National Reporting Instrument 2021
Background
[iBG]
Adopted in 2010 at the 63rd World Health Assembly (WHA Res 63.16), the WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel (“the Code”) seeks to strengthen the understanding and ethical management of international health personnel recruitment through improved data, information, and international cooperation.
Article 7 of the Code encourages WHO Member States to exchange information on the international recruitment and migration of health personnel. The WHO Director General is additionally mandated to report to the World Health Assembly every 3 years.
WHO Member States completed the 3rd round of national reporting in March 2019. The WHO Director General reported progress on implementation to the 72nd World Health Assembly in May 2019 (A 72/23). The 3rd Round of National Reporting additionally informed the Member-State led Review of the Code’s relevance and effectiveness, as presented to the 73rd WHA in 2020 (A 73/9).
The Review highlights that Code implementation, through targeted support and safeguards, is necessary to ensure that Health Emergency and Universal Health Coverage-related progress in Member States serves to reinforce rather than compromise similar achievement in others. In light of the considerations in the Report and decision WHA 73(30), the WHO Secretariat has additionally prepared the Health Workforce Support and Safeguards List, 2020.
The National Reporting Instrument (NRI) is a country-based, self-assessment tool for information exchange and Code monitoring. The NRI enables WHO to collect and share current evidence and information on the international recruitment and migration of health personnel. The findings from the 4th Round of National Reporting are to be presented at the 75th World Health Assembly in May 2022. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the NRI (2021) has been adapted to additionally capture information related to health personnel recruitment and migration in the context of the pandemic.
The deadline for submitting reports is 31 January 2022.
Should technical difficulties prevent national authorities from filling in the online questionnaire, it is also possible to download the NRI via the link: https://www.who.int/teams/health-workforce/migration/code-nri. Please complete the NRI and submit it, electronically or in hard copy, to the following address:
Health Workforce Department
Universal Health Coverage and Health Systems
World Health Organization
20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27
Switzerland
hrhinfo@who.int
Disclaimer: The data and information collected through the National Reporting Instrument will be made publicly available via the WHO web-site following the proceedings of the 75th WHA in 2022. The quantitative data collected will be updated on and available through the National Health Workforce Accounts online platform. (http://www.who.int/hrh/statistics/nhwa/en/).
Article 7 of the Code encourages WHO Member States to exchange information on the international recruitment and migration of health personnel. The WHO Director General is additionally mandated to report to the World Health Assembly every 3 years.
WHO Member States completed the 3rd round of national reporting in March 2019. The WHO Director General reported progress on implementation to the 72nd World Health Assembly in May 2019 (A 72/23). The 3rd Round of National Reporting additionally informed the Member-State led Review of the Code’s relevance and effectiveness, as presented to the 73rd WHA in 2020 (A 73/9).
The Review highlights that Code implementation, through targeted support and safeguards, is necessary to ensure that Health Emergency and Universal Health Coverage-related progress in Member States serves to reinforce rather than compromise similar achievement in others. In light of the considerations in the Report and decision WHA 73(30), the WHO Secretariat has additionally prepared the Health Workforce Support and Safeguards List, 2020.
The National Reporting Instrument (NRI) is a country-based, self-assessment tool for information exchange and Code monitoring. The NRI enables WHO to collect and share current evidence and information on the international recruitment and migration of health personnel. The findings from the 4th Round of National Reporting are to be presented at the 75th World Health Assembly in May 2022. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the NRI (2021) has been adapted to additionally capture information related to health personnel recruitment and migration in the context of the pandemic.
The deadline for submitting reports is 31 January 2022.
Should technical difficulties prevent national authorities from filling in the online questionnaire, it is also possible to download the NRI via the link: https://www.who.int/teams/health-workforce/migration/code-nri. Please complete the NRI and submit it, electronically or in hard copy, to the following address:
Health Workforce Department
Universal Health Coverage and Health Systems
World Health Organization
20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27
Switzerland
hrhinfo@who.int
Disclaimer: The data and information collected through the National Reporting Instrument will be made publicly available via the WHO web-site following the proceedings of the 75th WHA in 2022. The quantitative data collected will be updated on and available through the National Health Workforce Accounts online platform. (http://www.who.int/hrh/statistics/nhwa/en/).
[hidLabels]
//hidden: Please not delete.
Please describe
Disclaimer
[disclaim]
For more information on WHO Data Policy kindly refer to http://www.who.int/publishing/datapolicy/en/

For more information on WHO Data Policy kindly refer to http://www.who.int/publishing/datapolicy/en/
I have read and understood the WHO policy on the use and sharing of data collected by WHO in Member States outside the context of public health emergencies
Designated National Authority Contact Details
[q01b]
Contact information:
Country
Norway
Full name of institution:
Norwegian Directorate of Health
Name of designated national authority:
Erik SIrnes
Title of designated national authority:
Senior adviser
Telephone number: (E.g. +41227911530 .)
004798013027
Email: (Please enter one email address only.)
pbx160200asgh@helsedir.no,hrhinfo@who.int
Implementation of the Code
[q1]
1. Has your country taken steps to implement the Code?
Yes
[q1x1x]
1.1 Actions have been taken to communicate and share information across sectors on the international recruitment and migration of health personnel, as well as to publicize the Code, among relevant ministries, departments and agencies, nationally and/or sub-nationally.
Yes
[q1x1]
Action 1
A "user manual" explaining the background and principles of the Code has been produced and the Code has been translated into Norwegian.
Action 2
Information seminars has been organized since 2011 and in 2015 a forum to discuss the Code and its implementation was formed. The forum has been inactive the last couple of years but will be re-activated after the pandemic.
Action 3
The intention of implementing the Code has been acknowledged in a government white paper.
[q1x2x]
1.2 Measures have been taken or are being considered to introduce changes to laws or policies consistent with the recommendations of the Code.
Yes
[q1x2]
Measure 1
In trust meetings the Minister of Health has requested that the regional health authorities and its subordinates recruit health workers in accordance with the Code.
Measure 2
The principles of the Code are promoted in the national guidelines for appointments by employers in the health and care services.
Measure 3
[q1x3x]
1.3 Records are maintained on all recruiters authorized by competent authorities to operate within their jurisdiction.
No
[q1x4x]
1.4 Good practices, as called for by the Code, are encouraged and promoted among recruitment agencies.
Yes
[q1x4]
Please describe:
1.4.1 Promotion of the Code among private recruitment agencies.
Recruitment agencies are invited to the forum on the code of practice (see 1.1) where they are encouraged to comply with the Code and be inspired by good practices.
1.4.2 Domestic legislation or policy requiring ethical practice of private recruitment agencies, as consistent with the principles and articles of the Code.
1.4.3 Public or private certification of ethical practice for private recruitment agencies.
No public certification. The employer's association NHO Service has established ethical guidelines for its agencies and a certification of quality system.
1.4.4 Others
[q1x5x]
1.5 Measures have been taken to consult stakeholders in decision-making processes and/or involve them in activities related to the international recruitment of health personnel.
Yes
[q1x5]
Measure 1
Relevant stakeholders are invited to the forum on the code of practice (see 1.1).
Measure 2
Measure 3
[q1x6x]
1.6 Other steps:
No
Partnerships, Technical Collaboration and Financial Support 1/2
[q2x1]
2.1. Has your country provided technical or financial assistance to one or more WHO Member States, particularly developing countries, or other stakeholders to support the implementation of the Code?
2.1.1 Specific support for implementation of the Code
2.1.2 Support for health system strengthening
Mostly through GFF, Gavi and GFATM (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) is the responsible authority). Some support has also been provided in Europe through the EEA Grants.
2.1.3 Support for health personnel development
Mostly through The Norwegian Agency for Exchange Cooperation (Norec), GFF, Gavi, GFATM and bilateral support to Malawi and India. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) is the responsible authority.
2.1.4 No support provided
2.1.5 Other areas of support:
[q2x2]
2.2. Has your country received technical or financial assistance from one or more WHO Member States, the WHO secretariat, or other stakeholders to support the implementation of the Code?
2.2.1 Specific support for implementation of the Code
2.2.2 Support for health system strengthening
2.2.3 Support for health personnel development
2.2.4 No support received
2.2.5 Other areas of support:
Partnerships, Technical Collaboration and Financial Support 2/2
[q3]
3. Has your country or its sub-national governments entered into bilateral, multilateral, or regional agreements and/or arrangements with respect to the international recruitment and migration of health personnel?
No
[q3xUploadx1]
[q3xUploadx2]
[q3xUploadx3]
Health Workforce Development and Health System Sustainability
[q4]
4. Does your country strive to meet its health personnel needs with its domestically trained health personnel, including measures to educate, retain and sustain a health workforce that is appropriate for the specific conditions of your country, including areas of greatest need?
Yes
[q4x1x]
4.1 Measures taken to educate the health workforce
Yes
[q4x1]
4.1.1 Manage production
4.1.2 Improve quality of education
4.1.3 Strengthen regulation
Recommendations on education capacity adjusting are submitted to the education authorities annually, based on health workforce planning (see also 4.2). 5-year programs on capacity building in primary health care services.
4.4 Others
[q4x2x]
4.2 Measures taken to ensure the sustainability* of the health workforce
Yes
[q4x2]
4.2.1 Workforce planning/forecasting
4.2.2 Increasing domestic production and education opportunities
4.2.3 Increasing employment opportunities
4.2.4 Manage recruitment of international health personnel
Other
[q4x3x]
4.3 Measures taken to address the geographical mal-distribution and retention of health workers*
Yes
[q4x3]
4.3.1 Education (Education institutions in underserved areas; students from under-served areas; relevant topics in education/professional development programmes; others)
Flexible (decentralized, part-time and/or online-based) education. Universities and university colleges are allocated specific funding for a certain number of students in the various health care professions every year (in the national budget process). The amount of funding is therefore distributed geographically, at least partially with a view to the need for personnel in that area.
4.3.2 Regulation (Mandatory service agreements; scholarships and education subsidies with return of service agreements; enhanced scope of practice; task shifting; skill-mix; others)
Agreements to strengthen the general practitioner services and education of specialist in general medicine (ALIS).
4.3.3 Incentives (Financial and non-financial)
Grants for recruitment and economic incentives.
4.3.4 Support (Decent and safe living and working conditions; career advancement opportunities; social recognition measures; others)
Through local initiatives.
[q4x4x]
4.4 Other relevant measures
No
[q5]
5. Are there specific policies and/or laws that guides international recruitment, migration and integration of foreign-trained health personnel in your country?
Yes
[q5x1]
5.1 Please provide further information in the box below:
Law/policy 1
The national guidelines for appointments by employers in the health and care services.
Law/policy 2
Law/policy 3
[q6x]
6. Recognizing the role of other government entities, does the Ministry of Health have processes (e.g. policies, mechanisms, unit) to monitor and coordinate across sectors on issues related to the international recruitment and migration of health personnel?
Yes
[q6x1]
6.1 Please provide further information in the box below:
The Ministry of Health has delegated responsibility of monitoring to the Directorate of Health. Monitoring is conducted with the support of Statistics Norway (subordinate of the Ministry of Finance). The directorate have a dialogue with other relevant authorities in relation to the forum on implementation of the Code (see 1.1).
[q7x]
7. Has your country established a database or compilation of laws and regulations related to international health personnel recruitment and migration and, as appropriate, information related to their implementation?
No
Responsibilities, Rights and Recruitment Practices
[q8x]
8. Which legal safeguards and/or other mechanisms are in place to ensure that migrant health personnel enjoy the same legal rights and responsibilities as the domestically trained health workforce? Please tick all options that apply from the list below:
8.1 Migrant health personnel are recruited internationally using mechanisms that allow them to assess the benefits and risk associated with employment positions and to make timely and informed decisions regarding them
8.2 Migrant health personnel are hired, promoted and remunerated based on objective criteria such as levels of qualification, years of experience and degrees of professional responsibility on the same basis as the domestically trained health workforce
8.3 Migrant health personnel enjoy the same opportunities as the domestically trained health workforce to strengthen their professional education, qualifications and career progression
8.4 Other mechanisms, please provide details below if possible:
[q8xoth]
8.4 Please describe at least one mechanism
Mechanism 1
The Working Environment Act (Arbeidsmiljøloven) ensures that all employees have the same fundamental rights, regardless of background.
Mechanism 2
Mechanism 3
[q9x]
9. Please submit any other comments or information you wish to provide regarding legal, administrative and other measures that have been taken or are planned in your country to ensure fair recruitment and employment practices of foreign-trained and/or immigrant health personnel.
The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority controls that all employers have fair employment practices, regardless of the employee's background, and that practices comply with the Working Environment Act.
The Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombudsman is a low threshold alternative to court proceedings in cases of discrimination.
[q10x]
10. Regarding domestically trained/ emigrant health personnel (diaspora) working outside your country, please submit any comments or information on measures that have been taken or are planned in your country to ensure their fair recruitment and employment practices, as well as difficulties encountered
Measure 1
Norway is a primarily a destination country, and no measures are planned specifically to ensure fair recruitment abroad for emigrant personnel.
Measure 2
Measure 3
Data on International Health Personnel Recruitment & Migration
[iq11]
Improving the availability and international comparability of data is essential to understanding and addressing the global dynamic of health worker migration.
[q11]
11. Does your country have any mechanism(s) or entity(ies) to maintain statistical records of foreign-born and foreign-trained health personnel?
Yes
[q11x1]
Please describe
Statistics Norway maintains a register on all employed (health) workers, with possibilities to connect with information on country of training and birth.
The Norwegian Directorate of Health maintains a register on all health workers authorized to practice in Norway, including information on country of training.
[iQ12]
12. Data on the active stock of health personnel, disaggregated by country of training and birth
Previous data shared with WHO is available here. Please liaise with your NHWA focal point and update as relevant.
For the latest year available, consistent with the National Health Workforce Accounts (NHWA) Indicators 1-07 and 1-08, please provide information on the total stock of health personnel in your country (preferably the active workforce1), disaggregated by the country of training (foreign-trained) and the country of birth (foreign-born). Please consult with your NHWA focal point, if available, to ensure that data reported below is consistent with NHWA reporting.
Previous data shared with WHO is available here. Please liaise with your NHWA focal point and update as relevant.
For the latest year available, consistent with the National Health Workforce Accounts (NHWA) Indicators 1-07 and 1-08, please provide information on the total stock of health personnel in your country (preferably the active workforce1), disaggregated by the country of training (foreign-trained) and the country of birth (foreign-born). Please consult with your NHWA focal point, if available, to ensure that data reported below is consistent with NHWA reporting.
[q12x0]
12.1 Consolidated stock of active health personnel
This information can be provided by one of the following three options. Please choose your preferred mode of data entry:
This information can be provided by one of the following three options. Please choose your preferred mode of data entry:
Option B: Download the Excel template with existing data and Upload with the updated data
No comment
[q12x1x3]
Upload any format of documentation that provides such information (e.g. pdf, excel, word).
[q13x2]
12.2 Top 10 countries of training for foreign-trained health personnel
Please provide data on the top 10 countries of training for foreign-trained health personnel in your country. This information can be provided by one of the following two options:
Please provide data on the top 10 countries of training for foreign-trained health personnel in your country. This information can be provided by one of the following two options:
Option B: Download the Excel template with existing data and Upload with the updated data
[q13x2x2]
Option B: Completion of the template in Excel
Download and Upload
Download and Upload
Please upload file (Maximum file size: 5MB)
No comment
[q13x2x3]
Upload any format of documentation that provides such information (e.g. pdf, excel, word).
Please upload file
COVID-19 and Health personnel mobility
[q13]
13. Were measures undertaken at national or sub-national level in response to the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to the temporary or permanent mobility of international health personnel?
13.1 No change in national or sub-national regulation, policy or processes related to the entry or exit of foreign-trained or foreign-born health personnel
13.2 National and/or sub-national regulation, policy or processes enacted to ease entry and integration of foreign-trained or foreign-born health personnel
To ease entry, critical personnel has been given exceptions for entry, quarantines and similar regulations for periods of time. This has especially applied to health workers commuting across the border. Students of health professions in Norway as well as the EEA has been given the opportunity to apply for a licence to practice with the purpose of working with covid-19 tasks.
13.3 National and/or sub-national regulation, policy or processes enacted to limit the exit of health personnel from country
At the height of the pandemic health workers were prohibited to leave the country.
13.4 Others
[q14]
14. Did you have a mechanism to monitor the inflow and outflow of health personnel to/from your country during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Inflow
Outflow
No
[q14x1]
14.1 How many foreign-trained or foreign-born health personnel were newly (inflow) active (temporarily and/or permanently) in your country in 2019 and 2020?
Doctors | Nurses | Midwives | Dentists | Pharmacists | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data Source (e.g. Regulatory authority, immigration records, work permits, etc.) Please ensure data source consistency for each category of personnel for the two years |
Statistics Norway (employment register) | Statistics Norway (employment register) | Statistics Norway (employment register) | Statistics Norway (employment register) | Statistics Norway (employment register) | Based on foreign-training (includes both domestic-born and foreign-born health personnel). Includes foreign-trained employees registered in november 2019 and 2020, respectively, who were not registered the previous year. |
2020 | 1174 | 434 | 38 | 136 | 157 | |
2019 | 1206 | 420 | 30 | 133 | 143 |
[q14x2]
14.2 How many domestically-trained health personnel left (outflow) your country in 2019 and 2020 (for temporary or permanent migration)?
Doctors | Nurses | Midwives | Dentists | Pharmacists | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data Source (e.g. letters of good standing, emigration records, G-G agreements etc.) Please ensure data source consistency for each category of personnel for the two years |
Statistics Norway (employment register) | Statistics Norway (employment register) | Statistics Norway (employment register) | Statistics Norway (employment register) | Statistics Norway (employment register) | The numbers are approximate: These are domestically-trained health personnel under the age of 74 who were active in 2018 and 2019, respectively, but not in following year. The majority has left the country but they might include some deceased health personnel. |
2020 | 23 | 96 | 6 | 4 | 5 | The numbers are approximate: These are domestically-trained health personnel under the age of 74 who were active in 2019 but not in 2020. The majority has left the country but they might include some deceased health personnel. |
2019 | 38 | 113 | 3 | 3 | 7 | The numbers are approximate: These are domestically-trained health personnel under the age of 74 who were active in 2018 but not in 2019. The majority has left the country but they might include some deceased health personnel. |
[q15]
15. Please list any challenges related to ethical international recruitment of health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic
Please describe (e.g. active recruitment of ICU personnel)
Please describe (e.g. active recruitment of ICU personnel)
1st Challenge
A lot of Scandinavian nurses (especially intensive care nurses) and midwives work in Norway for shorter or longer periods of time. During the pandemic it became a challenge crossing borders and it was also an ethical dilemma that the nurses were also needed in their country of training as the pandemic increased the need for nurses.
2nd Challenge
3rd Challenge
Constraints, Solutions, and Complementary Comments
[q16]
16. Please list in priority order, the three main constraints to the ethical management of international migration in your country and propose possible solutions
Main constraints | Possible solution /Recommendation | |
---|---|---|
A significant share of the health workforce in Norway is foreign-trained, indicating a certain level of reliance on foreign-trained personnel, which has been more noticeable during the pandemic. | Increased educational capacity and completion rate for some professions and better utilization of existing workforce (e.g. more full-time employment, less turnover to other sectors) can decrease the pull-effect. The pull-effect do take place in Norway with its high wages, advanced health services and decent working environment. | |
While we have reason to believe that municipalities and public-sector hospitals recruit in accordance with the Code, we know less about the practices of recruitment agencies. These agencies offer personnel to the same municipalities and hospitals, especially during vacations. | Recruitment agencies can be more actively involved and examined. Hospitals and municipalities are actively avoiding agencies with a bad reputation, and a system making it easier for employers to know which agencies are serious could be a solution. | |
While migration data has improved significantly lately, we still need more knowledge. For example, we know little about the motivation of migrants, and hence we do not know if the migration is a result of active recruitment. Also, we don't know enough about migration patterns and the extent of the domino effect. The data shows that Norway is not recruiting from the most vulnerable countries, but we don't know if we contribute to brain-drain in these countries through the domino effect. | A continued focus on strengthening international migration data and research. |
[q17]
17. Is there any specific support your country requires to strengthen implementation of the Code?
17.1 Support to strengthen data and information
17.2 Support for policy dialogue and development
17.3 Support for the development of bilateral/multi-lateral agreements
17.4 Other areas of support:
[q18]
18. Submit any other complementary comments or material you may wish to provide regarding the international recruitment and migration of health personnel, as related to implementation of the Code.
[q18x1]
Please upload any supporting files
Thank You
[iThank]
You have reached the end of the National Reporting Instrument - 2021. You may go back to any question to update your answers or confirm your entry by clicking ‘Submit’.