programmes concernés.
La méthodologie SQUEAC se compose de trois étapes principales:
Etape 1: Identification des zones de couverture élevée ou faible et des barrières à l’accessibilité
Etape 2: Vérification des hypothèses sur les zones de couverture faible ou élevée au moyen d’enquêtes sur petites zones
Etape 3: Estimation de la couverture globale
","La population du district sanitaire de Manni est estimee a 168 963 habitants en 2014 (RGPH 2006) dont les enfants de 6 a 59 mois representent 18,55% (31 343).","52,4% [IC 95% : 43,1 - 61,8%]","Point","Les prévalences selon l’indice Poids/Taille de la malnutrition dans la province de la Gnagna étaient estimées en septembre 2013 à 7,5% [5,8-9,6%] pour la Malnutrition Aigüe Globale (MAG) et à 1,2% [0,6-2,6%] pour la Malnutrition Aigüe Sévère (MAS).","","None","","","Others, please specify below","","Management","","Communication","","Infrastructure","","Others, please specify below","","","","","","","","","","","","","Les résultats indiquent une forte évolution de la couverture car elle est le double de celle retrouvée à la dernière évaluation. Cette situation est à mettre en lien avec une forte amélioration des activités de dépistages passifs au niveau des centres de santé ainsi que l’implication des animateurs communautaires pour la sensibilisation et la recherche des absents (personnels du GRET ONG partenaire qui se charge du volet communautaire). La disponibilité et l’implication des personnels surtout au niveau des CSPS pourraient être un point fort du district sanitaire ce qui contribue beaucoup à l’amélioration de sa couverture. L’absence des hameaux de culture, présents dans les autres districts sanitaires, notamment Bogandé, permet d’éviter les déplacements des populations pendant les périodes des récoltes, et serait grandement responsable pour cette forte couverture.
","","English" "23187","ACF-France programme communautaire: Prise en Charge de la Malnutrition Aiguë dans le district de Bogande","English","Community/sub-national","","BFA","Burkina Faso","Bogande, Burkina Faso","Rural","completed","05-2012","05-2014","Action Contre la Faim – France (ACF-F) intervient dans la région de l´Est du Burkina Faso depuis 2008 et dans la province de la Gnagna depuis 2009. Le projet d’appui à la Prise en charge de la malnutrition aigüe (PCIMA) a commencé en mai 2012 puis reconduit en juillet 2013 et prendra fin en mai 2014. L´appui donné au district de Bogandé est fait depuis la Base d’ACF située à Bogandé. Le projet actuel, financé par OFDA a pour objectif de contribuer à la réduction de morbidité et mortalité associées à la malnutrition aigüe au Burkina Faso.
","Ce programme a été identifié par le biais du projet «Coverage Monitoring Network» (CMN). Le projet CMN est une initiative inter-agence qui vise à accroître et d'améliorer le suivi de la couverture de la gestion communautaire de la malnutrition aiguë (CMAM) programmes à l'échelle mondiale, et renforce les capacités des professionnels nationaux et internationaux de la nutrition. Sa vocation est de fournir un support technique et des outils aux programmes de PCMA afin de les aider à évaluer leur impact, de partager et capitaliser les leçons apprises sur les facteurs influençant leur performance. Le projet met l'accent sur le renforcement des compétences en méthodologie SQUEAC et SLEAC. Il est mis en œuvre par un consortium dirigé par ACF International, et comprend Save the Children, Concern Worldwide, International Medical Corps, Helen Keller International et Valid International. Le projet est financé par la Commission européenne, Direction générale de l'aide humanitaire et de la protection civile (ECHO) et le Bureau du Foreign Disaster Assistance des États-Unis (OFDA) de l'USAID. Pour en savoir plus, s'il vous plaît visitez le site Web de la CMN à
http://www.coverage-monitoring.org/
Veuillez suivre le lien ci-dessous pour accéder au rapport complet du CMN sur la couverture du projet PCMA dans le district de Bogande (2013 and 2014):
","","","","","","","Action Against Hunger (AAH) / Action contre la faim (ACF)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Development","Bureau du Foreign Disaster Assistance des États-Unis (OFDA) ","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23186","","Management of severe acute malnutrition","","","","SAM child","Enfants de 6 à 59 mois","District de Bogande","Primary health care center","","Les activités de prise en charge de la Malnutrition Aigüe (PCIMA) sont assurées dans les centres de santés publiques et confessionnelles du district sanitaire de Bogandé. Cela concerne aussi bien la prise en charge en ambulatoire (PCA) pour la MAS/MAM et la prise en charge en interne (PCI) pour les cas de MAS avec complications.
Les activités d’appui d’ACF consistent essentiellement à la formation et au recyclage des agents de santé, les visites d’appuis techniques à travers des supervisions régulières pour la PCA et la PCI, appui en équipements médico-techniques et en intrants pour la prise en charge. Au niveau de la PCI ACF-F fait la subvention des repas des accompagnantes depuis septembre 2012 ainsi que les soins médicaux (médicaments, consommables et examens biologiques) et évacuations des malades vers les CREN.
","La SQUEAC c´est une évaluation semi‐quantitative parce que combinant des données quantitatives et qualitatives:
Données quantitatives: données de routine (admissions, abandons, indicateurs de performance) et données collectées (cas couverts et cas non couverts) au cours d’enquêtes sur petites et grandes zones.
Données qualitatives: informations (opinions, connaissances sur la malnutrition, connaissances du programme de PEC, perception de la malnutrition, recours aux soins, facteurs limitant la PEC…) collectées auprès la communauté, des acteurs et bénéficiaires impliqués dans le service.
","ACF effectue des évaluations périodiques de la couverture du programme PCIMA, la dernière évaluation a été réalisée en mai 2013, dans la province de la Gnagna (District sanitaire Bogandé). Pour voir l’évolution de la couverture et la mise en route des recommandations de l’évaluation passée, une seconde évaluation a été réalisée en février 2014 (03 au 23 février 2014), huit mois après la précédente évaluation qui avait montré un taux de couverture actuelle de 30,2% [IC 95% : 20,8- 41,6%].
L' investigation de la couverture du programme de prise en charge de la MAS dans le district a été conduite en utilisant la méthodologie « Semi Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage » (SQUEAC). L´outil SQUEAC permet d´assurer à moindre coût un monitoring régulier des programmes et d´identifier les zones de couverture faible ou élevée ainsi que les raisons expliquant ces situations. L’ensemble de ces informations permet de planifier des actions spécifiques et concrètes dans le but d’améliorer la couverture des programmes concernés.
La méthodologie SQUEAC se compose de trois étapes principales:
L’étape 1 consiste à identifier les zones de couverture élevée ou faible et des barrières à l’accessibilité
L’étape 2 permet de vérifier des hypothèses sur les zones de couverture faible ou élevée au moyen d’enquêtes sur petites zones
L’étape 3 permet d’estimer la couverture globale à travers la construction d’un « a priori » (basé sur les barrières et les boosters), de l’Évidence Vraisemblable et d’un « post priori » basé sur la recherche de cas.
","Les enfants de 6 à 59 mois représentent 17,85% (61736) du population du district sanitaire de Bogande","38,8% [IC 95% : 29,8 - 48,6%]","Point","","","None","","","Others, please specify below","","Management","","Others, please specify below","","Infrastructure","","Others, please specify below","","","","","","","","","","","","","Cette couverture faible est à mettre en lien avec les préoccupations des mères (charge de travail) ainsi qu’une méconnaissance de l’importance des soins nutritionnels (malnutrition perçue souvent comme maladie traditionnelle) entrainant un recours de première intention au traitement traditionnel, limitant ainsi l’accès aux soins en dépit de sa gratuité pour les enfants malnutris. L’investigation a par ailleurs mis en évidence une faiblesse du système de dépistage actif et de suivi des absents au traitement, ce qui pose la question de la pérennisation de ces activités en l’absence de soutien technique continu.
En plus de ces barrières à l’accessibilité communes dans l’ensemble du District Sanitaire de Bogandé, la distance est ressortie comme un frein supplémentaire à l’accessibilité dans les zones concernées.
Nonobstant ces barrières et la faible évolution de la couverture il faut rappeler que des efforts considérables sont mis en oeuvre sur le terrain par les différents acteurs dans le cadre des activités de PCIMA, tant au niveau communautaire que sur le plan de la prise en charge dans les structures de santé. Dans le contexte actuel et pour espérer un désengagement total d’ACF dans le District Sanitaire de Bogandé quant aux activités de prise en charge de la malnutrition, il apparaît aujourd’hui impératif d’entreprendre des mesures correctrices afin de consolider les acquis et continuer d’améliorer la couverture et l’accessibilité au traitement pour les malnutris.
","","English" "23194","ACF programme communautaire: Prise en Charge de la Malnutrition Aiguë dans le district de Fada N’Gourma","English","Community/sub-national","","BFA","Burkina Faso","Fada N’Gourma, Burkina Faso","Rural","on-going","08-2012","","ACF à travers le programme nutrition santé appuie le DS de Fada à la prise en charge de la malnutrition aigüe depuis août 2012 suite à la crise alimentaire de 2012 au sahel. Ces appuis se font par le renforcement des capacities à travers les formations, les dotations de matériels médico techniques, la subvention des évacuations et des soins médicaux, et des visites d’appuis techniques lors des séances de prise en charge. Au niveau communautaire, ACF travaille en partenariat avec le GRET qui mène des activités de sensibilisations, de dépistage, de Visite à Domicile (VAD) à travers des animateurs.
","Ce programme a été identifié par le biais du projet «Coverage Monitoring Network» (CMN). Le projet CMN est une initiative inter-agence qui vise à accroître et d'améliorer le suivi de la couverture de la gestion communautaire de la malnutrition aiguë (CMAM) programmes à l'échelle mondiale, et renforce les capacités des professionnels nationaux et internationaux de la nutrition. Sa vocation est de fournir un support technique et des outils aux programmes de PCMA afin de les aider à évaluer leur impact, de partager et capitaliser les leçons apprises sur les facteurs influençant leur performance. Le projet met l'accent sur le renforcement des compétences en méthodologie SQUEAC et SLEAC. Il est mis en œuvre par un consortium dirigé par ACF International, et comprend Save the Children, Concern Worldwide, International Medical Corps, Helen Keller International et Valid International. Le projet est financé par la Commission européenne, Direction générale de l'aide humanitaire et de la protection civile (ECHO) et le Bureau du Foreign Disaster Assistance des États-Unis (OFDA) de l'USAID. Pour en savoir plus, s'il vous plaît visitez le site Web de la CMN à
http://www.coverage-monitoring.org/
Veuillez suivre le lien ci-dessous pour accéder au rapport complet du CMN sur la couverture du projet PCMA dans le district de Fada N’Gourma:
http://www.coverage-monitoring.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ACF-SQUEAC-BF-GOURMA-2014-VF.pdf
","","","","","","","Action Against Hunger (AAH) / Action contre la faim (ACF)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Government","Development","L’Agence Suédoise de Développement International (ASDI)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23193","","Management of severe acute malnutrition","","","","SAM child","Enfants de 0 à 59 mois","District de Fada N’Gourma","Community-based|Primary health care center","","Les interventions concernaient au départ deux communes à savoir Matiacoali et Diabo. En mai 2013, l’appui d’ACF au district s’est étendu à l’ensemble des 6 communes dans les 39 Centre de Santé et de Promotion Sociale (CSPS), le CHR et le Centre de Récupération et d’Education Nutritionnelle (CREN) confessionnel toujours avec un financement d’ASDI. Le programme appuie régulièrement le district dans la prise en charge. ACF assure également une approche NAC (Nutrition à Assise Communautaire) à travers son partenaire Groupe de Recherche et d’Echange Technologique (GRET) qui intervient dans le DS de Fada depuis 2009.
","La SQUEAC c´est une évaluation semi‐quantitative parce que combinant des données quantitatives et qualitatives:
- Données quantitatives: données de routine (admissions, abandons, indicateurs de performance) et données collectées (cas couverts et cas non couverts) au cours d’enquêtes sur petites et grandes zones.
- Données qualitatives: informations (opinions, connaissances sur la malnutrition, connaissances du programme de PEC, perception de la malnutrition, recours aux soins, facteurs limitant la PEC…) collectées auprès la communauté, des acteurs et bénéficiaires impliqués dans le service.
Une investigation de la couverture du programme de prise en charge de la MAS dans le district a été conduite du 15 janvier au 11 février 2014 en utilisant la méthodologie « Semi Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage » (SQUEAC). L´outil SQUEAC permet d´assurer à moindre coût un monitoring régulier des programmes et d´identifier les zones de couverture faible ou élevée ainsi que les raisons expliquant ces situations. L’ensemble de ces informations permet de planifier des actions spécifiques et concrètes dans le but d’améliorer la couverture des programmes concernés.
La méthodologie SQUEAC se compose de trois étapes principales:
L’étape 1 consiste à identifier les zones de couverture élevée ou faible et des barrières à l’accessibilité
L’étape 2 permet de vérifier des hypothèses sur les zones de couverture faible ou élevée au moyen d’enquêtes sur petites zones
L’étape 3 permet d’estimer la couverture globale à travers la construction d’un « a priori » (basé sur les barrières et les boosters), de l’Évidence Vraisemblable et d’un « post priori » basé sur la recherche de cas.
Les analyses quantitatives et qualitatives ont revele un nombre relativement important de points d’attention en terme de depistage, acces et qualite de soins, freins et pesanteurs socioculturels, difficultes de notification des cas, qui, sans enlever l’appreciation positive de ce resultat meritent neanmoins le renforcement de l’accompagnement des activites de PeC dans le district.
L’implication communautaire: insuffisance de communication des ICP avec les ASBC et faible motivation des ASBC, faible implication des autorites et des leaders dans la PeC, faible interet des hommes dans la sante des enfants…
L’organisation des activités communautaires: bien que la population soit informee du role des ASBC au sein de la communaute, il y a une insuffisance de connaissance sur la malnutrition, le programme de prise en charge. Il devient donc important de revoir l’approche de sensibilisation communautaire pour en ameliorer l’impact et assurer une meilleure implication des agents de santé communautaire.
Les dysfonctionnements au niveau de la prise en charge: long temps d’attente, rejet ou limitation du nombre de cas PeC par jour, mauvais accueil, l’insuffisance de depistage systematique en consultation curative …
Les facteurs socio-culturels, notamment pour le recours aux soins, le refus de certains maris ou des interdictions faites aux meres, le recours a la geomancie, les pratiques ancrees nefastes.
L’occupation des mères: Travaux menagers, travaux champetres, faible implication des hommes…
Les problèmes de distance, d’enclavement ou d’eloignement temporaires dans les hameaux de culture, s’ils n’ont pas ete demontres comme un facteur determinant a la couverture (voir resultats de la petite enquete), peuvent avoir un impact sur la qualite du service, notamment au niveau de la gestion des intrants, et de la disponibilite des agents de sante. En effet, la fluctuation des admissions ne permet pas aux agents de santé d’évaluer correctement les quantités d’intrants nécessaires par mois.
Tous ces facteurs ont un impact négatif sur la fréquentation des services de PCIMA et méritent de se pencher sur l’amélioration de :
- La régularité et la qualité des dépistages
- La qualité de l’accueil et de la PCIMA
- L’identification et la recherche précoce des absents ou abandons
- Les méthodes de communication pour les changements de comportement en pratiques de soins
- La coordination des activités des ONG.
Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP) is an ongoing conditional cash programme where families with pregnant and lactating mothers and/or children less than 7 years of age, with monthly per capita income ceilings of US$ 57 (moderately poor) and US$ 29 (extremely poor), receive monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income. Conditions for receipt of the transfer included regular pre- and postnatal care, growth monitoring, immunization, and participation in nutrition education seminars. BFP coverag in 2006 was approximately 100% of the poor and 25% of the total Brazilian population.
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of BFP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where BFP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 84-540/hd/year.Public expenditure for the BFP in 2005 was US$ 3.2 billion, equivalent to 0.36% of GDP. World Bank support for the programme was about US$ 562 million from 2003–2009, or approximately US$ 93.7 million/year(Monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income)","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23303","","Conditional cash transfer","","","","Family ( living in same household)","Families with pregnant and lactating mothers and children less than 7 years of age with monthly per capita income ceilings of US$ 57 (moderately poor) and US$ 29 (extremely poor).","","Community-based","","Monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income ceilings of US$ 57 (moderately poor) and US$ 29 (extremely poor).
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
","Evaluation data from the BFP is limited, but a positive impact has been reported; stunting among beneficiary children aged 6–11 months was 3.3 ppt lower (2 versus 5.3) than nonbeneficiary children. However, the results are questionable due to selection bias. Study results may also be limited (especially for children aged 12–36 months) by supply-side constraints restricting health services, irregular growth monitoring despite the conditionality, and lack of information on timing of enrollment.
","","in 2006 was 11.1 million families (46 million persons), approximately 100% of the poor and 25% of the total Brazilian population.","","","","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23304","Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP)","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","","","on-going","","","Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP) is an ongoing conditional cash programme where families with pregnant and lactating mothers and/or children less than 7 years of age, with monthly per capita income ceilings of US$ 57 (moderately poor) and US$ 29 (extremely poor), receive monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income. Conditions for receipt of the transfer included regular pre- and postnatal care, growth monitoring, immunization, and participation in nutrition education seminars. BFP coverag in 2006 was approximately 100% of the poor and 25% of the total Brazilian population.
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of BFP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where BFP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 84-540/hd/year.Public expenditure for the BFP in 2005 was US$ 3.2 billion, equivalent to 0.36% of GDP. World Bank support for the programme was about US$ 562 million from 2003–2009, or approximately US$ 93.7 million/year(Monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income)","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23305","","Growth monitoring and promotion","","","","Infants and young children|Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","Children below 7 years of age","","Community-based","","Regular growth monitoring in order to receive cash transfer
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
","Evaluation data from the BFP is limited, but a positive impact has been reported; stunting among beneficiary children aged 6–11 months was 3.3 ppt lower (2 versus 5.3) than nonbeneficiary children. However, the results are questionable due to selection bias. Study results may also be limited (especially for children aged 12–36 months) by supply-side constraints restricting health services, irregular growth monitoring despite the conditionality, and lack of information on timing of enrollment.
","","11.1 million families (46 million persons), approximately 100% of the poor and 25% of the total Brazilian population","","","","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23304","Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP)","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","","","on-going","","","Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP) is an ongoing conditional cash programme where families with pregnant and lactating mothers and/or children less than 7 years of age, with monthly per capita income ceilings of US$ 57 (moderately poor) and US$ 29 (extremely poor), receive monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income. Conditions for receipt of the transfer included regular pre- and postnatal care, growth monitoring, immunization, and participation in nutrition education seminars. BFP coverag in 2006 was approximately 100% of the poor and 25% of the total Brazilian population.
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of BFP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where BFP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 84-540/hd/year.Public expenditure for the BFP in 2005 was US$ 3.2 billion, equivalent to 0.36% of GDP. World Bank support for the programme was about US$ 562 million from 2003–2009, or approximately US$ 93.7 million/year(Monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income)","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23306","","Nutrition education and counselling","","","","Lactating women (LW)|Pregnant women (PW)","Caretakers of children below the age of 7","","Community-based","","Regular participation in nutrition education seminars
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
","Evaluation data from the BFP is limited, but a positive impact has been reported; stunting among beneficiary children aged 6–11 months was 3.3 ppt lower (2 versus 5.3) than nonbeneficiary children. However, the results are questionable due to selection bias. Study results may also be limited (especially for children aged 12–36 months) by supply-side constraints restricting health services, irregular growth monitoring despite the conditionality, and lack of information on timing of enrollment.
","","11.1 million families (46 million persons), approximately 100% of the poor and 25% of the total Brazilian population","","","","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23304","Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP)","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","","","on-going","","","Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP) is an ongoing conditional cash programme where families with pregnant and lactating mothers and/or children less than 7 years of age, with monthly per capita income ceilings of US$ 57 (moderately poor) and US$ 29 (extremely poor), receive monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income. Conditions for receipt of the transfer included regular pre- and postnatal care, growth monitoring, immunization, and participation in nutrition education seminars. BFP coverag in 2006 was approximately 100% of the poor and 25% of the total Brazilian population.
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of BFP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where BFP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 84-540/hd/year.Public expenditure for the BFP in 2005 was US$ 3.2 billion, equivalent to 0.36% of GDP. World Bank support for the programme was about US$ 562 million from 2003–2009, or approximately US$ 93.7 million/year(Monthly cash transfers range from US$ 7–US$ 45 per family depending upon eligibility as determined by monthly per capita income)","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23307","","Vaccination","","","","Family ( living in same household)","Families with pregnant and lactating mothers and children less than 7 years of age with monthly per capita income ceilings of US$ 57 (moderately poor) and US$ 29 (extremely poor).","","Community-based","","","","","","11.1 million families (46 million persons), approximately 100% of the poor and 25% of the total Brazilian population","","","","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23368","Third Community Health and Nutrition Project (CHN3)","English","Large scale programmes","","IDN","Indonesia","","","completed","","01-1970","CHN3 picked up where UPGK left off. CHN3 focused on capacity building, health information systems, education and service delivery in a province-based model in five provinces.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of CHN3 is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CHN3 is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 3.6 million investment by the World Bank. US$ 0.6 million investment by the Government of Indonesia","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Government of Indonesia","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23367","","Growth monitoring and promotion","","","","Infants and young children|Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)","Children below 5 years","","Community-based","","","
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","A World Bank evaluation of the project determined that design made the project difficult to supervise and that poor monitoring and evaluation of performance made assessment of project effectiveness difficult to determine
","","Focus on five provinces","","","From 1989 to 2003 underweight (<-2 SD WAZ) decreased from 37.5% to 27.5% (0.71 ppt/year) despite the financial crisis of the early 1990s. This decrease may be partially attributed to a reduction in birthrate in the lowest quintile of the population.","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","
Attempts to decentralize health interventions to the provincial level with CHN3 faced challenges of implementation and monitoring. Lack of baseline and surveillance data made effectiveness of these projects difficult to define.
","","English" "23368","Third Community Health and Nutrition Project (CHN3)","English","Large scale programmes","","IDN","Indonesia","","","completed","","01-1970","CHN3 picked up where UPGK left off. CHN3 focused on capacity building, health information systems, education and service delivery in a province-based model in five provinces.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of CHN3 is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CHN3 is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 3.6 million investment by the World Bank. US$ 0.6 million investment by the Government of Indonesia","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Government of Indonesia","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23369","","Nutrition education and counselling","","","","Lactating women (LW)|Pregnant women (PW)","","","Community-based","","","
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","A World Bank evaluation of the project determined that design made the project difficult to supervise and that poor monitoring and evaluation of performance made assessment of project effectiveness difficult to determine
","","Focus on five provinces","","","From 1989 to 2003 underweight (<-2 SD WAZ) decreased from 37.5% to 27.5% (0.71 ppt/year) despite the financial crisis of the early 1990s. This decrease may be partially attributed to a reduction in birthrate in the lowest quintile of the population.","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Attempts to decentralize health interventions to the provincial level with CHN3 faced challenges of implementation and monitoring. Lack of baseline and surveillance data made effectiveness of these projects difficult to define.
","","English" "23368","Third Community Health and Nutrition Project (CHN3)","English","Large scale programmes","","IDN","Indonesia","","","completed","","01-1970","CHN3 picked up where UPGK left off. CHN3 focused on capacity building, health information systems, education and service delivery in a province-based model in five provinces.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of CHN3 is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CHN3 is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","US$ 3.6 million investment by the World Bank. US$ 0.6 million investment by the Government of Indonesia","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Government of Indonesia","Government","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23370","","Food distribution/supplementation for prevention of acute malnutrition","","","","Infants and young children|Lactating women (LW)|Pregnant women (PW)|Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)|School age children (SAC)","","","Community-based","","
Internal provision supplemetary feeding
","Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","A World Bank evaluation of the project determined that design made the project difficult to supervise and that poor monitoring and evaluation of performance made assessment of project effectiveness difficult to determine
","","Focus on five provinces","","","From 1989 to 2003 underweight (<-2 SD WAZ) decreased from 37.5% to 27.5% (0.71 ppt/year) despite the financial crisis of the early 1990s. This decrease may be partially attributed to a reduction in birthrate in the lowest quintile of the population.","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Attempts to decentralize health interventions to the provincial level with CHN3 faced challenges of implementation and monitoring. Lack of baseline and surveillance data made effectiveness of these projects difficult to define
","","English" "23382","Oportunidades","English","Large scale programmes","","MEX","Mexico","","Urban|Rural","on-going","","","Oportunidades (known as Progresa from 1997–2002) is a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme in operation at the time of writing. It was initiated in rural areas and expanded to include urban areas beginning in 2002, although approximately 70% of programme participants reside in rural areas. Targeting for Oportunidades is based on both geography, through identification of localities with high marginality indices, and socioeconomic status, through proxy means testing. Approximately 60 % of households in the bottom decile of per capita expenditures are participants, suggesting effective targeting of the poorest.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of Oportunidades is retrieved from the ENA Part II where Oportunidades is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
The health and nutrition transfer component of Oportunidades is US$ 15/household per month, about 20% of average monthly household expenditures. Receipt of transfer is conditional upon regular health visits for all children in which growth monitoring is included, pre- and postnatal care for women, and adult (greater than 15 years of age) participation in health and nutrition education sessions.
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","Multiple evaluations of Oportunidades have been conducted with data demonstrating significant improvements in nutritional outcomes.
","","5 million families, approximately 20 % of the population","","","Increase in height in children 0–6 months of 1.1 cm (26.4 cm versus 25.3 cm) in programme beneficiaries compared to a control group. In rural children ages 12–24 months, a significant increase in mean hemoglobin of 0.37 g/dl was found after 12 months in the programme; 11.12 g/dl in the treatment group compared to 10.75 g/dl in the controls. Corresponding anaemia prevalence among beneficiary children was 44.3% compared to 54.9% among control children, a significant 10.6 ppt decrease. Even with improvement, nearly half of beneficiary children were still anaemic.","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23382","Oportunidades","English","Large scale programmes","","MEX","Mexico","","Urban|Rural","on-going","","","Oportunidades (known as Progresa from 1997–2002) is a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme in operation at the time of writing. It was initiated in rural areas and expanded to include urban areas beginning in 2002, although approximately 70% of programme participants reside in rural areas. Targeting for Oportunidades is based on both geography, through identification of localities with high marginality indices, and socioeconomic status, through proxy means testing. Approximately 60 % of households in the bottom decile of per capita expenditures are participants, suggesting effective targeting of the poorest.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of Oportunidades is retrieved from the ENA Part II where Oportunidades is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
Regular health visits for all children in which growth monitoring is included
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","Multiple evaluations of Oportunidades have been conducted with data demonstrating significant improvements in nutritional outcomes.
","","5 million families, approximately 20 % of the population","","","Increase in height in children 0–6 months of 1.1 cm (26.4 cm versus 25.3 cm) in programme beneficiaries compared to a control group","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23382","Oportunidades","English","Large scale programmes","","MEX","Mexico","","Urban|Rural","on-going","","","Oportunidades (known as Progresa from 1997–2002) is a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme in operation at the time of writing. It was initiated in rural areas and expanded to include urban areas beginning in 2002, although approximately 70% of programme participants reside in rural areas. Targeting for Oportunidades is based on both geography, through identification of localities with high marginality indices, and socioeconomic status, through proxy means testing. Approximately 60 % of households in the bottom decile of per capita expenditures are participants, suggesting effective targeting of the poorest.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of Oportunidades is retrieved from the ENA Part II where Oportunidades is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
Adult (greater than 15 years of age) participation in health and nutrition education sessions
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","Multiple evaluations of Oportunidades have been conducted with data demonstrating significant improvements in nutritional outcomes.
","","5 million families, approximately 20 % of the population","","","Increase in height in children 0–6 months of 1.1 cm (26.4 cm versus 25.3 cm) in programme beneficiaries compared to a control group (35). In rural children ages 12–24 months, a significant increase in mean hemoglobin of 0.37 g/dl was found after 12 months in the programme; 11.12 g/dl in the treatment group compared to 10.75 g/dl in the controls. Corresponding anaemia prevalence among beneficiary children was 44.3% compared to 54.9% among control children, a significant 10.6 ppt decrease. Even with improvement, nearly half of beneficiary children were still anaemic","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23382","Oportunidades","English","Large scale programmes","","MEX","Mexico","","Urban|Rural","on-going","","","Oportunidades (known as Progresa from 1997–2002) is a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme in operation at the time of writing. It was initiated in rural areas and expanded to include urban areas beginning in 2002, although approximately 70% of programme participants reside in rural areas. Targeting for Oportunidades is based on both geography, through identification of localities with high marginality indices, and socioeconomic status, through proxy means testing. Approximately 60 % of households in the bottom decile of per capita expenditures are participants, suggesting effective targeting of the poorest.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of Oportunidades is retrieved from the ENA Part II where Oportunidades is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
The nutrition supplement is intended to provide 20% of daily caloric and 100% of daily micronutrient requirements.
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","Multiple evaluations of Oportunidades have been conducted with data demonstrating significant improvements in nutritional outcomes.
","","5 million families, approximately 20 % of the population","","","An increase in height in children 0–6 months of 1.1 cm (26.4 cm versus 25.3 cm) in programme beneficiaries compared to a control group. In rural children ages 12–24 months, a significant increase in mean hemoglobin of 0.37 g/dl was found after 12 months in the programme; 11.12 g/dl in the treatment group compared to 10.75 g/dl in the controls. Corresponding anaemia prevalence among beneficiary children was 44.3% compared to 54.9% among control children, a significant 10.6 ppt decrease. Even with improvement, nearly half of beneficiary children were still anaemic.","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23382","Oportunidades","English","Large scale programmes","","MEX","Mexico","","Urban|Rural","on-going","","","Oportunidades (known as Progresa from 1997–2002) is a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme in operation at the time of writing. It was initiated in rural areas and expanded to include urban areas beginning in 2002, although approximately 70% of programme participants reside in rural areas. Targeting for Oportunidades is based on both geography, through identification of localities with high marginality indices, and socioeconomic status, through proxy means testing. Approximately 60 % of households in the bottom decile of per capita expenditures are participants, suggesting effective targeting of the poorest.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of Oportunidades is retrieved from the ENA Part II where Oportunidades is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
Mean haemoglobin
Anemia prevalence
","Multiple evaluations of Oportunidades have been conducted with data demonstrating significant improvements in nutritional outcomes.
","","5 million families, approximately 20 % of the population","","","In rural children ages 12–24 months, a significant increase in mean hemoglobin of 0.37 g/dl was found after 12 months in the programme; 11.12 g/dl in the treatment group compared to 10.75 g/dl in the controls. Corresponding anaemia prevalence among beneficiary children was 44.3% compared to 54.9% among control children, a significant 10.6 ppt decrease. Even with improvement, nearly half of beneficiary children were still anaemic","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23389","Red de Proteccion Social Program (RPS)","English","Community/sub-national","","NIC","Nicaragua","nicaragua","","completed","","01-1970","The Red de Protección Social Programme (RPS) ran from 2000–2005. It was a small-scale CCT programme. Both geographical and household targeting was used for implementation in departments and municipalities with high rates of extreme poverty.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of RPS is retrieved from the ENA Part II where RPS I is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Total funding was US$ 38 million.RPS participants received a nutrition/food security transfer equivalent to US$ 18/month","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","Inter American Development Bank","Government of Nicaragua ","Government","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23388","","Conditional cash transfer","","","","Infants and young children|Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)","Children below 5 years","","Community-based","","RPS participants received a nutrition/food security transfer equivalent to US$ 18/month upon confirmation that conditions were met. The transfer was equivalent to approximately 18% average monthly household expenditure. Conditions for receipt of the transfer included: monthly growth monitoring for children less than 24 months (every other month for children ages 2–5 years), participation in nutrition and health education sessions on topics such as breastfeeding, hygiene and feeding practices, regular vaccinations for children, and routine care for pregnant women. Antiparasitic medications and iron supplements were also provided.
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","","","165 000 persons (approximately 3 % of the population)","","","An increase in HAZ of 0.17 was reported for beneficiary children and stunting decreased in RPS versus control groups by 5.5 ppt. A significant change in underweight was also reported; it decreased in RPS areas (13.7% to 9.8%) while it increased in control areas (14.3% to 16.6%). ","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23389","Red de Proteccion Social Program (RPS)","English","Community/sub-national","","NIC","Nicaragua","nicaragua","","completed","","01-1970","The Red de Protección Social Programme (RPS) ran from 2000–2005. It was a small-scale CCT programme. Both geographical and household targeting was used for implementation in departments and municipalities with high rates of extreme poverty.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of RPS is retrieved from the ENA Part II where RPS I is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Total funding was US$ 38 million.RPS participants received a nutrition/food security transfer equivalent to US$ 18/month","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","Inter American Development Bank","Government of Nicaragua ","Government","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23390","","Growth monitoring and promotion","","","","Infants and young children|Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)","Children below 5 years","","Community-based","","Monthly growth monitoring for children less than 24 months (every other month for children ages 2–5 years)
","","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","","165 000 persons (approximately 3 % of the population)","","","An increase in HAZ of 0.17 was reported for beneficiary children and stunting decreased in RPS versus control groups by 5.5 ppt. A significant change in underweight was also reported; it decreased in RPS areas (13.7% to 9.8%) while it increased in control areas (14.3% to 16.6%).","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23389","Red de Proteccion Social Program (RPS)","English","Community/sub-national","","NIC","Nicaragua","nicaragua","","completed","","01-1970","The Red de Protección Social Programme (RPS) ran from 2000–2005. It was a small-scale CCT programme. Both geographical and household targeting was used for implementation in departments and municipalities with high rates of extreme poverty.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of RPS is retrieved from the ENA Part II where RPS I is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Total funding was US$ 38 million.RPS participants received a nutrition/food security transfer equivalent to US$ 18/month","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","Inter American Development Bank","Government of Nicaragua ","Government","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23391","","Breastfeeding promotion and/or counselling","","","","Lactating women (LW)|Pregnant women (PW)","Mothers of children under two","","Community-based","","Participation in nutrition and health education on breastfeeding in order to receive ransfer
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","","","165 000 persons (approximately 3 % of the population)","","","An increase in HAZ of 0.17 was reported for beneficiary children and stunting decreased in RPS versus control groups by 5.5 ppt. A significant change in underweight was also reported; it decreased in RPS areas (13.7% to 9.8%) while it increased in control areas (14.3% to 16.6%).","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23389","Red de Proteccion Social Program (RPS)","English","Community/sub-national","","NIC","Nicaragua","nicaragua","","completed","","01-1970","The Red de Protección Social Programme (RPS) ran from 2000–2005. It was a small-scale CCT programme. Both geographical and household targeting was used for implementation in departments and municipalities with high rates of extreme poverty.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of RPS is retrieved from the ENA Part II where RPS I is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Total funding was US$ 38 million.RPS participants received a nutrition/food security transfer equivalent to US$ 18/month","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","Inter American Development Bank","Government of Nicaragua ","Government","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23392","","Complementary feeding promotion and/or counselling","","","","Infants and young children","Mothers of children under two years of age","","Community-based","","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","","","165 000 persons (approximately 3 % of the population)","","","An increase in HAZ of 0.17 was reported for beneficiary children and stunting decreased in RPS versus control groups by 5.5 ppt. A significant change in underweight was also reported; it decreased in RPS areas (13.7% to 9.8%) while it increased in control areas (14.3% to 16.6%). ","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23389","Red de Proteccion Social Program (RPS)","English","Community/sub-national","","NIC","Nicaragua","nicaragua","","completed","","01-1970","The Red de Protección Social Programme (RPS) ran from 2000–2005. It was a small-scale CCT programme. Both geographical and household targeting was used for implementation in departments and municipalities with high rates of extreme poverty.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of RPS is retrieved from the ENA Part II where RPS I is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Total funding was US$ 38 million.RPS participants received a nutrition/food security transfer equivalent to US$ 18/month","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","Inter American Development Bank","Government of Nicaragua ","Government","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23393","","Promotion of improved hygiene practices including handwashing","","","","Women of reproductive age (WRA)","","","Community-based","","The Red de Protección Social Programme (RPS) ran from 2000–2005. It was a small-scale CCT programme. Both geographical and household targeting was used for implementation in departments and municipalities with high rates of extreme poverty.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of RPS is retrieved from the ENA Part II where RPS I is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Total funding was US$ 38 million.RPS participants received a nutrition/food security transfer equivalent to US$ 18/month","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","Inter American Development Bank","Government of Nicaragua ","Government","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23394","","Iron supplementation","","Iron","","Infants and young children|Preschool-age children (Pre-SAC)","Children below 5 years","","Community-based","","","","","","165 000 persons (approximately 3 % of the population)","","","","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23389","Red de Proteccion Social Program (RPS)","English","Community/sub-national","","NIC","Nicaragua","nicaragua","","completed","","01-1970","The Red de Protección Social Programme (RPS) ran from 2000–2005. It was a small-scale CCT programme. Both geographical and household targeting was used for implementation in departments and municipalities with high rates of extreme poverty.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of RPS is retrieved from the ENA Part II where RPS I is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Total funding was US$ 38 million.RPS participants received a nutrition/food security transfer equivalent to US$ 18/month","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","Inter American Development Bank","Government of Nicaragua ","Government","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23395","","Nutrition education and counselling","","","","Women of reproductive age (WRA)","Mothers of children under five years of age","","Community-based","","Participation in nutrition and health education sessions in order to receive conditional cash transfer
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","","","165 000 persons (approximately 3 % of the population)","","","An increase in HAZ of 0.17 was reported for beneficiary children and stunting decreased in RPS versus control groups by 5.5 ppt. A significant change in underweight was also reported; it decreased in RPS areas (13.7% to 9.8%) while it increased in control areas (14.3% to 16.6%). ","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23287","The Child Pastorate Programme (CPP) ","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","","","on-going","","","The Child Pastorate Programme (CPP) is an ongoing large-scale programme in Brazil. In 2001 CPP coverage by area was about 63% (5140/8159 parishes), providing services to 32 265 communities. Coverage by population for the same year was about 1.6 million children less than 6 years of age (9.8% of total population for age group), in addition to more than 77 000 pregnant women.
The programme also included micronutrient supplementation to lactating women and children below 6 years of age, and referral through at home visits by community worker.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of CCP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CCP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Catholic Church of Brazil","Resource intensity for the CPP is US$ 4/person per year and personnel intensity is 1 community worker: 37 children less than 6 years of age. Total funding for the programme for 1999-2000 was US$ 6.9 million.","Government","Health","Ministry of Health","Government","Education and research","Ministry of Education","Private sector","Private sector","GLOBO TV Network","UN","United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)","At home visits by community worker
","Exclusive breastfeeding
Weight
Increased weight
Malnoursihment
","Internal evaluation were conducted from 1988 - 2001 reported an increase in EBF during the first 4 months (from 60% to 80%), decreases in malnourished children (from 18% to 4%) and pregnant women (from 20% to 4%). External evaluation data are unavalable.
","","In 2001: 77000 pregnant women ","","","Participants' sustained rate of underweight reduction: 1.1 ppt/year
","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23287","The Child Pastorate Programme (CPP) ","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","","","on-going","","","The Child Pastorate Programme (CPP) is an ongoing large-scale programme in Brazil. In 2001 CPP coverage by area was about 63% (5140/8159 parishes), providing services to 32 265 communities. Coverage by population for the same year was about 1.6 million children less than 6 years of age (9.8% of total population for age group), in addition to more than 77 000 pregnant women.
The programme also included micronutrient supplementation to lactating women and children below 6 years of age, and referral through at home visits by community worker.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of CCP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CCP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Catholic Church of Brazil","Resource intensity for the CPP is US$ 4/person per year and personnel intensity is 1 community worker: 37 children less than 6 years of age. Total funding for the programme for 1999-2000 was US$ 6.9 million.","Government","Health","Ministry of Health","Government","Education and research","Ministry of Education","Private sector","Private sector","GLOBO TV Network","UN","United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)","At home visits by community worker
","Weight
Increased Weight
Malnourishment
","Internal evaluations from 1988 - 2001 reported decreases in malnourished children (from 18% to 4%) and low birth weight (from 14% to 6%). External evaluations are not available.
","","1.6 million children less than 6 years of age (9.8% of total population for age group)","","","Participants' sustained rate of underweight reduction: 1.1 ppt/year
","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23287","The Child Pastorate Programme (CPP) ","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","","","on-going","","","The Child Pastorate Programme (CPP) is an ongoing large-scale programme in Brazil. In 2001 CPP coverage by area was about 63% (5140/8159 parishes), providing services to 32 265 communities. Coverage by population for the same year was about 1.6 million children less than 6 years of age (9.8% of total population for age group), in addition to more than 77 000 pregnant women.
The programme also included micronutrient supplementation to lactating women and children below 6 years of age, and referral through at home visits by community worker.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of CCP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CCP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Catholic Church of Brazil","Resource intensity for the CPP is US$ 4/person per year and personnel intensity is 1 community worker: 37 children less than 6 years of age. Total funding for the programme for 1999-2000 was US$ 6.9 million.","Government","Health","Ministry of Health","Government","Education and research","Ministry of Education","Private sector","Private sector","GLOBO TV Network","UN","United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)","At home visits by community worker
","Weight
Increased weight
Malnourishment
","Internal evaluations were conducted from 1988–2001 with reported decreases in malnourished children (from 18% to 4%) and pregnant women (from 20% to 4%), as well
as low birth weight (from 14% to 6%). External evaluation data are unavailable.
","","1.6 million children less than 6 years of age (9.8% of total population for age group). More than 77 000 pregnant women.","","","Participants' sustained rate of underweight reduction: 1.1 ppt/year
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23287","The Child Pastorate Programme (CPP) ","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","","","on-going","","","The Child Pastorate Programme (CPP) is an ongoing large-scale programme in Brazil. In 2001 CPP coverage by area was about 63% (5140/8159 parishes), providing services to 32 265 communities. Coverage by population for the same year was about 1.6 million children less than 6 years of age (9.8% of total population for age group), in addition to more than 77 000 pregnant women.
The programme also included micronutrient supplementation to lactating women and children below 6 years of age, and referral through at home visits by community worker.
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of CCP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where CCP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Other","Catholic Church of Brazil","Resource intensity for the CPP is US$ 4/person per year and personnel intensity is 1 community worker: 37 children less than 6 years of age. Total funding for the programme for 1999-2000 was US$ 6.9 million.","Government","Health","Ministry of Health","Government","Education and research","Ministry of Education","Private sector","Private sector","GLOBO TV Network","UN","United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)","At home vists by community worker
","Weight
Increased weight
Malnourishement
","Internal evaluations were conducted from 1988–2001 with reported decreases in malnourished children (from 18% to 4%) and pregnant women (from 20% to 4%), as well as low birth weight (from 14% to 6%). An increase in EBF during the first 4 months was also reported (from 60% to 80%). External evaluation data are unavailable.
","","More than 77 000 pregnant women","","","Participants' sustained rate of underweight reduction: 1.1 ppt/year
","Vulnerable groups","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23294","Integrated Management Childhood Illness (IMCI)","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","brazil","","on-going","","","The Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) was implemented in Brazil in 1997 and by 2002 had begun in all states, within the context of the Family Health Programme. Coverage reported for the Family Health Programme is variable since municipalities must apply to the federal government and make a financial contribution to join the programme.
The programme also included referral by the community nutrition centre.
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of IMCI is retrieved from the ENA Part II where IMCI is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Intensity of community health workers is reported as 1 per 100–200 families","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Ministry of health","Government","Health","The impact of IMCI on nutritional status in Brazil has not been reported.
","","N/A","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23294","Integrated Management Childhood Illness (IMCI)","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","brazil","","on-going","","","The Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) was implemented in Brazil in 1997 and by 2002 had begun in all states, within the context of the Family Health Programme. Coverage reported for the Family Health Programme is variable since municipalities must apply to the federal government and make a financial contribution to join the programme.
The programme also included referral by the community nutrition centre.
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of IMCI is retrieved from the ENA Part II where IMCI is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Intensity of community health workers is reported as 1 per 100–200 families","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Ministry of health","Government","Health","The impact of IMCI on nutritional status in Brazil has not been reported.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23294","Integrated Management Childhood Illness (IMCI)","English","Large scale programmes","","BRA","Brazil","brazil","","on-going","","","The Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) was implemented in Brazil in 1997 and by 2002 had begun in all states, within the context of the Family Health Programme. Coverage reported for the Family Health Programme is variable since municipalities must apply to the federal government and make a financial contribution to join the programme.
The programme also included referral by the community nutrition centre.
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of IMCI is retrieved from the ENA Part II where IMCI is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrit...
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Intensity of community health workers is reported as 1 per 100–200 families","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","The World Bank","Ministry of health","Government","Health","The impact of IMCI on nutritional status in Brazil has not been reported.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23312","Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP)","English","Large scale programmes","","ETH","Ethiopia","","","on-going","","","The Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP) provides direct budgetary support through a multi-donor trust fund. Outside of South Africa, PSNP is the largest social protection programme in sub-Saharan Africa. PSNP employs geographic, administrative and community-based targeting to identify chronically food-insecure populations. The objective of the programme is to improve food security and prevent vulnerable households from having to sell assets (nutrition is not explicitly addressed).
","WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of PSNP is retrieved from the ENA Part II where PSNP is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Resource intensity estimated at US$ 47,37/hd/year. The annual budget is around US$ 360 million. Per capita, cash and food transfers totaled US$ 32.8 for male-headed households and US$ 37.1 for female-headed households in 2007.","Government","","Government of Ethiopia","UN","Other","Other donors providing direct budgetary support through a multi-donor trust fund","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23311","","Conditional cash transfer","","","","Family ( living in same household)","","","Community-based","","Cash and/or in-kind support is provided to targeted households in exchange for labour-intensive public works to build community assets.
Labourpoor households (i.e. female-headed households with young children, the elderly, pregnant or lactating women (PLWs)) receive unconditional transfers
","Anthropometry
","An impact evaluation in 2008 found no significant change in anthropometric status of children in PSNP households compared to non-PSNP households. However, participation had positive effects on use of education and health services and household food security, caloric acquisition, and asset protection.
","","Nearly 10% of the country (7.6 million people), covering more than 40% of the woredas.","","","No change in anthropometric status of children.
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23338","Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C)","English","Large scale programmes","","HND","Honduras","","","on-going","","","The national Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C) began in the mid- 1990s and remains in operation at the time of writing as a community-based expansion from the original AIN programme.
Referral to the health facility as needed
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of AIN-C is retrieved from the ENA Part II where AIN-C is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Intensity as measured by Community Health and Nutrition Workers (CHNWs):children is 3:25, where CHNWs work part-time for 3.5 hours weekly. Financial resource intensity is US$ 6.43/child per year","Government","Health","Ministry of Health","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","US Agency for International Development (USAID)","Monthly growth monitoring of children less than 24 months of age and sick children 24–60 months of age at the community centre, although home visits are provided for children who do not attend.
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","Evaluation of the AIN-C was planned as a pre- and post-intervention, project and control comparison study, but the design was altered due to extensive contamination of control communities, non-equivalent groups, and reduced intensity of programme implementation due to changes in funding. A cross-sectional study using baseline data compared AIN-C. participants to non-participants.
Mean height-for-age was lower in the AIN-C group as compared to non-participants at less than six months of age. At 6–11 months and 12–23 months of age, there was no difference between AIN-C children and nonparticipants, suggesting a protective effect of AIN-C against growth faltering. Since a pre-/post- comparison was not possible, this conclusion cannot be certain. Intensity of participation in the programme was based on percentage of possible weighings attended by the child; after controlling for household assets and age of child, for every 1% increase in participation intensity, weight-for-age increased 0.005 z-score.
","","Coverage of the programme by area was 24 of 42 health areas (>50%) in 2006 and by population was 90% of children less than 24 months of age.","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23338","Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C)","English","Large scale programmes","","HND","Honduras","","","on-going","","","The national Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C) began in the mid- 1990s and remains in operation at the time of writing as a community-based expansion from the original AIN programme.
Referral to the health facility as needed
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of AIN-C is retrieved from the ENA Part II where AIN-C is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Intensity as measured by Community Health and Nutrition Workers (CHNWs):children is 3:25, where CHNWs work part-time for 3.5 hours weekly. Financial resource intensity is US$ 6.43/child per year","Government","Health","Ministry of Health","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","US Agency for International Development (USAID)","Nutrition counselling for EBF less than 6 months of age
","Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates
","Evaluation of the AIN-C was planned as a pre- and post-intervention, project and control comparison study, but the design was altered due to extensive contamination of control communities, non-equivalent groups, and reduced intensity of programme implementation due to changes in funding. A cross-sectional study using baseline data compared AIN-C participants to non-participants. Improved caring practices were reported among AIN-C mothers. A 15.8 ppt difference in EBF at 6 months was found (55.8% AIN-C, 40% non- AIN-C).
","","24 of 42 health areas (>50%) in 2006 (18), and by population was 90% of children less than 24 months of age.","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23338","Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C)","English","Large scale programmes","","HND","Honduras","","","on-going","","","The national Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C) began in the mid- 1990s and remains in operation at the time of writing as a community-based expansion from the original AIN programme.
Referral to the health facility as needed
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of AIN-C is retrieved from the ENA Part II where AIN-C is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Intensity as measured by Community Health and Nutrition Workers (CHNWs):children is 3:25, where CHNWs work part-time for 3.5 hours weekly. Financial resource intensity is US$ 6.43/child per year","Government","Health","Ministry of Health","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","US Agency for International Development (USAID)","Micronutrient distribution for children (iron and vitamin A)
","","Evaluation of the AIN-C was planned as a pre- and post-intervention, project and control comparison study, but the design was altered due to extensive contamination of control communities, non-equivalent groups, and reduced intensity of programme implementation due to changes in funding. A cross-sectional study using baseline data compared AIN-C participants to non-participants. With regard to receiving iron and vitamin A supplementation, differences of 36.1 ppt (65.6% AIN-C, 29.5% non-AIN-C) and 6.8 ppt (94.3% AIN-C, 87.5% non-AIN-C) respectively, were reported for children.
","","Coverage of the programme by area was 24 of 42 health areas (>50%) in 2006 and by population was 90% of children less than 24 months of age.","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English" "23338","Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C)","English","Large scale programmes","","HND","Honduras","","","on-going","","","The national Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C) began in the mid- 1990s and remains in operation at the time of writing as a community-based expansion from the original AIN programme.
Referral to the health facility as needed
","
WHO (2013) Essential Nutrition Actions – Improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition, which provides a compact of WHO guidance on nutrition interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Part I presents the interventions currently recommended by WHO, summarizes the rationale and the evidence, and describes the actions require to implement them. Part II provides an analysis of community-based interventions aimed at improving nutrition and indicates how effective interventions can be delivered in an integrated fashion. It shows how the essential nutrition actions described in the first part have been implemented in large-scale programmes in various settings, what the outcomes have been, and to examine the evidence for attribution of changes in nutritional outcomes to programme activities. This summary of AIN-C is retrieved from the ENA Part II where AIN-C is one of 32 large-scale community-based programs that has been reviewed in detail and evaluated.
http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/essential_nutrition_actions/en/
","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Intensity as measured by Community Health and Nutrition Workers (CHNWs):children is 3:25, where CHNWs work part-time for 3.5 hours weekly. Financial resource intensity is US$ 6.43/child per year","Government","Health","Ministry of Health","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","US Agency for International Development (USAID)","Nutrition counselling for complementary feeding less than 24 months of age
","Height-for-age z-score (HAZ)
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
","Evaluation of the AIN-C was planned as a pre- and post-intervention, project and control comparison study, but the design was altered due to extensive contamination of control communities, non-equivalent groups, and reduced intensity of programme implementation due to changes in funding. A cross-sectional study using baseline data compared AIN-C. participants to non-participants. Mean height-for-age was lower in the AIN-C group as compared to non-participants at less than six months of age. At 6–11 months and 12–23 months of age, there was no difference between AIN-C children and nonparticipants, suggesting a protective effect of AIN-C against growth faltering. Since a pre-/ post- comparison was not possible, this conclusion cannot be certain. Intensity of participation in the programme was based on percentage of possible weighings attended by the child; after controlling for household assets and age of child, for every 1% increase in participation intensity, weight-for-age increased 0.005 z-score
","","Coverage of the programme by area was 24 of 42 health areas (>50%) in 2006 and by population was 90% of children less than 24 months of age.","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","English"