"programme_id","programme_title","programme_language","programme_type","other_program","iso3code","country_name","program_location","area","status","start_date","end_date","brief_description","references","related_policy","new_policy","partner_gov","partner_government_details","partner_un","partner_un_details","partner_ngo","partner_ngo_details","partner_donors","partner_donors_details","partner_intergov","partner_intgov_details","partner_national_ngo","partner_nat_ngo_details","partner_research","partner_research_details","partner_private","partner_private_details","partner_other","partner_other_details","cost","fsector_0","fpartner_0","fdetails_0","fsector_1","fpartner_1","fdetails_1","fsector_2","fpartner_2","fdetails_2","fsector_3","fpartner_3","fdetails_3","fsector_4","fpartner_4","fdetails_4","fsector_5","fpartner_5","fdetails_5","fsector_6","fpartner_6","fdetails_6","fsector_7","fpartner_7","fdetails_7","fsector_8","fpartner_8","fdetails_8","fsector_9","fpartner_9","fdetails_9","fsector_10","fpartner_10","fdetails_10","fsector_11","fpartner_11","fdetails_11","fsector_12","fpartner_12","fdetails_12","fsector_13","fpartner_13","fdetails_13","fsector_14","fpartner_14","fdetails_14","fsector_15","fpartner_15","fdetails_15","fsector_16","fpartner_16","fdetails_16","fsector_17","fpartner_17","fdetails_17","fsector_18","fpartner_18","fdetails_18","fsector_19","fpartner_19","fdetails_19","fsector_20","fpartner_20","fdetails_20","fsector_21","fpartner_21","fdetails_21","fsector_22","fpartner_22","fdetails_22","fsector_23","fpartner_23","fdetails_23","fsector_24","fpartner_24","fdetails_24","fsector_25","fpartner_25","fdetails_25","fsector_26","fpartner_26","fdetails_26","fsector_27","fpartner_27","fdetails_27","fsector_28","fpartner_28","fdetails_28","fsector_29","fpartner_29","fdetails_29","fsector_30","fpartner_30","fdetails_30","fsector_31","fpartner_31","fdetails_31","fsector_32","fpartner_32","fdetails_32","fsector_33","fpartner_33","fdetails_33","fsector_34","fpartner_34","fdetails_34","fsector_35","fpartner_35","fdetails_35","fsector_36","fpartner_36","fdetails_36","fsector_37","fpartner_37","fdetails_37","fsector_38","fpartner_38","fdetails_38","fsector_39","fpartner_39","fdetails_39","fsector_40","fpartner_40","fdetails_40","fsector_41","fpartner_41","fdetails_41","fsector_42","fpartner_42","fdetails_42","fsector_43","fpartner_43","fdetails_43","fsector_44","fpartner_44","fdetails_44","fsector_45","fpartner_45","fdetails_45","fsector_46","fpartner_46","fdetails_46","fsector_47","fpartner_47","fdetails_47","fsector_48","fpartner_48","fdetails_48","fsector_49","fpartner_49","fdetails_49","action_id","theme","topic","new_topic","micronutrient","micronutrient_compound","target_group","age_group","place","delivery","other_delivery","dose_frequency","impact_indicators","me_system","target_pop","coverage_percent","coverage_type","baseline","post_intervention","social_det","social_other","elena_link","problem_0","solution_0","problem_1","solution_1","problem_2","solution_2","problem_3","solution_3","problem_4","solution_4","problem_5","solution_5","problem_6","solution_6","problem_7","solution_7","problem_8","solution_8","problem_9","solution_9","other_problems","other_lessons","personal_story","language" "11493","Strengthening Agricultural Technologies among People Living with HIV: Lessons Learned in the Border Towns of Busia, Kenya and Busia, Uganda","English","Multi-national","","KEN|UGA","Kenya|Uganda","Busia, Kenya|Busia, Uganda","Rural|Peri-urban","completed","01-2007","01-2008","
The Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA) of the Academy for Educational Development (AED) and the Ministry of Health (MOH) AIDS Control Programs (ACPs) in Kenya and Uganda worked together between 2007 and 2008 to integrate nutrition into the activities of HIV support groups in the border towns of Busia Uganda and Busia Kenya, funded by USAID/East Africa. The aim was to build skills in nutrition and disseminate national materials on nutrition and HIV developed by the national ACPs. However, PLHIV in the border towns increasingly reported lack of access to adequate food, in terms of quantity and variety, as the main reason they could not apply the dietary practices recommended during counseling sessions. In response, between September 2007 and September 2008 FANTA and the ROADS Project collaborated to facilitate the diffusion and use of appropriate technologies to improve the productivity of PLHIV agricultural activities developed under the ROADS Project in the two border towns.
","http://www.fantaproject.org/downloads/pdfs/FANTA_Busia2008.pdf
","8762|8576|8430|8302|8241|8671|8237","","Food and agriculture","Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Culture and Social Services, Kenya│Ministry of Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF), Uganda│National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS), Uganda","","","Family Health International (incl.AED)","","","","","","National NGOs","AIDS Support Organisation; National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Uganda","Research/academia","Busia Agricultural Training Centre (BATC) in Kenya, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI)","","","Other","Africa 2000 Network","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","US Agency for International Development (USAID)","East Africa","Other","","Busia Parish Catholic Church, Kenya","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","11492","","Promotion of food security and agriculture","","","","Pregnant/lactating women with HIV/AIDS","","Busia , Kenya and Busia Uganda","Community-based","","The process involved identifying simple technologies to increase farm and garden outputs and linking clusters of people living with HIV (PLHIV) with local agricultural institutions including the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), Department of Culture and Social Services, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), and Busia Agricultural Training Centre (BATC) in Kenya and the MOA, Ministry of Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF), National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), and National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) in Uganda, as well as community development officers, community-based organizations (CBOs), and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in the districts. FANTA facilitated the development of a participatory learning process to motivate groups of PLHIV to learn the new technologies to increase farm and garden output.
In phase one of the participatory learning process, FANTA and ROADS helped members of the clusters and agricultural institutions understand the agricultural technologies used in Busia, Kenya and Busia, Uganda to improve productivity. Phase two facilitated a process of linking cluster with agricultural institutions to help cluster members implement existing technologies that they had not widely used and to assess the impact of the process on the adaptation of the technologies. Neither FANTA nor ROADS invested substantial funds in the process, but provide technical assistance and connected the clusters to locally available technical assistance and support.
Three sensitization meetings were held, one joint meeting between cluster representatives, the FHI Cluster Coordinators, and FANTA staff and two meetings with groups on either side of the border. The meetings laid the foundation for agreement on the purpose of the activity and sharing of expectations. Over a period of two weeks, the group representatives identified viable and interesting agricultural technologies used in their localities and discussed how easily they could be implemented by PLHIV living in the towns (urban setting) and how they could improve their food diversity. In meetings with the agricultural institutions (mainly from Kenya), examples of agricultural technologies and activities were identified and discussed. Ministry of Agriculture and BATC extension personnel were available in the meetings to explain the different technologies.
The cross-border learning process was initiated by 14 representatives of the Ugandan clusters, who visited their peers on the Kenyan side of the border in November 2007. For two days they visited homes and training centers to see different agricultural technologies and livelihood activities implemented in Kenya and discussed the
feasibility of their adoption in their own context. At BATC the Ugandan visitors toured all the Group identification of learning content and methodology Preliminary sensitization meetings with cluster groups Group consultative meetings Meetings of Cluster representatives with departments of agriculture, NGOs, research institutions, and farmer training Cross‐border learning and home visits Arrange meetings among ROADS representatives, cluster representatives from Kenya and Uganda, and FANTA. Explain the different technologies that could be used in the locale and by PLHIV. Agree on how groups would implement the technologies and priorities. Group consensus meetings See different technologies in the communities and discuss.
Visits were also made to school gardens, community land (e.g., belonging to clusters of orphans and vulnerable children [OVC] in Kenya), seed multiplication sites, and farmer training centers. The cluster members discussed opportunities for and challenges of implementing similar activities in the urban Uganda context. Group consensus meetings were held to prioritize what the clusters wanted to learn about and the optimal methods of learning.
","La Croix Rouge de Belgique, en partenariat avec la Croix Rouge burkinabè et les autorités sanitaires ont mis en oeuvre depuis 2007 un programm d’appui aux structures sanitaires dans neuf provinces réparties dans 3 régions (Sahel, Nord, Centre Ouest).Pour la région du Sahel, le passage à l’échelle s’est fait à partir de 2011 par des phases successives sous financement ECHO (European Community Humanitarian aid Office). Aujourd’hui, le programme couvre les 18 Centre de Santé et de Promotion Sociale (CSPS) du District Sanitaire de Gorom Gorom. Le programme est actuellement en phase 6, phase ayant débutée en mars 2013 qui prendra fin en janvier 2014. Cette phase prévoit de consolider l’appui au système de santé de la région du Sahel en vue d’accroitre son efficacité dans la prise en charge ambulatoire de la malnutrition aigüe à travers des appuis techniques et financiers touchant à la fois la qualité, la couverture, le suivi/évaluation et la capitalisation de la prise en charge de la malnutrition aigüe.
","Ce programme a été identifié par le biais du projet «Coverage Monitoring Network» (CMN). Le projet CMN est une initiative inter-agence qui vise à accroître et d'améliorer le suivi de la couverture de la gestion communautaire de la malnutrition aiguë (CMAM) programmes à l'échelle mondiale, et renforce les capacités des professionnels nationaux et internationaux de la nutrition. Sa vocation est de fournir un support technique et des outils aux programmes de PCMA afin de les aider à évaluer leur impact, de partager et capitaliser les leçons apprises sur les facteurs influençant leur performance. Le projet met l'accent sur le renforcement des compétences en méthodologie SQUEAC et SLEAC. Il est mis en œuvre par un consortium dirigé par ACF International, et comprend Save the Children, Concern Worldwide, International Medical Corps, Helen Keller International et Valid International. Le projet est financé par la Commission européenne, Direction générale de l'aide humanitaire et de la protection civile (ECHO) et le Bureau du Foreign Disaster Assistance des États-Unis (OFDA) de l'USAID. Pour en savoir plus, s'il vous plaît visitez le site Web de la CMN à
http://www.coverage-monitoring.org/
Veuillez suivre le lien ci-dessous pour accéder au rapport complet du CMN sur la couverture du projet PCMA dans le district de Gorom Gorom:
","","","","","","","International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","European Commission Humanitarian Aid & Civil Protection (ECHO)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23198","","Management of severe acute malnutrition","","","","SAM child","Enfants de 0 à 59 mois","District de Gorom Gorom","Community-based|Primary health care center","","Le cadre approprié pour la prise en charge de la malnutrition aiguë modérée est constitué des Centres de Santé et de Promotion Sociale (CSPS), des Centres Médicaux avec Antenne Chirurgicale (CMA) ou tout autre structure menant des activités de supplémentation alimentaire. En période d’urgence des Centres de Supplémentation Nutritionnelle (CSN) pourront être ouverts à cet effet.
Le cadre approprié de la prise en charge de la malnutrition sévère est le centre de récupération et d’éducation nutritionnelle (CREN). Son rôle principal est le traitement de la malnutrition sévère et l’éducation des familles en matière de nutrition.
Là où il n’existe pas de CREN, les CSPS doivent assurer une prise en charge en externe des cas adaptés à ce mode de traitement.
","La SQUEAC c´est une évaluation semi‐quantitative parce que combinant des données quantitatives et qualitatives:
Données quantitatives: données de routine (admissions, abandons, indicateurs de performance) et données collectées (cas couverts et cas non couverts) au cours d’enquêtes sur petites et grandes zones.
Données qualitatives: informations (opinions, connaissances sur la malnutrition, connaissances du programme de PEC, perception de la malnutrition, recours aux soins, facteurs limitant la PEC…) collectées auprès la communauté, des acteurs et bénéficiaires impliqués dans le service.
","Une investigation de la couverture du programme de prise en charge de la MAS dans le district a été conduite du 1 au 20 novembre 2013 en utilisant la méthodologie « Semi Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage » (SQUEAC). L´outil SQUEAC permet d´assurer à moindre coût un monitoring régulier des programmes et d´identifier les zones de couverture faible ou élevée ainsi que les raisons expliquant ces situations. L’ensemble de ces informations permet de planifier des actions spécifiques et concrètes dans le but d’améliorer la couverture des programmes concernés.
La méthodologie SQUEAC se compose de trois étapes principales:
L’étape 1 consiste à identifier les zones de couverture élevée ou faible et des barrières à l’accessibilité
L’étape 2 permet de vérifier des hypothèses sur les zones de couverture faible ou élevée au moyen d’enquêtes sur petites zones
L’étape 3 permet d’estimer la couverture globale à travers la construction d’un « a priori » (basé sur les barrières et les boosters), de l’Évidence Vraisemblable et d’un « post priori » basé sur la recherche de cas.
Aux recommandations ci-dessus sont ajoutées des recommandations spécifiques à l’attention:
De la Croix Rouge de Belgique:
-Evaluation des Centre d’Accueil Pour Nutrition (CAPN),
-Définition de la stratégie communautaire sur plusieurs années,
-Réflexion de concert avec la DRS et les DS (en impliquant les CISSE et les Points Focaux Nutrition) au concept CAPN et ses orientations en vue d’une meilleure intégration dans le système sanitaire,
-Travail conjoint avec la Direction Régionale de la Santé et les District Sanitaire sur un système harmonisé de collecte des données communautaires incluant tous les paramètres de suivi de la MAS (base de données complémentaires)
-Renforcement des ressources humaines des formations sanitaires en personnel additionnel,
-Révision de l’organisation terrain depuis le pôle technique jusqu’au positionnement des agents de terrain.
De la Direction régionale de la Santé du Sahel:
-Suivi de la mise en oeuvre des recommandations,
-Accompagnement du district dans la mise en oeuvre des recommandations,
-Mise en place d’un système harmonisé de collecte des données communautaires incluant tous les paramètres de suivi de la MAS (base de données complémentaires)
-Augmentation des ressources humaines dans les centres de santé,
-Recherche d’un système de motivation des agents de santé des CSPS (FBR, primes) conjointement avec les districts.
Du District sanitaire de Gorom Gorom :
-Restitution formelle des résultats de la SQUEAC,
-Evaluation de la mise en oeuvre des recommandations de la SQUEAC dans les cadres de concertation périodiques,
-Renforcement de la concertation entre acteurs de mise en oeuvre du programme,
-Recherche d’un système de motivation des Agents de santé communautaire (ASBC),
-Renforcement des compétences des agents de santé (formation, supervision),
-Renforcement des ressources humaines des CSPS,
-Amélioration des connaissances des populations sur la malnutrition et le programme de PEC,
-Recherche d’un système de motivation des agents de santé des CSPS (FBR, primes),
-Recherche des moyens pour faire face aux barrières géographiques.
Le Croix Rouge de Belgique (CRB) et la Croix Rouge Burkinabè travaillent en partenariat avec le service de la santé depuis 2007 dans la région du Sahel au Burkina Faso. Ce partenariat est orienté vers le renforcement des capacités en ce qui concerne la Prise en Charge de la Malnutrition Aiguë sous financement ECHO. Aujourd’hui, le programme couvre les 13 CSPS dans le district du Sebba aussi que 23 CAPN (Centre d’Accueil Pour Nutrition). Le programme est actuellement en phase 6, phase ayant débutée en mars 2013 qui prendra fin en janvier 2014. Cette phase prévoit de consolider l’appui au système de santé de la région du Sahel en vue d’accroitre son efficacité dans la prise en charge ambulatoire de la malnutrition aigüe à travers des appuis techniques et financiers touchant à la fois la qualité, la couverture, le suivi/évaluation et la capitalisation de la prise en charge de la malnutrition aigüe.
","Ce programme a été identifié par le biais du projet «Coverage Monitoring Network» (CMN). Le projet CMN est une initiative inter-agence qui vise à accroître et d'améliorer le suivi de la couverture de la gestion communautaire de la malnutrition aiguë (CMAM) programmes à l'échelle mondiale, et renforce les capacités des professionnels nationaux et internationaux de la nutrition. Sa vocation est de fournir un support technique et des outils aux programmes de PCMA afin de les aider à évaluer leur impact, de partager et capitaliser les leçons apprises sur les facteurs influençant leur performance. Le projet met l'accent sur le renforcement des compétences en méthodologie SQUEAC et SLEAC. Il est mis en œuvre par un consortium dirigé par ACF International, et comprend Save the Children, Concern Worldwide, International Medical Corps, Helen Keller International et Valid International. Le projet est financé par la Commission européenne, Direction générale de l'aide humanitaire et de la protection civile (ECHO) et le Bureau du Foreign Disaster Assistance des États-Unis (OFDA) de l'USAID. Pour en savoir plus, s'il vous plaît visitez le site Web de la CMN à
http://www.coverage-monitoring.org/
Veuillez suivre le lien ci-dessous pour accéder au rapport complet du CMN sur la couverture du projet PCMA dans le district de Sebba:
http://www.coverage-monitoring.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/RAPPORT-SQUEAC-SEBBA.pdf
","","","","","","","International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","Bilateral and donor agencies and lenders","European Commission Humanitarian Aid & Civil Protection (ECHO)","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","23213","","Management of severe acute malnutrition","","","","SAM child","Enfants de 6 à 59 mois","District de Sebba","Primary health care center","","Le cadre approprié pour la prise en charge de la malnutrition aiguë modérée est constitué des Centres de Santé et de Promotion Sociale (CSPS), des Centres Médicaux avec Antenne Chirurgicale (CMA) ou tout autre structure menant des activités de supplémentation alimentaire. En période d’urgence des Centres de Supplémentation Nutritionnelle (CSN) pourront être ouverts à cet effet.
Le cadre approprié de la prise en charge de la malnutrition sévère est le centre de récupération et d’éducation nutritionnelle (CREN). Son rôle principal est le traitement de la malnutrition sévère et l’éducation des familles en matière de nutrition. Là où il n’existe pas de CREN, les CSPS doivent assurer une prise en charge en externe des cas adaptés à ce mode de traitement.
","La SQUEAC c´est une évaluation semi‐quantitative parce que combinant des données quantitatives et qualitatives:
Données quantitatives: données de routine (admissions, abandons, indicateurs de performance) et données collectées (cas couverts et cas non couverts) au cours d’enquêtes sur petites et grandes zones.
Données qualitatives: informations (opinions, connaissances sur la malnutrition, connaissances du programme de PEC, perception de la malnutrition, recours aux soins, facteurs limitant la PEC…) collectées auprès la communauté, des acteurs et bénéficiaires impliqués dans le service.
","Une investigation de la couverture du programme de prise en charge de la MAS dans le district a été conduite du 1 au 20 novembre 2013 en utilisant la méthodologie « Semi Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage » (SQUEAC). L´outil SQUEAC permet d´assurer à moindre coût un monitoring régulier des programmes et d´identifier les zones de couverture faible ou élevée ainsi que les raisons expliquant ces situations. L’ensemble de ces informations permet de planifier des actions spécifiques et concrètes dans le but d’améliorer la couverture des programmes concernés.
La méthodologie SQUEAC se compose de trois étapes principales:
L’étape 1 consiste à identifier les zones de couverture élevée ou faible et des barrières à l’accessibilité
L’étape 2 permet de vérifier des hypothèses sur les zones de couverture faible ou élevée au moyen d’enquêtes sur petites zones
L’étape 3 permet d’estimer la couverture globale à travers la construction d’un « a priori » (basé sur les barrières et les boosters), de l’Évidence Vraisemblable et d’un « post priori » basé sur la recherche de cas.
Points forts:
- Les ASC / AV sont actifs avec leurs activités
- Le CSPS est le premier recours aux soins
- Il existe une bonne connaissance et une appréciation du traitement ATPE.
Barrières à l’accessibilité des soins qui limitent la couverture:
- La distance et l’inaccessibilité géographique des certains villages, surtout en saison des pluies.
- La qualité de la prise en charge de la Malnutrition Aigüe Sévère au niveau CSPS : Pas de dépistage systématique aux cours des consultations, temps d’attente trop long, manque de communication entre les AS et les mères concernant le traitement, mauvais accueil au CSPS.
- Manque de connaissance de la malnutrition et du programme : les mères voient que l’enfant est malade mais ne savent pas de quelle maladie l’enfant souffre ni pourquoi. Elles vont au CSPS car c’est là où elles soignent les enfants malades mais pas parce qu’elles connaissent le programme.