Effect of placement agitation and placement time on the shear bond strength of 3 self-etching adhesives

Journal Article

Print(0)

Operative dentistry

Oper.Dent.

Jul-Aug

426

430

LR: 20131121; JID: 7605679; 0 (Acrylic Resins); 0 (AdheSE cement); 0 (Clearfil SE Bond); 0 (Composite Resins); 0 (Dentin-Bonding Agents); 0 (Resin Cements); 0 (Xeno III); 0 (Z100 composite resin); 059QF0KO0R (Water); 7631-86-9 (Silicon Dioxide); C6V6S92N3

United States

0361-7734; 0361-7734

PMID: 16924982

eng

Journal Article; D

10.2341/05-52 [doi]

Unknown(0)

16924982

This study measured the shear bond strength (SBS) of 3 self-etching bonding agents to enamel and dentin with and without agitation at 3 different application times. The null hypotheses tested were that agitation and application time have no effect on bond strength. Occlusal surfaces of 180 recently extracted caries-free human molars were wet ground with 600 grit wet-dry silica carbide abrasive paper to obtain a flat enamel surface. The teeth were divided into 18 groups of 10 teeth. Three self-etching bonding agents, Clearfil SE BOND (Kuraray America), Xeno III (Dentsply) and AdheSE (Ivoclar-Vivadent) were applied using application times of 10, 20 or 30 seconds with or without agitation, thinned with a gentle stream of air and cured for 10 seconds, according to manufacturers' directions. Z100 (3M ESPE) composite, A2 shade, was placed over the cured adhesive and cured for 40 seconds. The samples were stored in distilled water at room temperature until testing. The samples were tested in shear to failure with a 1-mm/minute crosshead speed. After enamel shear bond strength testing, the teeth were again ground with 400 and 600-grit wet-dry SiC paper to obtain a flat dentin surface. The protocol used for preparing the enamel bond test samples was repeated, and the teeth were stored until testing in distilled water at room temperature. The samples were again tested in shear at a 1-mm/minute crosshead speed. Values were converted to MPa and data analyzed for intergroup differences using ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests. Agitation did not improve enamel SBS for any of the materials tested, but there was a significant difference in enamel SBS among materials: Clearfil SE Bond shear bond strength was greater than Xeno III, which was greater than AdheSE. At 10 seconds application time on dentin, agitation improved the Clearfil SE Bond SBS and, at 20 seconds application time on dentin, agitation significantly improved SBS to dentin for all systems tested. Agitation had no affect when the adhesive was applied to dentin for 30 seconds. Clearfil SE Bond SBS to dentin was significantly higher than the other self-etching adhesives tested except at 10 seconds without agitation.

Acrylic Resins/chemistry, Composite Resins/chemistry, Dental Bonding, Dental Enamel/ultrastructure, Dentin/ultrastructure, Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry, Humans, Kinetics, Materials Testing, Resin Cements/chemistry, Shear Strength, Silicon Dioxide/chemistry, Surface Properties, Temperature, Time Factors, Water/chemistry, Zirconium/chemistry

Velasquez,L. M., Sergent,R. S., Burgess,J. O., Mercante,D. E.

University of the Pacific, Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA.

http://vp9py7xf3h.search.serialssolutions.com/?charset=utf-8&pmid=16924982

2006